DO NOT DEAL WITH THIS MEMBER
Sep 13, 2015 06:57 PM
(This post was last modified: Sep 13, 2015 06:58 PM by DaPiranha.)
I would like to see a runtime test of this. Also who is the coder? Glws though.
(Sep 13, 2015 06:57 PM)DaPiranha Wrote: I would like to see a runtime test of this. Also who is the coder? Glws though.
Bought the source from one of my friends, I'll be selling the product.
Wardow will be the one refud'ing as well as adding any functions that are requested.
Vouch for Ryan he is a baboon irl.
DO NOT DEAL WITH THIS MEMBER
Sep 13, 2015 07:10 PM
(This post was last modified: Sep 13, 2015 07:37 PM by Malitia.)
Vouch for this product!
GLWS!
Sep 13, 2015 07:50 PM
(This post was last modified: Sep 13, 2015 07:51 PM by ๖ۣۜCyber.)
(Sep 13, 2015 11:17 AM)Grievous Wrote: Vouch for bae.
Really nice crypter 🙂 Thanks mate!
(Sep 13, 2015 11:26 AM)Cole Wrote: Super sick crypter. Huge vouch! I appreciate it bro.
(Sep 13, 2015 06:20 PM)Ginsum Wrote: Vouch for Cyber and his crypter, pleasant member with plenty of knowledge. Thanks I appreciate the compliment
(Sep 13, 2015 01:48 PM)Armada Wrote: All them vouches, no reviews. 😑
I don't vouch unless I can actually test, in this case I was given the opportunity.
I threw this at the following:- Luminosity Link
- Imminent Monitor 3
- Nanocore
- Ozone
- Babylon
- njRAT
My findings are as follows:
The crypter is in "Basic" stages, not a TON of features implemented, as of yet. I have spoken with the developer on this matter and supplied my input. IMO Further development is needed. However I find it VERY important to note, my recommendation for this was not to supplement the crypters functionality or subdue its effectiveness by "more features"
More so to remain more competitive in the ever evolving cryptographic market. 🤝
As for the encryption itself, among all I found a common variable of 1-2 detection's, both either from NOD or EST. Neither detection's are good, I tried numerous builds, avoiding the commonalities such as icon detection's and assembly error, to no avail. However, the overall detection rate was brought down SUBSTANTIALLY in some cases well over 90%.
I highly suspect the existing detection ratio I managed was simply due to the testing phase and having tested this on its primary build stub.
I highly recommend this crypter to those who utilize the .net architecture. 🤝 Thanks for the review armada.
(Sep 13, 2015 06:43 PM)SIM-1567847 Wrote: Vouch for this man.
GLWS.
Thanks mate.
(Sep 13, 2015 06:52 PM)zSerity Wrote: Vouch for this great product
Thanks bro.
(Sep 13, 2015 07:02 PM)afk0 Wrote: Vouch for Ryan he is a baboon irl.
That is very true.
(Sep 13, 2015 07:10 PM)Malitia Wrote: Vouch for this
GLWS!
Thanks buddy.
Screenshot possible please ?
Good luck
DO NOT DEAL WITH THIS MEMBER
Vouch for OP. He is a good guy and trusted member :)
Sep 13, 2015 09:25 PM
(This post was last modified: Sep 13, 2015 09:25 PM by ๖ۣۜCyber.)
(Sep 13, 2015 09:23 PM)©Ratatouille™ Wrote: Screenshot possible please ?
Good luck
Edited the GUI a little today, I can post some screenshots tomorrow.
Vouch for Cyber, good product. 10/10
All I can say is this thing is great! Wardow, is good at refuding and this is a awesome product! Vouch!
C\C++\ASM Programmer. Looking for Jobs
Amazing crypter right here, if you need anything FUD I recommend this product.
Really nice crypter you have here mate.
And the more of it, is native! 👍
DO NOT DEAL WITH THIS MEMBER
[img]http://refud.me/run/results/gokzhis04t.png[/img]
Current Runtime Scan :)
Options used:
Startup/Install
File Crypter:
Darkcomet Server
------
Runtime result is fud without startup.
Vouch for this noob
nice crypter
DO NOT DEAL WITH THIS MEMBER
GUI looking sexy.
I helped him a bit with the color 🙂
|
![[Image: tIUCpQ.gif]](https://vgy.me/tIUCpQ.gif)
