+- Hack Forums (https://hackforums.net)
+-- Forum: Marketplace (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=105)
+--- Forum: Bazaar (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=450)
+---- Forum: Deal Disputes (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=111)
+---- Thread: [Official] Thread Sort Order (/showthread.php?tid=5178401)
Pages: Pages
1
2
Thread Sort Order - Omniscient - Feb 20, 2016
I'm going to try an experiment. I've altered the default sort order for this section to be based on the thread creation date.
This should help sort the section in a more relative manner vs older threads bumped constantly and possibly hiding new problems.
* - Scymo - Feb 20, 2016
Excellent addition Omni.
I'll see how it works.
* - william - Feb 20, 2016
That isn't a bad idea. I hope this is one of the first new features you mentioned. :)
* - Stealth™ - Feb 20, 2016
I feel like this will heavily benefit the section. Thanks, Jesse!
* - i a m g o n e - Feb 20, 2016
Scammed - (inserthowmuchhackforumscosts) by ''my bb 1.7x'' uuid=null
Seems like a nice implementation
edit: I figured it out
* - Zexo - Feb 20, 2016
Sounds interesting will see what I think about it the next few days.
* - Grim - Feb 20, 2016
(Feb 20, 2016 10:23 PM)tl:dr Wrote: Scammed - (inserthowmuchhackforumscosts) by ''my bb 1.7x'' uuid=null
Nah but seriously, this is the first time im genuinely confused what this change does
it literally says it right in the thread. what dont you get?
(Feb 20, 2016 10:22 PM)Omniscient Wrote: altered the default sort order for this section to be based on the thread creation date.
* - Arptastic - Feb 20, 2016
Great addition omni, pls notice me senpai
* - i a m g o n e - Feb 20, 2016
(Feb 20, 2016 10:24 PM)๖ۣۜSith Lord Wrote: it literally says it right in the thread. what dont you get?
Im really sleepy, apologies
* - Grim - Feb 20, 2016
(Feb 20, 2016 10:25 PM)tl:dr Wrote: Im really sleepy, apologiesall good. I think this will definitely help with people who have been scammed recently and not getting any attention to there threads. Do you plan on implementing this in any other sections if this test goes well?
* - Raymond Reddington - Feb 20, 2016
So no more bump and expose?
Also, lets say a deal dispute isn't resolved for long, it stays that way without coming into people's attention unless they check the trust scan.
* - Grievοus - Feb 20, 2016
(Feb 20, 2016 10:29 PM)Raymond Reddington Wrote: So no more bump and expose?
Also, lets say a deal dispute isn't resolved for long, it stays that way without coming into people's attention unless they check the trust scan.
Hmm, it can go both ways though.
Most disputes that aren't made by big people are usually just lost into the abyss.
But.. I see your point where those big reports won't be able to be seen by the normal viewer of that section unless they go to page, lets say.. 500.
* - Omniscient - Feb 21, 2016
(Feb 20, 2016 10:29 PM)Raymond Reddington Wrote: So no more bump and expose?
Also, lets say a deal dispute isn't resolved for long, it stays that way without coming into people's attention unless they check the trust scan.
A report is a report. The Deal Dispute Database should be used more often to locate the existing thread. Most replies to DD threads are pointless anyways.
* - grady - Feb 21, 2016
When you realize there's a sort order...
(Feb 21, 2016 01:18 AM)Omniscient Wrote: A report is a report. The Deal Dispute Database should be used more often to locate the existing thread. Most replies to DD threads are pointless anyways.
That's very true.
In another forum, their player reports section was only allowed posts by the author, the accused, and any staff members. That might be something that'd cut down a lot of unnecessary posts within this section.
That also takes a reason for most members to check this section, but it further enforces how this section and the deal dispute db should be used.
* - Verizur - Feb 22, 2016
I think this is a great change and It will probably do a LOT of good!