Home Upgrade Search Memberlist Extras Hacker Tools Award Goals Help Wiki Contact

.NET 

Crypter ntutorial needed

Hello,

Does anyone here have an tutorial on how to make an file crypter in Visual basic?
In english preferbably.

I'm learning VB and I just finished my simple RAT, now trying to crypt it and eventually want to bind it to an picture file so it's FUD and easy to spread :)

If you've an crypter or file bidner you made yourself I can give you my RAT soruce in exchange, it's not that great, but it inhcludes
-remote desktop
-FTP/SMTP support
-screenshot taker
-fuck with their speakers
-has an batch/vb executing program
-it uses inverted connection, so they can't really backtrace you so easy and can't steal your FTP/SMTP login credentials
-password stealer

Thanks already folks!

OT: Perhaps an File binder tutorial would be nice too.
A wise man once said "if you develop your own RAT, and have to crypt it, that is one fine piece of copypasta"
You have made a R.A.T but you dont know how crypt your file? I will tell you the best method for you.
https://hackforums.net/search.php?action...order=desc
(Aug 14, 2014 01:37 AM)Dialog Wrote:  A wise man once said "if you develop your own RAT, and have to crypt it, that is one fine piece of copypasta"

Making it more FUD is beter, since I want to test it on virustotal and so on ;)


(Aug 14, 2014 01:56 AM)RKYDA Wrote:  You have made a R.A.T but you dont know how crypt your file? I will tell you the best method for you.
https://hackforums.net/search.php?action...order=desc

I knwo how to search function works, but it didn't gave me the kind of resulsts I wished for :^)
(Aug 14, 2014 01:59 AM)Motojojo Wrote:  Making it more FUD is beter, since I want to test it on virustotal and so on ;)

This post made me facepalm in so many ways.

What I was implying that IF you wrote all the code yourself, and did not copy paste it, there shouldn't be any detections.
There is no such thing as "more FUD" - either it's FUD, or it is not.
Virustotal distributes samples to antivirus companies, so if you have a FUD executable... it will get detected after scanning it on VT.
Yes, but think of it that if your RAT gets detected with the crypter on it? re-crypt and done, what if your RAT gets detected when it's not crypter? rewrite code? Or does it works different, if so explain please :)
(Aug 14, 2014 02:01 AM)Dialog Wrote:  This post made me facepalm in so many ways.

What I was implying that IF you wrote all the code yourself, and did not copy paste it, there shouldn't be any detections.
There is no such thing as "more FUD" - either it's FUD, or it is not.
Virustotal distributes samples to antivirus companies, so if you have a FUD executable... it will get detected after scanning it on VT.

That is wrong. There are generic ways of writing some stuff, e.g a keylogger, hence you get the detections. If you're writing a huge RAT project, I'm pretty sure the last thing you want to spend time at is make it FUD.
You smell that? *sniff*.. Smells like bullshit to me.