+- Hack Forums (https://hackforums.net)
+-- Forum: General Topics (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=7)
+--- Forum: World (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=445)
+---- Forum: News and Happenings (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=89)
+---- Thread: Ben Shapiro Gets Destroyed by BBC But Wait There's MORE! (/showthread.php?tid=5984718)
Pages: Pages
1
2
Ben Shapiro Gets Destroyed by BBC But Wait There's MORE! - ToxicInfliction - Jun 29, 2019
Ben Shapiro: US commentator clashes with BBC's Andrew Neil - BBC News - YouTube
In this video Neil tops Shapiro in a heated debate.
But wait there is more! Shapiro is also debunked on "opinionated statements" he liked to call facts. This hour and ten minute video below is worth the watch!
RE: Ben Shapiro Gets Destroyed by BBC But Wait There's MORE! - BTC - Jun 29, 2019
(Jun 29, 2019 07:59 AM)T.R.I.N.I.T.Y Wrote: In this video Neil tops Shapiro in a heated debate.
Damn I was expecting this to actually be a debate..
Edit: I watched a bit of this next video, at 15 minutes so far...this guy is not trying to go to extreme lengths to take things out of context, but he is also very contradicting. In my opinion this guy just made a fool out of himself with this video. I will continue watching to see more though
Example: Ben - "If you do these 3 things, you'll be on your way to the privilege of middle class life, regardless of race, ethnicity, sexual orientation or gender"
Dumbass (mocking) - "The premise being that white privilege in america just flat out isn't real and racial inequality in America doesn't matter so long as you do these 3 things..."
Completely taking out of context, not sure how he took that from it at all. He didn't even touch base with white privilege or racial inequality, this was highlighting that these 3 steps were beneficial to all races, ethnicity, gender, etc...Whether it is harder for one race versus another due to white privilege, or not, is irrelevant. This guy seems to just pick at things, take them out of context and try to twist them entirely. I refer to him as dumbass because I've never heard of him before and he seems quite dull
RE: Ben Shapiro Gets Destroyed by BBC But Wait There's MORE! - ToxicInfliction - Jun 29, 2019
The first video is. The bottom video is an hour long video debunking Shapiro for the trash he is.
RE: Ben Shapiro Gets Destroyed by BBC But Wait There's MORE! - BTC - Jun 29, 2019
(Jun 29, 2019 08:28 AM)T.R.I.N.I.T.Y Wrote: Shapiro for the trash he is.
I disagree, the video was quite horrible. Sure, I don't like Shapiro and disagree with a lot of his views, although the guy who made this video is clearly contradicting. He failed in his points he was trying to make IMO, he just made himself look more like a fool then anything
He complains about Ben's opinions not being based off facts, rather his own interpretation, yet that is what he is doing the whole time. He claims many times that he is only interpreting facts these ways because of his own bias, but he is doing the exact same thing. In my opinion this guy just has to take his own advice because he is defining himself in many ways, and this video says a lot more about him, and the type of person he is then it does about the opposing party (ben)
RE: Ben Shapiro Gets Destroyed by BBC But Wait There's MORE! - ToxicInfliction - Jun 29, 2019
(Jun 29, 2019 08:33 AM)BTC Wrote: I disagree, the video was quite horrible. Sure, I don't like Shapiro and disagree with a lot of his views, although the guy who made this video is clearly contradicting. He failed in his points he was trying to make IMO, he just made himself look more like a fool then anything
He complains about Ben's opinions not being based off facts, rather his own interpretation, yet that is what he is doing the whole time. He claims many times that he is only interpreting facts these ways because of his own bias, but he is doing the exact same thing. In my opinion this guy just has to take his own advice because he is defining himself in many ways, and this video says a lot more about him, and the type of person he is then it does about the opposing party (ben)
In the video above where he and Neil are basically debating he obviously loses.
The second video the hour long video if you pause to read the shit he posts on the screen. He is literally showing pictures of sourced factual stuff. In terms he does relate his evidence to prior things Shapiro has said. But in a satire sense.
RE: Ben Shapiro Gets Destroyed by BBC But Wait There's MORE! - BTC - Jun 29, 2019
(Jun 29, 2019 08:39 AM)T.R.I.N.I.T.Y Wrote: In the video above where he and Neil are basically debating he obviously loses.
I disagree and see this is the problem is you think that is a debate.
I know of Neil Tops very well, in fact most cases I agree with a lot of his view points he has publicly made, definitely a lot more than Shapiro's. But in this interview he definitely fucked up and Ben made it quite clear
(Jun 29, 2019 08:39 AM)T.R.I.N.I.T.Y Wrote: The second video the hour long video if you pause to read the shit he posts on the screen. He is literally showing pictures of sourced factual stuff. In terms he does relate his evidence to prior things Shapiro has said. But in a satire sense.
Sort of. He is still contradicting himself a lot. He is claiming Ben bases his opinions without factual evidence, where as he is doing the same thing in return. I understand full well why this guy would not want to enter a public debate, rather make an hour long video contradicting himself the whole way.
