(Jan 3, 2012 11:10 PM)Burn™ Wrote: HUGE VOUCH fully fud and awesome customer support would recommend to everyone!
Such a cheap price for so much!
Thanks for the vouch I appreciate it. Spread the word.
(Jan 5, 2012 10:22 AM)Skyline-leo Wrote: so you can not possible take .jar and code html for upload in the personal site??
So the site for infect slave is example: http://www.thisisaanonjdbforinfecttheworld.com?
thanks in advance if is possible explain me :)
Not currently right now but we offer all those services essentially. We have a built in website cloner in the panel along with remote jar creation and other things. We may offer a service soon where we can generate and clone a website for a seperate price from the panel along with a FUD jar file.
(Jan 5, 2012 01:12 PM)DeMoNi Wrote: Hum, if this is FUD and working as stated, shoot me a PM :)
Yes our JAR file's are the most unique and we are constantly making them more unique.
DO NOT DEAL WITH THIS MEMBER
Jan 5, 2012 05:07 PM
(This post was last modified: Jan 5, 2012 05:33 PM by Mr. Ǧotti.)
Did you know?
Our polymorphicly generated Jar files are over 95% Unique!
[img]http://anondb.co.cc/img/compared.png[/img]
This looks great GLWS hope you do well!
DO NOT DEAL WITH THIS MEMBER
Jan 5, 2012 06:29 PM
(This post was last modified: Jan 5, 2012 06:32 PM by Mr. Ǧotti.)
@Alex - Who said I was changing strings only? I add random function code, change the arrangement of the functions and more I won't mention, Don't go thread bashing when you don't know what the fuck your talking about. I haven't came on your thread bashing you, Stay off mine;
Edit: Also, I'm pretty sure you can't compare jar files either, I was just making a post. From what I know the Byte code changes completely on each compilation as it is, even with the same exact code.
@Element - Polymorphism of the compilation and polymorphism of the actual file on runtime are 2 different things.
(Jan 5, 2012 06:29 PM)Mr. Ǧotti Wrote: @Element - Polymorphism of the compilation and polymorphism of the actual file on runtime are 2 different things.
No they're not. Polymorhism on runtime is polymorphism. Unique code on generation is unique code on generation. You need to learn what polymorphic means. It's only polymorphic when the code is editing itself not being made by a generator...
DO NOT DEAL WITH THIS MEMBER
@VisualBasic Malewear - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polymorphic_code , I am well aware of what you have just said. The code does change itself when ran, not near as much as the code changes when generated of course but it is still polymorphic. Why do people on this forum have to bitch so much..:S
(Jan 5, 2012 07:08 PM)Mr. Ǧotti Wrote: @VisualBasic Malewear - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polymorphic_code , I am well aware of what you have just said. The code does change itself when ran, not near as much as the code changes when generated of course but it is still polymorphic. Why do people on this forum have to bitch so much..:S
How does it change on run? I don't mean like variables, the actual instructions have to change.
DO NOT DEAL WITH THIS MEMBER
Jan 5, 2012 07:12 PM
(This post was last modified: Jan 5, 2012 07:13 PM by Mr. Ǧotti.)
Buy the service and i'll tell you anything you want to know. Otherwise its none of your concern. Also, It isnt just variables Lol.
Edit: Thanks for the thread s flamers :D
(Jan 5, 2012 07:12 PM)Mr. Ǧotti Wrote: Buy the service and i'll tell you anything you want to know. Otherwise its none of your concern. Also, It isnt just variables Lol.
Edit: Thanks for the thread s flamers :D
It's just for polymorphism you need some sort of decompiler so the program can get it's own instructions, I was wondering how you did this.
(Jan 5, 2012 06:29 PM)Mr. Ǧotti Wrote: @Element - Polymorphism of the compilation and polymorphism of the actual file on runtime are 2 different things.
No they are not , there is no such thing as polymorphism of compilation , that is called the uniqueness of each generation. Polymorphism if you look it up means it mutates on each run , so it obviously means runtime not each time it is generated , derp.
(Jan 5, 2012 07:59 PM)Element Products Wrote: Ah ok , I find it funny how all these are called java drive by's when really all they are java downloaders , maybe I will make one soon and call it pulymorphik as well.
Please stop posting the spam we are simply here for the sale of our service not for a debate, by the way:
Quote:Drive-by download means three things, each concerning the unintended download of computer software from the Internet:
Downloads which a person authorized but without understanding the consequences (e.g. downloads which install an unknown or counterfeit executable program, ActiveX component, or Java applet).
Any download that happens without a person's knowledge.
Download of spyware, a computer virus or any kind of malware that happens without a person's knowledge.
(Jan 5, 2012 08:10 PM)Lysergic Wrote: Please stop posting the spam we are simply here for the sale of our service not for a debate, by the way:
The java applet isn't without their knowledge as the click what is basically a "do you want to download and run" button.
DO NOT DEAL WITH THIS MEMBER
Jan 5, 2012 08:35 PM
(This post was last modified: Jan 5, 2012 08:35 PM by Mr. Ǧotti.)
@Visual - To a normal user, lets be honest they dont know what it means. Hence to THEIR knowledge they are unknowingly downloading.
(Jan 5, 2012 08:27 PM)VisualBasic Malewear Wrote: The java applet isn't without their knowledge as the click what is basically a "do you want to download and run" button.
I'm not talking about the driveby itself, i'm talking about downloading the malicious software without the user knowing.
DO NOT DEAL WITH THIS MEMBER
@Users back online and ready to accept payments.
Did you know?
-FoxxyJava is easily exploitable by any user who is viewing your systems jar file and is smart enough to download/decomp it. ;)
|
