![]() |
|
Scanned 60% of the Internet for port 22, results! - Printable Version +- Hack Forums (https://hackforums.net) +-- Forum: Hacks, Exploits, and Various Discussions (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=45) +--- Forum: Grayhat • Purple Team • Hybrid Security (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=449) +---- Forum: Beginner Hacking (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +---- Thread: Scanned 60% of the Internet for port 22, results! (/showthread.php?tid=5740575) Pages: Pages
1
2
|
Scanned 60% of the Internet for port 22, results! - Carbanak - Oct 20, 2017 I've performed a mass scan of the Internet for IP addresses that have port 22 open. The reason I only scanned 60% of the Internet was due to the fact I was getting quite a few abuse reports from my VPS provider. I've grep and sorted the text file just to have IP addresses. So you can parse this data into any brute forcing tool you wish and enjoy the spoils. https://mega.nz/#!giwBSaYB!o_3g2zx8nwGFefbsjA9EmlLlXmh2YbQDl-jb-eZVqYY 🤝 * - RUMRUN - Oct 20, 2017 You actually think you scanned 60% of the internet? * - mrjammy - Oct 20, 2017 A normal world scan on port 22 is about 250-300mb ish * - Carbanak - Oct 20, 2017 (Oct 20, 2017 05:13 AM)Ѕnipe Wrote: You actually think you scanned 60% of the internet? Yes. PHP Code https://github.com/robertdavidgraham/masscan * - imscheurkie - Oct 20, 2017 (Oct 20, 2017 05:13 AM)Ѕnipe Wrote: You actually think you scanned 60% of the internet?This. You got any proof? * - RUMRUN - Oct 20, 2017 (Oct 20, 2017 05:20 AM)Carbanak Wrote: Yes. That's actually quite astonishing, TIL. Thanks man * - Carbanak - Oct 20, 2017 (Oct 20, 2017 08:38 AM)imscheurkie Wrote: This. You got any proof? Yes the proof is in the tarball gzip I uploaded to Mega. (Oct 20, 2017 08:39 AM)Ѕnipe Wrote: That's actually quite astonishing, TIL. No problem, if anything thank the creator of masscan. * - EGoyard - Oct 20, 2017 Dude. This is crazy af to me that you scanned 60 p of the internet. Almost can't wrap my head around the fact that the link you shared claims it can scan the internet in under 6 minutes moving 10 million packets per second. Awesome.. * - Elitas - Oct 20, 2017 The question is now: Can you try the default passwords on all their ports and make a list? Thaaat would be useful, lol. * - Carbanak - Oct 20, 2017 (Oct 20, 2017 09:43 AM)Elitas Wrote: The question is now: Can you try the default passwords on all their ports and make a list? I might just do that. 🤝 * - notluther - Oct 20, 2017 Ahh masscan, lovely tool. This is an interesting share, though I wonder how many people here know what to do with this kind of information? * - Shoe - Oct 20, 2017 (Oct 20, 2017 12:15 PM)Ed25519 Wrote: Ahh masscan, lovely tool. This is an interesting share, though I wonder how many people here know what to do with this kind of information? A lot. Masscan isn't just for the internet, but intranets as well. It's incredibly useful for red team ops; I haven't run into anyone who doesn't use it on red team. Hell, some blue team ops use it. * - notluther - Oct 20, 2017 (Oct 20, 2017 01:22 PM)Shoe Wrote: A lot. Masscan isn't just for the internet, but intranets as well. It's incredibly useful for red team ops; I haven't run into anyone who doesn't use it on red team. Hell, some blue team ops use it. I was more referring to the fact that this kind of thread was posted in the 'Beginner Hacking' section. I'm making a joke, of course, this subforum probably gets most of the traffic in the Hacking section of the site, so it makes sense to post here. * - Carbanak - Oct 20, 2017 (Oct 20, 2017 01:22 PM)Shoe Wrote: A lot. Masscan isn't just for the internet, but intranets as well. It's incredibly useful for red team ops; I haven't run into anyone who doesn't use it on red team. Hell, some blue team ops use it. I'm starting to prefer using this tool over nmap, just for port discovery I think it beats nmap hands down, of course for reconicense nmap is to tool to use. * - MexicanSwag1423 - Oct 20, 2017 wow good job! I wish to be like that one day |