Do not use nodistribute.com, use razor scan only if you use a paid crypter.
No they do not.
I've tested myself scanning a FUD server everyday for 3 months, and its still FUD to this day.
This is old news nodistribute does in fact distribute
To everyone:
They don't send anything
And haven't since at least when they created there own crypter..
Do you think that they would send samples with there own crypter ?
(May 20, 2014 02:57 PM)Razοr Wrote: 1. 46 (I think, correct me if i am wrong) detected it. That's 2/3 not 1/2.
2. For some AVs I disabled warning messages (PUA warnings) and such appear on the Eicar file as it's no real virus - reasons for that where that every file compiled with MingW i.e. gets a PUA warning on 3. AVs - now tell all the people that use MingW that they will never recieve a FUD result because of a warning message that doesn't even stop the program from executing.
4. There is a possibility that an AV still fails to detect such samples - scan it on virus total and you will see that not all AVs pick it up - they should, but well we all should know that AVs never really do their job correctly.
Also timeouts can happen, old AVs as VBA are slow as fuck sometimes - I will not let any AV scan longer then 90 secs - and yes timeout happen, I guess not in this case. Anyway you can ALWAYS and on EACH online AV Scanner (doesn't matter if distributing or not)
have inaccurate results, period.
I never said your scanner or Scan4You distributes, I just say that IF there would be such issues Scan4You would be responsible and not your scanner. Neither did I attack you and your products. Your reaction changes my entire mind on you. I have seen as concurrency so far, not anymore now. I can't take people with such immature reactions serious.
Edit:
Just scanned, 47 are actually detecting it:
Result: (47/60)
A-Squared(Emisoft AntiMalware) EICAR-Test-File (not a virus) (B)
Agnitum Clean - Nothing Found
AhnLab V3 Internet Security Malware detected
ArcaVir ERROR: No FilesFolders Found.
Avast EICAR Test-NOT virus!!!
Avg vir.EICAR_Test
Avira Eicar-Test-Signature virus!
Ad-Aware EICAR (v)
Baidu AV Clean - Nothing Found
BitDefender Malware detected
BKav vir.EICAR_Test/A
BullGuard Internet Security EICAR-Test-File (not a virus)
ByteHero Potential Virus
ClamAv Eicar-Test-Signature
Comodo ApplicUnwnt@#2975xfk8s2pq1
Total Defense IS the EICAR test string
Dr. Web EICAR Test File (NOT a Virus!)
eScan Clean - Nothing Found
eTrust-Vet vir.EICAR_Test/A
eScan Internet Security Suite 14 EICAR-Test-File (DB)
ESET NOD32 @Teststring.Eicar
Fortinet Clean - Nothing Found
Fprot Malware detected
FSB Antivirus doslegacy/EICAR_Test_file_not_a_virus!
F-Secure EICAR_Test_File
Gdata Malware detected
Ikarus EICAR-ANTIVIRUS-TESTFILE
Immunet Antivirus EICAR:EICAR_Test_file_not_a_virus-tpd
IObit Malware Fighter Clean - Nothing Found
K7Ultimate EICAR_Test_File
Kaspersky Internet Security 2013 EICAR-Test-File
KingSoft Clean - Nothing Found
mcafee EICAR test file
Microsoft Security Essentials Virus:DOS/EICAR_Test_File
nProtect EICAR-Test-File
NANO Antivirus Malware detected
Netgate Clean - Nothing Found
Norton Internet Security EICAR Test String
Norman doslegacy/EICAR_Test_file_not_a_virus!
Outpost Security Suite Pro EICAR_test_file (Virus)
Ozone AV Clean - Nothing Found
Panda Antivirus EICAR-AV-TEST-FILE
Panda Cloud Malware detected
PC Tools Malware detected
Quick Heal EICAR.TestFile
SUPERAntiSpyware Clean - Nothing Found
Solo Clean - Nothing Found
TotalDefense doslegacy/EICAR_Test_file_not_a_virus!
Trendmicro Internet Security Malware detected
TrustPort Antivirus 2014 Clean - Nothing Found
Twister Antivirus 8 EICAR.Test.File.zewa
Unthreat AntiVirus BE Malware detected
Vba 32 EICAR-Test-File
Vexira Malware detected
Vipre Internet Security 2013 EICAR (v)
VirIT Clean - Nothing Found
Webroot Clean - Nothing Found
Zillya Malware detected
Zoner doslegacy/EICAR_Test_file_not_a_virus!
