Hack Forums
Ombra has Disputed a Contract with QueensC ( 4867277 ) - Printable Version

+- Hack Forums (https://hackforums.net)
+-- Forum: Marketplace (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=105)
+--- Forum: Bazaar (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=450)
+---- Forum: Deal Disputes (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=111)
+---- Thread: Ombra has Disputed a Contract with QueensC ( 4867277 ) (/showthread.php?tid=6122002)



Ombra has Disputed a Contract with QueensC ( 4867277 ) - Ombra - Nov 18, 2020

Contract Link: https://hackforums.net/contracts.php?action=view&cid=234608
Disputed Member: https://hackforums.net/member.php?action=profile&uid=4867277

The user refused to use Shoppy to purchase my guide and asked me to make a contract manually.

He sent me a transaction that turned to be invalid and has been deleted few minutes after being created, but I had already provided him access to the guide.

Transaction hash: https://www.blockchain.com/btc/tx/fd14b8146c689baafe012e280d2b57c8ff45c1c23968ce634f6ed3e046db5fe0

DO NOT ACCEPT MANUAL PAYMENTS FROM HIM.


RE: Ombra has Disputed a Contract with QueensC ( 4867277 ) - account_ - Nov 18, 2020

https://hackforums.net/showthread.php?tid=6121783&highlight=4867277
https://hackforums.net/showthread.php?tid=6121956&highlight=4867277
https://hackforums.net/showthread.php?tid=6121934&highlight=4867277
https://hackforums.net/showthread.php?tid=6122001
https://hackforums.net/showthread.php?tid=6122002


RE: Ombra has Disputed a Contract with QueensC ( 4867277 ) - Dorrance - Nov 18, 2020

So we are looking at an exit scammer? Cheating blockchain wild.

Sorry Ombra.


RE: Ombra has Disputed a Contract with QueensC ( 4867277 ) - Ombra - Nov 18, 2020

(Nov 18, 2020 04:51 PM)account_ Wrote:  https://hackforums.net/showthread.php?tid=6121783&highlight=4867277
https://hackforums.net/showthread.php?tid=6121956&highlight=4867277
https://hackforums.net/showthread.php?tid=6121934&highlight=4867277

https://hackforums.net/showthread.php?tid=6122002

Just another one on the list.
Personally I'm not concerned about the loss I had to face. I know it was possible but I never faced a transaction that turned to be invalid, now I know how to deal with them.


RE: Ombra has Disputed a Contract with QueensC ( 4867277 ) - account_ - Nov 18, 2020

(Nov 18, 2020 04:54 PM)Ombra Wrote:  Just another one on the list.
Personally I'm not concerned about the loss I had to face. I know it was possible but I never faced a transaction that turned to be invalid, now I know how to deal with them.

yeah thats the positive from the experience. learn from it, move on, sorry for your loss Ombra.


RE: Ombra has Disputed a Contract with QueensC ( 4867277 ) - Blogger - Nov 18, 2020

Not even an exit scammer. He joined with the purpose of scamming. I'm guessing a multi.


RE: Ombra has Disputed a Contract with QueensC ( 4867277 ) - SIM-4831178 - Nov 18, 2020

Mate you see a 2 sat/B transaction. It's not SUPER OBVIOUS that you'll get a double spend?
(Fee 0.00000452 BTC
(2.009 sat/B - 0.502 sat/WU - 225 bytes)


RE: Ombra has Disputed a Contract with QueensC ( 4867277 ) - Ombra - Nov 18, 2020

(Nov 18, 2020 05:56 PM)Decentralized Wrote:  Mate you see a 2 sat/B transaction. It's not SUPER OBVIOUS that you'll get a double spend?
(Fee 0.00000452 BTC
(2.009 sat/B - 0.502 sat/WU - 225 bytes)

I've been ingenuous. It's not uncommon for me to see transactions with low fees and have them confirmed at the end.
This time it went differently and I learned from it.


RE: Ombra has Disputed a Contract with QueensC ( 4867277 ) - PsyDovah - Nov 18, 2020

(Nov 18, 2020 06:12 PM)Ombra Wrote:  I've been ingenuous. It's not uncommon for me to see transactions with low fees and have them confirmed at the end.
This time it went differently and I learned from it.

Should always wait until 1 confirmation before sending your product/service, thankfully this is a lesson learned.. imagine scamming $15 lmao.


RE: Ombra has Disputed a Contract with QueensC ( 4867277 ) - Nitrix - Nov 18, 2020

Sorry about this mate. Try to be aware of the community alerts on the marketplace discussions , that could avoid this kind of stuff happening