Ownz Crypter NOT infected [READ] Fucking READ - Printable Version +- Hack Forums (https://hackforums.net) +-- Forum: Hacks, Exploits, and Various Discussions (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=45) +--- Forum: Blackhat • Red Team • Offensive Security (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=447) +---- Forum: Hacking Tools and Programs (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=10) +---- Thread: Ownz Crypter NOT infected [READ] Fucking READ (/showthread.php?tid=955453)

Ownz Crypter NOT infected [READ] Fucking READ - Dawncore - Jan 6, 2011 OMFG, This is not infected the guy that said it was scanned 'BORLO' and that is the stub, The stub was not FUD so it gets fucking detected PROOF! The Crypter itself: The Stub (Borlo): /discuss🎉 * - CATMAN - Jan 6, 2011 'c6p0 won't update it so fuck it. * - Ace Boogie - Jan 6, 2011 Who ever said it was infected, no, it isn't infected, I have used it many times and it worked like charm however, many people scan the crypter on Virus Total and other websites, they are just retards therefore the crypter will be detected much quicker. * - Dawncore - Jan 6, 2011 Well the crypter is now 7/16 on NoVirusThanks 😉 * - iolaka - Jan 6, 2011 c6p0 should make it so it blocks you from visitting virustotal.com while the stub is on your computer(Host editting) That would prevent the stub from getting detected. * - The MammoTh - Jan 6, 2011 Bad version :P upload it to virustotal for the people that want it * - Peltraw - Jan 6, 2011 The guy who considered Ownz Crypter to be infected didn't scan the stub. His firewall just blocked an outgoing connection from the builder, which seems a bit weird. Read the thread. * - Dawncore - Jan 6, 2011 I read the thread he clearly stated he scanned the stub. * - Peltraw - Jan 6, 2011 Read the whole thread. As mentioned before, several firewalls blocked outgoing connections from the crypter. + Check out the annubis scan. (Seems like the builder is running some kind of anti) Yeh, he scanned the stub. Sorry on that one. c(: It's still kind of suspicious to me. Well, if you trust it, it's alright. :) * - TickTack - Jan 6, 2011 Anti's shouldn't be suspicious. My booter had a wireshark anti so users couldn't steal all the shells. * - Ruinedsaint - Jan 6, 2011 Stupid people will upload it on virustotal. Instead I use BlackShader's scanner. Easy to use, no distribution. In addition when I try to crypt my server files and run it afterwards for test, it doesn't work regardless if it's detected or not. Sigh * - іnxy - Jan 6, 2011 Who ever said it was infected? 0_0 * - lilacscripts - Jan 6, 2011 0wnz crypter is really old now, we need another good one