![]() |
|
[$15] >> Cyber Crypter << | FUD | C++| .NET & Native | USG | Persistent | Startup - Printable Version +- Hack Forums (https://hackforums.net) +-- Forum: Marketplace (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=105) +--- Forum: Premium (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=451) +---- Forum: Cryptography and Encryption Market (https://hackforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=299) +---- Thread: [$15] >> Cyber Crypter << | FUD | C++| .NET & Native | USG | Persistent | Startup (/showthread.php?tid=4986406) |
[$15] >> Cyber Crypter << | FUD | C++| .NET & Native | USG | Persistent | Startup - ๖ۣۜCyber - Sep 13, 2015 The 6 Month Package is currently 15$ off! Purchase 6 Months for just $60! Vouches: Spoiler (Click to View) ![]() Screenshot:
![]() FUD: [IMG]http://www.refud.me/results/w0wrmypjyryguuc9jadshzxxbpsmykh9z6r.png[/IMG] [img]http://refud.me/run/results/nlvwzrek8q.png[/img] Compatible with: Luminosity NanoCore Imminent Monitor DarkComet NJ Stealers Keyloggers B*taBot Andromedra and many more! Code CHANGES:* - Grievous - Sep 13, 2015 Vouch for bae. Really nice crypter 🙂 * - Cole - Sep 13, 2015 Super sick crypter. Huge vouch! * - Armada - Sep 13, 2015 All them vouches, no reviews. 😑 I don't vouch unless I can actually test, in this case I was given the opportunity. I threw this at the following:
My findings are as follows: The crypter is in "Basic" stages, not a TON of features implemented, as of yet. I have spoken with the developer on this matter and supplied my input. IMO Further development is needed. However I find it VERY important to note, my recommendation for this was not to supplement the crypters functionality or subdue its effectiveness by "more features" More so to remain more competitive in the ever evolving cryptographic market. 🤝 As for the encryption itself, among all I found a common variable of 1-2 detection's, both either from NOD or EST. Neither detection's are good, I tried numerous builds, avoiding the commonalities such as icon detection's and assembly error, to no avail. However, the overall detection rate was brought down SUBSTANTIALLY in some cases well over 90%. I highly suspect the existing detection ratio I managed was simply due to the testing phase and having tested this on its primary build stub. I highly recommend this crypter to those who utilize the .net architecture. 🤝 * - Wardow - Sep 13, 2015 Please provide proofs of Runtime FUD, i can scan using my scanner HadronScanner, or you can use http://refud.me/run.php * - ๖ۣۜCyber - Sep 13, 2015 (Sep 13, 2015 01:56 PM)Wardow Wrote: Please provide proofs of Runtime FUD, i can scan using my scanner HadronScanner, or you can use http://refud.me/run.php Alright, I can do that sometime today/tomorrow * - Armada - Sep 13, 2015 (Sep 13, 2015 01:56 PM)Wardow Wrote: Please provide proofs of Runtime FUD, i can scan using my scanner HadronScanner, or you can use http://refud.me/run.php Id do it with one of mine, but no tokens, and my system in bare format at the moment, none of my labs are present. * - ๖ۣۜCyber - Sep 13, 2015 (Sep 13, 2015 02:44 PM)Wardow Wrote: -snip- Thanks for the scans. Thanks for pointing out the spelling errors as well, PM'd my graphics creator about them. * - Wardow - Sep 13, 2015 Will be refuding this for now, hope it turn out good :) * - ๖ۣۜCyber - Sep 13, 2015 Crypter has been refuded Updated scan link coming in a few * - Wardow - Sep 13, 2015 Refud enjoy it. [IMG]http://viruscheckmate.com/image/i6qt3aZRD6Q9/full/img.png[/IMG] * - ๖ۣۜCyber - Sep 13, 2015 (Sep 13, 2015 04:01 PM)Wardow Wrote: Refud enjoy it. Thanks for the refud Wardow! * - Ginsum - Sep 13, 2015 Vouch for Cyber and his crypter, pleasant member with plenty of knowledge. * - SIM-1567847 - Sep 13, 2015 Vouch for this man. GLWS. * - zSerity - Sep 13, 2015 Vouch for this great product |