Contract Link: https://hackforums.net/contracts.php?act...cid=234608
Disputed Member: https://hackforums.net/member.php?action...id=4867277
The user refused to use Shoppy to purchase my guide and asked me to make a contract manually.
He sent me a transaction that turned to be invalid and has been deleted few minutes after being created, but I had already provided him access to the guide.
Transaction hash: https://www.blockchain.com/btc/tx/fd14b8...e046db5fe0
DO NOT ACCEPT MANUAL PAYMENTS FROM HIM.
Nov 18, 2020 04:51 PM
(This post was last modified: Nov 18, 2020 04:53 PM by account_.)
So we are looking at an exit scammer? Cheating blockchain wild.
Sorry Ombra.
(Nov 18, 2020 04:51 PM)account_ Wrote: https://hackforums.net/showthread.php?ti...ht=4867277
https://hackforums.net/showthread.php?ti...ht=4867277
https://hackforums.net/showthread.php?ti...ht=4867277
https://hackforums.net/showthread.php?tid=6122002
Just another one on the list.
Personally I'm not concerned about the loss I had to face. I know it was possible but I never faced a transaction that turned to be invalid, now I know how to deal with them.
(Nov 18, 2020 04:54 PM)Ombra Wrote: Just another one on the list.
Personally I'm not concerned about the loss I had to face. I know it was possible but I never faced a transaction that turned to be invalid, now I know how to deal with them.
yeah thats the positive from the experience. learn from it, move on, sorry for your loss Ombra.
Not even an exit scammer. He joined with the purpose of scamming. I'm guessing a multi.
Mate you see a 2 sat/B transaction. It's not SUPER OBVIOUS that you'll get a double spend?
(Fee 0.00000452 BTC
(2.009 sat/B - 0.502 sat/WU - 225 bytes)
"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks."
SN, I'll hodl till the end.
(Nov 18, 2020 05:56 PM)SIM-4831178 Wrote: Mate you see a 2 sat/B transaction. It's not SUPER OBVIOUS that you'll get a double spend?
(Fee 0.00000452 BTC
(2.009 sat/B - 0.502 sat/WU - 225 bytes)
I've been ingenuous. It's not uncommon for me to see transactions with low fees and have them confirmed at the end.
This time it went differently and I learned from it.
(Nov 18, 2020 06:12 PM)Ombra Wrote: I've been ingenuous. It's not uncommon for me to see transactions with low fees and have them confirmed at the end.
This time it went differently and I learned from it.
Should always wait until 1 confirmation before sending your product/service, thankfully this is a lesson learned.. imagine scamming $15 lmao.
Sorry about this mate. Try to be aware of the community alerts on the marketplace discussions , that could avoid this kind of stuff happening
|
![[Image: Lw5BVVZ.gif]](https://i.imgur.com/Lw5BVVZ.gif)
![[Image: n5Mnml1G_o.png]](https://images2.imgbox.com/42/5f/n5Mnml1G_o.png)
