![]() |
|
FUD Crypter Source Code - Printable Version +- Hack Forums (https://hackforums.net) +-- Forum: Marketplace (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=105) +--- Forum: Auxiliary (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=453) +---- Forum: Member Sales Market (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=176) +---- Thread: FUD Crypter Source Code (/showthread.php?tid=6014735) |
FUD Crypter Source Code - Nauhsea - Oct 8, 2019 NOTE: Before Any Inquires And Questions About My Legitimacy, I Will Verify And Showcase Proof Of Legitimacy In A Screenshare Or Action Of Your Choice. MIDDLE MAN ACCEPTED Slushy Protector: - Runtime / Scantime Undetected - Working With Both Native And Manged File Types - Run Key Startup - Process Persistence - Delay Of Execution - Polymorphic Encryption Algorithm - Output Obfuscation - Provided Completely FUD - Plus More Just Ask For A Full Feature List! Screenshots: https://imgur.com/a/OfQyyvf Video Of Crypter In Use: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oj0_5JgnF5g Current Scan: https://spyralscanner.net/result.php?id=lGYeSVWSRt Price: Negotiable Feel Free To PM Me About And Questions And Or Inquiries About The Project! [contract=tid]Start Contract[/contract] RE: FUD Crypter Source Code - Dorothy Gonzales - Oct 8, 2019 that link you sent? Attention Required! | Cloudflare proves nothing it is just signature static scanning oh and the engines submitted by AV vendors on online scan services are NOT normally identical to engines in actual released products. they normally also miss a lot of engine features. some of them still include things like ML and cloud rep but not all do. so..even your static scan proofs is bs enlighten us all on how you know if it is "Completely FUD" at "Runtime" RE: FUD Crypter Source Code - Nauhsea - Oct 8, 2019 (Oct 8, 2019 03:46 PM)Dorothy Gonzales Wrote: that link you sent? Attention Required! | Cloudflare As I stated in the thread, any inquiries and or questions can be handled via PM and displayed externally. Runtime detections are checked via a VM with several snapshots of multiple different AV solution products. Feel free to PM if you have any more inquiries. Scans are done in the video itself as well of an output file then tested. RE: FUD Crypter Source Code - Dorothy Gonzales - Oct 9, 2019 (Oct 8, 2019 04:20 PM)Nauhsea Wrote: As I stated in the thread, any inquiries and or questions can be handled via PM and displayed externally. Runtime detections are checked via a VM with several snapshots of multiple different AV solution products. Feel free to PM if you have any more inquiries. Scans are done in the video itself as well of an output file then tested.Why not publically? it's a joke and i feel sorry if anyone actually pays you for it RE: FUD Crypter Source Code - Nauhsea - Oct 9, 2019 (Oct 9, 2019 05:01 AM)Dorothy Gonzales Wrote: Why not publically? That's your opinion my friend, you are blatantly toxic. If you don't like my work then learn programming and make your own project. Move on. RE: FUD Crypter Source Code - Dorothy Gonzales - Oct 9, 2019 (Oct 9, 2019 04:22 PM)Nauhsea Wrote: That's your opinion my friend, you are blatantly toxic. If you don't like my work then learn programming and make your own project. Move on.this has nothing to do with my programming background or my own projects. seems i hit a nerve. i wonder why. hhmmm if calling out crappy things being sold makes me toxic then so be it...guilty as charged hehehee RE: FUD Crypter Source Code - Nauhsea - Oct 9, 2019 (Oct 9, 2019 04:23 PM)Dorothy Gonzales Wrote: this has nothing to do with my programming background or my own projects. seems i hit a nerve. i wonder why. hhmmm Hit a nerve? So apparently someone thinks they are all that? The project is far from "crappy" in your own words, I doubt you've even had any experience in the field. You're far from who that ego you try to present. Lets see some of your projects, and not that copy and paste Cs:Go shit. :) RE: FUD Crypter Source Code - Dorothy Gonzales - Oct 9, 2019 (Oct 9, 2019 04:28 PM)Nauhsea Wrote: Hit a nerve? So apparently someone thinks they are all that? The project is far from "crappy" in your own words, I doubt you've even had any experience in the field. You're far from who that ego you try to present. Lets see some of your projects, and not that copy and paste Cs:Go Clay Davis. :)very easy to make you emotional. all one must do is disrespect a project of yours. a sane, mentally robust person...would just ignore it and move on. you can doubt I have experience in the field. that is alright. I can handle that ideology. except none of that is relevant to the discussion of...smoke and mirrors in your marketing & trash being sold. keep changing the topic to being about me but it doesn't hide what is going on here...Clay Davis. :) edit "Nauhsea [newb@HF:] Online (Viewing Profile of Dorothy Gonzales @ 12:29 AM)" meanwhile acts no nerve was touched |