As always, great job Goodies. If only we had more of you.
[Tutorial] ~ Man in the Middle Attack via DHCP Exhaustion on Windows Server 2012 R2 |
|
Apr 21, 2015 08:12 PM
(This post was last modified: Apr 21, 2015 08:13 PM by Hooded Robin.)
(Apr 21, 2015 03:44 PM)phuqer Wrote: As always, great job Goodies. If only we had more of you. i tried to use the recent mod_copy exploit to download and copy him, but all my attempts failed... I think he doesn't use proFTP 🤣
Cool tutorial there mate.. Looking at this, there are many different things that could be done.. DoS attacks against the whole network since we exhaust the DHCP server, exploits will become easier as we get more information about each device with ease, and many more (can't think of them now :D )
So, yeah, bmping because I got a PM regarding this thread... maybe someone else is interested?
SRPP Discord Server
I am a professional network/cloud security architect. My Old Tutorials
May 15, 2015 06:20 PM
(This post was last modified: May 15, 2015 06:21 PM by pomwtin.)
Nice one Goodies :)
Do you maby know how widely "limit per MAC" is used? I give this a go some time ago because of arp poisioning detection, but 2011 year (by other words relatively old) router didnt let me exhaust DHCP completely. So that left me under impression that this kind of attack does not have many chance of suceesing if attacker is not able to reconfigure router. I remembered now when i saw this thread and saw a chance to ask :) Thanks :) 9x HD5970
2X GTX 980Ti GTX 980 GTX 1060 R9 390 Cracking your hashes (May 15, 2015 06:20 PM)pomwtin Wrote: Nice one Goodies :) There are a couple of ways I can interpret this. 1) Limit DHCP Leases per MAC address 2) Limit MAC Address per port as per port security. Well, to answer 1), it's very common to only allow 1 or so DHCP leases per MAC address. I don't even know how you can get multiple. The point of this DHCPig program is to spoof pseudo-random MAC addresses so that no two are the same. As for 2), it's sad how uncommon it is. I very rarely ever see anything compliant with switch security best practices in live environments. In a switch, you should always limit the number of MAC addresses to a small amount (generally 5 to allow for VoIP phones and virtual machines if that's your thing), but it is often a huge hassle in large companies. Basically, any time you switch out a VoIP phone or change your network card, you get a new MAC address, and limiting them to 2 or so means you have to manually go in and override it. This isn't bad in a SMB (small to medium business), but in the corporate environments I work at, it becomes a huge hassle. Does this answer your question at all, or were you asking something else entirely? SRPP Discord Server
I am a professional network/cloud security architect. My Old Tutorials (May 15, 2015 09:33 PM)Dmitriy Wrote: Great tutorial Goodies as always. I'll definitely try this out in the home lab environment. You make a lot of great tutorials, do you have your put together thread with links to all tutorials? that would be great, as it makes so much easier to find something. This thread has a handful of my favorite tutorials of mine. Check it out! [Tutorial Compilation] Goodies' Official Hacking Tutorial Compilation Thread by Goodies SRPP Discord Server
I am a professional network/cloud security architect. My Old Tutorials
Yesterday I migrated a Linux VM to my desktop that had a dhcp server running, so when I spun it up at my uni, I kinda fucked up our network for a bit by complete accident c:
At any rate, It remix died me of this. SRPP Discord Server
I am a professional network/cloud security architect. My Old Tutorials |
|
|



![[Image: boostdroid-signature.gif]](https://boostdroid.com/assets/images/boostdroid-signature.gif)