RE: Ben Shapiro Gets Destroyed by BBC But Wait There's MORE! - ๖ۣۜApocalypse - Jun 29, 2019
(Jun 29, 2019 08:28 AM)T.R.I.N.I.T.Y Wrote: The first video is. The bottom video is an hour long video debunking Shapiro for the trash he is.
Are u a special snowflake?
RE: Ben Shapiro Gets Destroyed by BBC But Wait There's MORE! - ToxicInfliction - Jun 29, 2019
(Jun 29, 2019 08:43 AM)๖ۣۜApocalypse Wrote: Are u a special snowflake?
Any one with a clear sense of knowledge knows the amount of incorrect factual claims people like Shapiro make point it out. Even conservatives point it out. It was called trash because these are the types of people who cause the decline in social climate.
Edit: If you eat from MacDonalds' every day you're going to get fat. If you listen to garbage you're head fills with trash.
Another side note: SJWs are retarded this is true. Neofeminism is a delusion. And religion is about as believable as a rainbow with a pot of gold at the end of it.
RE: Ben Shapiro Gets Destroyed by BBC But Wait There's MORE! - ๖ۣۜApocalypse - Jun 29, 2019
(Jun 29, 2019 08:49 AM)T.R.I.N.I.T.Y Wrote: Any one with a clear sense of knowledge knows the amount of incorrect factual claims people like Shapiro make point it out. Even conservatives point it out. It was called trash because these are the types of people who cause the decline in social climate.
Edit: If you eat from MacDonalds' every day you're going to get fat. If you listen to garbage you're head fills with trash.
Just because you disagree with your liberal opinion, that doesn't mean anything.
RE: Ben Shapiro Gets Destroyed by BBC But Wait There's MORE! - BTC - Jun 29, 2019
(Jun 29, 2019 08:49 AM)T.R.I.N.I.T.Y Wrote: Edit: If you eat from MacDonalds' every day you're going to get fat. If you listen to garbage you're head fills with trash.
Another side note: SJWs are retarded this is true. Neofeminism is a delusion. And religion is about as believable as a rainbow with a pot of gold at the end of it.
Sounds like you need to take your own advice buddy.
Correcting all your mistakes would just be a waste of my time and life, but if you read a book you will learn a lot
RE: Ben Shapiro Gets Destroyed by BBC But Wait There's MORE! - ToxicInfliction - Jun 29, 2019
(Jun 29, 2019 08:55 AM)๖ۣۜApocalypse Wrote: Just because you disagree with your liberal opinion, that doesn't mean anything.
I don't align to a political party.
RE: Ben Shapiro Gets Destroyed by BBC But Wait There's MORE! - ๖ۣۜApocalypse - Jun 29, 2019
(Jun 29, 2019 08:57 AM)T.R.I.N.I.T.Y Wrote: I don't align to a political party.
Hahaha!!
What a fucking moron, doesn't even know what he is talking about.
Go back to your safe space if you get offended by the opinion of an orthodox jew.
"Facts don't care about feelings"
RE: Ben Shapiro Gets Destroyed by BBC But Wait There's MORE! - ToxicInfliction - Jun 29, 2019
(Jun 29, 2019 08:56 AM)BTC Wrote: Sounds like you need to take your own advice buddy.
Correcting all your mistakes would just be a waste of my time and life, but if you read a book you will learn a lot
Books are a great source of knowledge. I tend to focus on a lot of Philosophical books. I also tend to research cause with the great tool of my brain I easily weed through the bullshit. So thank you for the recommendation however, I am pretty far into a foundation. Tips hat and bids ye a farewell
(Jun 29, 2019 09:03 AM)๖ۣۜApocalypse Wrote: Hahaha!!
What a fucking moron, doesn't even know what he is talking about.
Go back to your safe space if you get offended by the opinion of an orthodox jew.
"Facts don't care about feelings"
Nah your feelings don't care about facts. c:
RE: Ben Shapiro Gets Destroyed by BBC But Wait There's MORE! - BTC - Jun 29, 2019
(Jun 29, 2019 09:03 AM)T.R.I.N.I.T.Y Wrote: Books are a great source of knowledge. I tend to focus on a lot of Philosophical books. I also tend to research cause with the great tool of my brain I easily weed through the bullshit. So thank you for the recommendation however, I am pretty far into a foundation. *Tips hat and bids ye a farewell*
These are English books?
RE: Ben Shapiro Gets Destroyed by BBC But Wait There's MORE! - DelTex - Jul 6, 2019
(Jun 29, 2019 08:39 AM)T.R.I.N.I.T.Y Wrote: In the video above where he and Neil are basically debating he obviously loses.
The second video the hour long video if you pause to read the shit he posts on the screen. He is literally showing pictures of sourced factual stuff. In terms he does relate his evidence to prior things Shapiro has said. But in a satire sense.
"The point of a debate is convincing the audience that your opinion is correct." ~ google
The very fact that not everyone here is in agreement denies either party the title "winner".