+- Hack Forums (https://hackforums.net)
+-- Forum: Tech (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=444)
+--- Forum: Coding (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=151)
+---- Forum: Software Development (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=118)
+---- Thread: [C#] [VB - C#] UDP Flood Fucntion (For RAT Thread) (/showthread.php?tid=773370)
[VB - C#] UDP Flood Fucntion (For RAT Thread) - xSilent - Oct 27, 2010
This is a UDP flood function I made, have fun.
Spoiler (Click to View)
![[Image: c6bac4ba1f4390fea3595205f32435c8.png]](https://gyazo.com/c6bac4ba1f4390fea3595205f32435c8.png)
![[Image: 7ba473ab5aad562644d2cf4b916e020e.png]](https://gyazo.com/7ba473ab5aad562644d2cf4b916e020e.png)
![[Image: 7a3ccbef2aef57c8aa0e0633fad28651.png]](https://gyazo.com/7a3ccbef2aef57c8aa0e0633fad28651.png)
![[Image: 4735de5b850a884d6ef55e247effc971.png]](https://gyazo.com/4735de5b850a884d6ef55e247effc971.png)
You have my rat tutorial, how to use flags with flags and this. So this should get you going for your own rat.
* - Willem - Oct 28, 2010
Hey thank you for this. Just what I needed =D
* - GoldStar - Oct 28, 2010
some remarks, last line in the try statement is sleep, and catch is a sleep also, so you can put one after the end try if your gonna sleep anyway.
i suggest that you remove that boolean, loop infinitly, and the sub stopflooding would abort all threads.
Edit : forgot to say thnks for the contribution ^^
* - xSilent - Oct 28, 2010
(Oct 28, 2010 02:20 PM)Miharbi-DoNo Wrote: some remarks, last line in the try statement is sleep, and catch is a sleep also, so you can put one after the end try if your gonna sleep anyway.
i suggest that you remove that boolean, loop infinitly, and the sub stopflooding would abort all threads.
Edit : forgot to say thnks for the contribution ^^
If you use a boolean and if it becomes false then the thread will abort itself and I forgot about the sleep thing so thanks for that.
* - GoldStar - Oct 28, 2010
(Oct 28, 2010 02:25 PM)xSilent Wrote: If you use a boolean and if it becomes false then the thread will abort itself and I forgot about the sleep thing so thanks for that.
yeah it's almost the same^^ but with a boolean thread will finish the code and exit. but aborting the thread will shutdown flooding where ever it is (sending, sleeping...) it gives it a bit of precision.
* - Joseph Ducreux - Oct 28, 2010
why do you post picture's OP why dont you just post the code..
Only reason why I dont +rep
* - xSilent - Oct 28, 2010
(Oct 28, 2010 10:11 PM)Ubuntu-10.10(is god) Wrote: why do you post picture's OP why dont you just post the code..
Only reason why I dont +rep
So people can't be lazy and copy and paste then call it there's.
And is you saying that's the reason you don't +rep supposed to break my heart or something?
* - BaussHacker - Oct 28, 2010
One thing for while.
You can just use while (KeepFlooding)
instead putting == true.
while (KeepFlooding) is equal to while (KeepFlooding == true)
while (!KeepFlooding) is equal to while (KeepFlooding == false)
:)
But nice thought, I like ur tuts etc. alot, because ur posting exampel for VB + C#, wich will
help away more for peoples, because they will see the 2 synthax different and how you can do it in
both languages :P
* - spookyman166 - Jan 6, 2011
if you really want to stop people c+p this then you need to water mark the images so that only a human can distinguish it. if you get what i mean.
Also this is nice code. But i would suggest a timer or two in there. Would eat less CPU and memory that making so many threads.
* - faddd - Jan 12, 2016
what its is shit ss isint avibile
* - theDIVISION - Jan 12, 2016
(Jan 12, 2016 03:50 PM)faddd Wrote: what its is shit ss isint avibile
If you look at the date it was originally posted, it was 6 years ago.
That could be one of the reasons why it is not working.
The gravedig is strong with this one lol.
If it wasn't your first post, I would actually suggest learning sockets and WebRequests.
* - Odus - Jan 12, 2016
(Jan 12, 2016 03:54 PM)theDIVISION Wrote: If you look at the date it was originally posted, it was 6 years ago.
OP's still active, he might update the thread.
* - theDIVISION - Jan 12, 2016
(Jan 12, 2016 06:29 PM)Odus Wrote: OP's still active, he might update the thread.
You're right, OP is still active but the way the problem was put, he was frustrated that this 6 year old code is not working. Also, the use of vulgar language for no reason or well, the attempt to lol