Feb 20, 2016 10:22 PM
(This post was last modified: Feb 20, 2016 10:22 PM by Omniscient.)
I'm going to try an experiment. I've altered the default sort order for this section to be based on the thread creation date.
This should help sort the section in a more relative manner vs older threads bumped constantly and possibly hiding new problems.
DO NOT DEAL WITH THIS MEMBER
Excellent addition Omni.
I'll see how it works.
DO NOT DEAL WITH THIS MEMBER
That isn't a bad idea. I hope this is one of the first new features you mentioned. :)
DO NOT DEAL WITH THIS MEMBER
I feel like this will heavily benefit the section. Thanks, Jesse!
DO NOT DEAL WITH THIS MEMBER
Feb 20, 2016 10:23 PM
(This post was last modified: Feb 20, 2016 10:29 PM by i a m g o n e.)
Scammed - (inserthowmuchhackforumscosts) by ''my bb 1.7x'' uuid=null
Seems like a nice implementation
edit: I figured it out
Sounds interesting will see what I think about it the next few days.
Feb 20, 2016 10:24 PM
(This post was last modified: Feb 20, 2016 10:25 PM by Grim.)
(Feb 20, 2016 10:23 PM)i a m g o n e Wrote: Scammed - (inserthowmuchhackforumscosts) by ''my bb 1.7x'' uuid=null
Nah but seriously, this is the first time im genuinely confused what this change does
it literally says it right in the thread. what dont you get?
(Feb 20, 2016 10:22 PM)Omniscient Wrote: altered the default sort order for this section to be based on the thread creation date.
Great addition omni, pls notice me senpai
Arptastics LoL Riot Points Account Service! - AUTOBUY!
Add my skype for questions - arp.tastic
DO NOT DEAL WITH THIS MEMBER
(Feb 20, 2016 10:24 PM)Grim Wrote: it literally says it right in the thread. what dont you get?
Im really sleepy, apologies
Feb 20, 2016 10:27 PM
(This post was last modified: Feb 20, 2016 10:27 PM by Grim.)
(Feb 20, 2016 10:25 PM)i a m g o n e Wrote: Im really sleepy, apologies all good. I think this will definitely help with people who have been scammed recently and not getting any attention to there threads. Do you plan on implementing this in any other sections if this test goes well?
So no more bump and expose?
Also, lets say a deal dispute isn't resolved for long, it stays that way without coming into people's attention unless they check the trust scan.
(Feb 20, 2016 10:29 PM)Raymond Reddington Wrote: So no more bump and expose?
Also, lets say a deal dispute isn't resolved for long, it stays that way without coming into people's attention unless they check the trust scan.
Hmm, it can go both ways though.
Most disputes that aren't made by big people are usually just lost into the abyss.
But.. I see your point where those big reports won't be able to be seen by the normal viewer of that section unless they go to page, lets say.. 500.
(Feb 20, 2016 10:29 PM)Raymond Reddington Wrote: So no more bump and expose?
Also, lets say a deal dispute isn't resolved for long, it stays that way without coming into people's attention unless they check the trust scan.
A report is a report. The Deal Dispute Database should be used more often to locate the existing thread. Most replies to DD threads are pointless anyways.
Feb 21, 2016 01:20 AM
(This post was last modified: Feb 21, 2016 01:26 AM by grady.)
When you realize there's a sort order...
(Feb 21, 2016 01:18 AM)Omniscient Wrote: A report is a report. The Deal Dispute Database should be used more often to locate the existing thread. Most replies to DD threads are pointless anyways.
That's very true.
In another forum, their player reports section was only allowed posts by the author, the accused, and any staff members. That might be something that'd cut down a lot of unnecessary posts within this section.
That also takes a reason for most members to check this section, but it further enforces how this section and the deal dispute db should be used.
(Feb 3, 2018 03:19 PM)kickball34 Wrote: i'm gonna get your ip address and rat your pc.
I think this is a great change and It will probably do a LOT of good!
|