+- Hack Forums (https://hackforums.net)
+-- Forum: Tech (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=444)
+--- Forum: Coding (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=151)
+---- Forum: Software Development (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=118)
+---- Thread: [.NET] Crypter ntutorial needed (/showthread.php?tid=4394800)
Crypter ntutorial needed - Motojojo - Aug 14, 2014
Hello,
Does anyone here have an tutorial on how to make an file crypter in Visual basic?
In english preferbably.
I'm learning VB and I just finished my simple RAT, now trying to crypt it and eventually want to bind it to an picture file so it's FUD and easy to spread :)
If you've an crypter or file bidner you made yourself I can give you my RAT soruce in exchange, it's not that great, but it inhcludes
-remote desktop
-FTP/SMTP support
-screenshot taker
-fuck with their speakers
-has an batch/vb executing program
-it uses inverted connection, so they can't really backtrace you so easy and can't steal your FTP/SMTP login credentials
-password stealer
Thanks already folks!
OT: Perhaps an File binder tutorial would be nice too.
* - Dialog - Aug 14, 2014
A wise man once said "if you develop your own RAT, and have to crypt it, that is one fine piece of copypasta"
* - RKYDA - Aug 14, 2014
You have made a R.A.T but you dont know how crypt your file? I will tell you the best method for you.
https://hackforums.net/search.php?action=results&sid=d378a9c0fba5b5a224917c1629d96b7b&sortby=lastpost&order=desc
* - Motojojo - Aug 14, 2014
(Aug 14, 2014 01:37 AM)Dialog Wrote: A wise man once said "if you develop your own RAT, and have to crypt it, that is one fine piece of copypasta"
Making it more FUD is beter, since I want to test it on virustotal and so on ;)
(Aug 14, 2014 01:56 AM)RKYDA Wrote: You have made a R.A.T but you dont know how crypt your file? I will tell you the best method for you.
https://hackforums.net/search.php?action=results&sid=d378a9c0fba5b5a224917c1629d96b7b&sortby=lastpost&order=desc
I knwo how to search function works, but it didn't gave me the kind of resulsts I wished for :^)
* - Dialog - Aug 14, 2014
(Aug 14, 2014 01:59 AM)Motojojo Wrote: Making it more FUD is beter, since I want to test it on virustotal and so on ;)
This post made me facepalm in so many ways.
What I was implying that IF you wrote all the code yourself, and did not copy paste it, there shouldn't be any detections.
There is no such thing as "more FUD" - either it's FUD, or it is not.
Virustotal distributes samples to antivirus companies, so if you have a FUD executable... it will get detected after scanning it on VT.
* - Motojojo - Aug 14, 2014
Yes, but think of it that if your RAT gets detected with the crypter on it? re-crypt and done, what if your RAT gets detected when it's not crypter? rewrite code? Or does it works different, if so explain please :)
* - Delirium™ - Aug 14, 2014
(Aug 14, 2014 02:01 AM)Dialog Wrote: This post made me facepalm in so many ways.
What I was implying that IF you wrote all the code yourself, and did not copy paste it, there shouldn't be any detections.
There is no such thing as "more FUD" - either it's FUD, or it is not.
Virustotal distributes samples to antivirus companies, so if you have a FUD executable... it will get detected after scanning it on VT.
That is wrong. There are generic ways of writing some stuff, e.g a keylogger, hence you get the detections. If you're writing a huge RAT project, I'm pretty sure the last thing you want to spend time at is make it FUD.
* - tweety - Aug 14, 2014
You smell that? *sniff*.. Smells like bullshit to me.