Sep 13, 2015 11:16 AM
(This post was last modified: Oct 6, 2015 07:12 PM by ๖ۣۜCyber.)
The 6 Month Package is currently 15$ off! Purchase 6 Months for just $60!
Vouches:
(Sep 13, 2015 11:17 AM)Grievous Wrote: Vouch for bae.
Really nice crypter 🙂
(Sep 13, 2015 11:26 AM)Cole Wrote: Super sick crypter. Huge vouch!
(Sep 13, 2015 06:20 PM)Ginsum Wrote: Vouch for Cyber and his crypter, pleasant member with plenty of knowledge.
(Sep 13, 2015 01:48 PM)Armada Wrote: All them vouches, no reviews. 😑
I don't vouch unless I can actually test, in this case I was given the opportunity.
I threw this at the following:- Luminosity Link
- Imminent Monitor 3
- Nanocore
- Ozone
- Babylon
- njRAT
My findings are as follows:
The crypter is in "Basic" stages, not a TON of features implemented, as of yet. I have spoken with the developer on this matter and supplied my input. IMO Further development is needed. However I find it VERY important to note, my recommendation for this was not to supplement the crypters functionality or subdue its effectiveness by "more features"
More so to remain more competitive in the ever evolving cryptographic market. 🤝
As for the encryption itself, among all I found a common variable of 1-2 detection's, both either from NOD or EST. Neither detection's are good, I tried numerous builds, avoiding the commonalities such as icon detection's and assembly error, to no avail. However, the overall detection rate was brought down SUBSTANTIALLY in some cases well over 90%.
I highly suspect the existing detection ratio I managed was simply due to the testing phase and having tested this on its primary build stub.
I highly recommend this crypter to those who utilize the .net architecture. 🤝
(Sep 13, 2015 06:43 PM)SIM-1567847 Wrote: Vouch for this man.
GLWS.
(Sep 13, 2015 06:52 PM)zSerity Wrote: Vouch for this great product
(Sep 13, 2015 07:02 PM)afk0 Wrote: Vouch for Ryan he is a baboon irl.
(Sep 13, 2015 07:10 PM)Malitia Wrote: Vouch for this
GLWS! (Sep 14, 2015 01:50 PM)Yore Wrote: ayy this cyber guy, i heard he doin' real good stuff. cus yes, he is.
he be doin' all kinds of good products, ain't no one hesitating to buy his stuff - high quality I'm tellin y'all
(Sep 14, 2015 01:48 PM)Grievous Wrote: GUI looking sexy.
I helped him a bit with the color 🙂
(Sep 14, 2015 05:23 AM)The Sly Wrote: Vouch for this noob
nice crypter
(Sep 13, 2015 09:55 PM)eCoLoGy Wrote: Really nice crypter you have here mate.
And the more of it, is native! 👍
(Sep 13, 2015 09:52 PM)Maximum Wrote: Amazing crypter right here, if you need anything FUD I recommend this product.
(Sep 13, 2015 09:32 PM)Russ. Wrote: All I can say is this thing is great! Wardow, is good at refuding and this is a awesome product! Vouch!
(Sep 13, 2015 09:26 PM)biscuit deluxe Wrote: Vouch for Cyber, good product. 10/10 (Sep 13, 2015 09:24 PM)shooky Wrote: Vouch for OP. He is a good guy and trusted member :)
![[Image: R4w8PP5.jpg]](https://imgur.com/R4w8PP5.jpg)
DO NOT DEAL WITH THIS MEMBER
Vouch for bae.
Really nice crypter 🙂
Super sick crypter. Huge vouch!
DO NOT DEAL WITH THIS MEMBER
All them vouches, no reviews. 😑
I don't vouch unless I can actually test, in this case I was given the opportunity.
I threw this at the following: - Luminosity Link
- Imminent Monitor 3
- Nanocore
- Ozone
- Babylon
- njRAT
My findings are as follows:
The crypter is in "Basic" stages, not a TON of features implemented, as of yet. I have spoken with the developer on this matter and supplied my input. IMO Further development is needed. However I find it VERY important to note, my recommendation for this was not to supplement the crypters functionality or subdue its effectiveness by "more features"
More so to remain more competitive in the ever evolving cryptographic market. 🤝
As for the encryption itself, among all I found a common variable of 1-2 detection's, both either from NOD or EST. Neither detection's are good, I tried numerous builds, avoiding the commonalities such as icon detection's and assembly error, to no avail. However, the overall detection rate was brought down SUBSTANTIALLY in some cases well over 90%.
I highly suspect the existing detection ratio I managed was simply due to the testing phase and having tested this on its primary build stub.
I highly recommend this crypter to those who utilize the .net architecture. 🤝
DO NOT DEAL WITH THIS MEMBER
Please provide proofs of Runtime FUD, i can scan using my scanner HadronScanner, or you can use http://refud.me/run.php
(Sep 13, 2015 01:56 PM)Wardow Wrote: Please provide proofs of Runtime FUD, i can scan using my scanner HadronScanner, or you can use http://refud.me/run.php
Alright, I can do that sometime today/tomorrow
DO NOT DEAL WITH THIS MEMBER
(Sep 13, 2015 01:56 PM)Wardow Wrote: Please provide proofs of Runtime FUD, i can scan using my scanner HadronScanner, or you can use http://refud.me/run.php
Id do it with one of mine, but no tokens, and my system in bare format at the moment, none of my labs are present.
Sep 13, 2015 02:56 PM
(This post was last modified: Sep 13, 2015 06:12 PM by ๖ۣۜCyber.)
(Sep 13, 2015 02:44 PM)Wardow Wrote: -snip-
Thanks for the scans.
Thanks for pointing out the spelling errors as well, PM'd my graphics creator about them.
DO NOT DEAL WITH THIS MEMBER
Will be refuding this for now, hope it turn out good :)
Sep 13, 2015 04:00 PM
(This post was last modified: Sep 14, 2015 02:39 PM by ๖ۣۜCyber.)
Crypter has been refuded
Updated scan link coming in a few
DO NOT DEAL WITH THIS MEMBER
(Sep 13, 2015 04:01 PM)Wardow Wrote: Refud enjoy it.
[IMG]http://viruscheckmate.com/image/i6qt3aZRD6Q9/full/img.png[/IMG]
Thanks for the refud Wardow!
Vouch for Cyber and his crypter, pleasant member with plenty of knowledge.
too many "crypto enthusiast" here
too many "uneducated swines" here
subtle difference? i dont think so.
Vouch for this man.
GLWS.
Vouch for this great product
|