360 @Teststring.Eicar
Filename: eicar.com
File MD5 Hash: 44d88612fea8a8f36de82e1278abb02f
File SHA1: e75f19015f7416ecced3cd32c4f7165db4dd8ade
File Size: 68 Bytes
Time Scanned: 20-05-14, 10:07:34
Scan provided by RazorScanner
Link to Scan: http://razorscanner.com/result.php?id=408925
That it's ~80%. Weird with 30+ fake AVs, isn't it? Not going to lie but your shit sucks in my opinion too over priced
(May 20, 2014 07:15 PM)Razοr Wrote: Wait :D
It sucks because 1 scan costs 3 cents (and that is the most expensive option)?
Thanks for your opinion, but in my opinion the price is just fine considering I am not only reselling from Scan4You for profit. 🤝
I've been a happy user of RazorScanner for 3 months.
And Its always been more up-to-date than any others.
But I do know that Nodistribute doesn't send samples.
They even have there own crypter.
And they don't use Scan4You API because Scan4you is 35 AV's
Nodistribute is 33-34
(May 20, 2014 11:19 PM)BoomShot Wrote: You don't "know" that, so why state that you do?
Yes.. I did this for VirusTotal, Nodistribute, MetaScan,
All the files where encrypted using privately donated VB6 crypters.
Virustotal: took 1 week & 2 days.
Nodistribute: Was fud for 3 months, 1 week, 5 days, then I used the server.. Now detected 2/60
MetaScan: Was 2+ months (I don't have the exact date).
(May 20, 2014 11:28 PM)BoomShot Wrote: You'll need a lot more proof than just that.
Ill re-create the tests.
Though its going to take a hella long time to get more crypters.
It took months to get those.
I cannot judge whether NoDistribute distributes or not, but all I've seen is that JackDeRips is starting beef
right when he joined this thread. Instead of arguing and discussing these issues of trust, he starts attacking
a third party, that was not involved yet, which would be Razor. Can someone tell me why please?
(May 20, 2014 11:33 PM)Fake User Wrote: I cannot judge whether NoDistribute distributes or not, but all I've seen is that JackDeRips is starting beef.
right when he joined this thread. Instead of arguing and discussing these issues of trust, he starts attacking
a third party, that was not involved yet, which would be Razor. Can someone tell me why please?
I like you, better grammar than most, and actually reads the posts.
I Got something to share about rasorscanner !
I was Testing a RAT so made a server and crypted it and scanned it on Rasorscanner .
I waited 5 Minutes and guess what !!! The server i just scanned on RASORSCANNER called home and connected to My RAT 🤗 Amazing isnt it !
i WAS fast enough to make a screen shot of the connection it made 😠and had a VICTIME With The PC Name JOE MALDIVE Country USA and The IP address : 66.187.149.88
The server disconnected rapidly and after a little research and An IP Whois I cam up with this :✌
NetRange: 66.187.149.80 - 66.187.149.95
CIDR: 66.187.149.80/28
OriginAS: AS22158, AS33327
NetName: THREATGRID-TC
NetHandle: NET-66-187-149-80-1
Parent: NET-66-187-128-0-1
NetType: Reassigned
RegDate: 2013-03-14
Updated: 2013-03-14
Ref: http://whois.arin.net/rest/net/NET-66-187-149-80-1
CustName: ThreatGrid
Address: 100 Broadway, Floor 6
City: New York
StateProv: NY
PostalCode: 10005
Country: US
RegDate: 2013-03-14
Updated: 2013-03-14
Ref: http://whois.arin.net/rest/customer/C03343092
Which Led me to this :🤝
http://www.threatgrid.com/
What Do You Think ?
(Jun 3, 2014 07:35 PM)Anonmoosekaab Wrote: Thanks, I actually made the file to test out scanners that claim they dont distribute. It was worth the wait, I wouldnt scan my stuff on razorscanner/fuckingscan.me unless I was sure it didnt distribute. If anyone has doubts about a scanner do what I did and see for yourself (but remember to use a junk email)
Thanks But believe me I Know What iam Talking about .
The Only Scanner I uploaded My server to WAS RAZORSCANNER .
RAZOR ,jUST Face it Iam going to prove it !
Here Is The ScreenShot Of The RAT AND SERVER i scanned On RAZORSCAMER !
http://i57.[censored].com/2s8me4x.jpg
see t-i-n-y-p-i-c under censored
Sorry never done this before
Wow, I won't be using that site again!
|
