[Dawncore]

OMFG, This is not infected the guy that said it was scanned 'BORLO' and that is the stub,

The stub was not FUD so it gets fucking detected

PROOF!

The Crypter itself:



The Stub (Borlo):



/discuss🎉

[CATMAN]

'c6p0 won't update it so fuck it.

[Ace Boogie]

Who ever said it was infected, no, it isn't infected, I have used it many times and it worked like charm however, many people scan the crypter on Virus Total and other websites, they are just retards therefore the crypter will be detected much quicker.

[Dawncore]

Well the crypter is now 7/16 on NoVirusThanks 😉

[iolaka]

c6p0 should make it so it blocks you from visitting virustotal.com while the stub is on your computer(Host editting)
That would prevent the stub from getting detected.

[The MammoTh]

Bad version :P upload it to virustotal for the people that want it

[Peltraw]

The guy who considered Ownz Crypter to be infected didn't scan the stub. His firewall just blocked an outgoing connection from the builder, which seems a bit weird. Read the thread.

[Dawncore]

I read the thread he clearly stated he scanned the stub.

[Peltraw]

Read the whole thread.
As mentioned before, several firewalls blocked outgoing connections from the crypter.
+ Check out the annubis scan. (Seems like the builder is running some kind of anti)
Yeh, he scanned the stub. Sorry on that one. c(:
It's still kind of suspicious to me. Well, if you trust it, it's alright. :)

[TickTack]

Anti's shouldn't be suspicious. My booter had a wireshark anti so users couldn't steal all the shells.

[Ruinedsaint]

Stupid people will upload it on virustotal. Instead I use BlackShader's scanner. Easy to use, no distribution. In addition when I try to crypt my server files and run it afterwards for test, it doesn't work regardless if it's detected or not. Sigh

[іnxy]

Who ever said it was infected? 0_0

[lilacscripts]

0wnz crypter is really old now, we need another good one