Home Upgrade Search Memberlist Extras Hacker Tools Award Goals Help Wiki Contact

RazorCrypt ♦ 100% FUD ♦ No .NET Dependencies ♦ Automatic Updating ♦ 20$ Lifetime

(Jun 10, 2012 09:48 AM)FeiJai Wrote:  Ouch, I bought it an hour ago, still not activated.
RazorRat, are you able to activate my HWID? Ebula is not online :(

sry i'm not able to do that.
You license will be activated soon don't worry
I am going to buy this when I get back home either later or tomorrow. I spoke with Ebola on Skype a couple days ago and he said I can take my time and think about if I want it or not. Please save me a copy for $10 if you raise price.
(Jun 10, 2012 09:50 AM)learn Wrote:  This cryptor is HAND DOWN the best cryptor around. No dependency and written in C. Really awesome. Honestly ws getting tired of countless number of .NET cryptors aroudn and none works as claimed (Only for hardly a day)

Very good work buddy ! Keep up the good work!!! Anyone thinking of quality cryptor should not think of anything else - just buy this one. you are gonna thank me for this advice.

Thank you for this advice! :D
How did you know I'll do that? :D


ok guys let me do the next update now. I'll release it in a few minutes.
(Jun 10, 2012 08:13 AM)Ebolа Wrote:  It is still FUD. Make sure you set an icon, and make sure you do not use UPX Packing or .net Crypter settings.

Lol, isn't the idea to be fud without any changes (icon, assembly, etc)?
Also, icon changer and assembly changer would be good to be added since the crypter is not fud .. 😖
[img]http://pscreen.pimg.in/de0673.png[/img] - thats what i get when i try to run a file ive crypted. My slaves get the same thing. Also its 1/37.
Update is out!
Here is the newest scan:
File Info

Report date: 2012-06-10.
Scan Occured: [img]http://metascan.org/result_time.php?t=i&w=Mzk5NDUw[/img]
Link to scan: http://metascan.org/result.php?scan=Mzk5NDUw
File name: LongKey.exe
File size: 1112952 bytes
MD5 Hash: 0e87f83cd2e6ae6f2112b1d7a726682c
SHA1 Hash: 3313448f4c69cf01ac5dbe6893e43bd34b292202
Detection rate: 0 out of 37
Status: CLEAN

Detections

AVG - Clean.
Acavir - Clean.
Avast 5 -Clean.
Avast -Clean.
Avira -Clean.
BitDefender -Clean.
VirusBuster Internet Security -Clean.
Clam Antivirus -Clean.
COMODO Internet Security -Clean.
DrWeb -Clean.
eTrust-Vet -Clean.
F-PROT Antivirus -Clean.
F-Secure Internet Security -Clean.
G Data -Clean.
IKARUS Security-Clean.
Kaspersky Antivirus -Clean.
McAfee -Clean.
MS Security Essentials -Clean.
ESET NOD32 -Clean.
Norman -Clean.
Norton -Clean.
Panda Security -Clean.
A-Squared Security -Clean.
Quick Heal Antivirus -Clean.
Rising Antivirus -Clean.
Solo Antivirus -Clean.
Sophos -Clean.
Trend Micro Internet Security -Clean.
VBA32 Antivirus -Clean.
Vexira Antivirus -Clean.
Webroot Internet Security -Clean.
Zoner AntiVirus -Clean.
Ad-Aware -Clean.
AhnLab V3 Internet Security -Clean.
Bullguard -Clean.
Imunitet -Clean.
Vipre -Clean.

Scan report generated by
MetaScan.org



(Jun 10, 2012 09:59 AM)morbotz Wrote:  Lol, isn't the idea to be fud without any changes (icon, assembly, etc)?
Also, icon changer and assembly changer would be good to be added since the crypter is not fud .. 😖

It already has icon and i'm working on assembly.


(Jun 10, 2012 10:07 AM)Alex™ Wrote:  [img]http://pscreen.pimg.in/de0673.png[/img] - thats what i get when i try to run a file ive crypted. My slaves get the same thing. Also its 1/37.

I think you didn't used a custom icon.
But i solved the problems with this update, i embedded a HQ icon as normal icon.
And don't use .net crypter settings pls!
(Jun 10, 2012 09:38 AM)Razοr Wrote:  I tested it and it works with WinXP.
I think the crypter isn't the problem!

here some of the pc's i tested!

[Image: 7a9bf4e6410a48209f0c97446b38c622.png?1339346041]

I didn't mean that the server does not work in machines with Win XP. I mean that crypting the servers in an WinXP environment could corrupt the servers somehow.

(Jun 10, 2012 09:44 AM)GEZ V2 Wrote:  Hey,
I have also xp-sp3. For me the crypter open and run and crypted my cg-server.
In my Sandboxie the crypted server not work. I sent him run hidden to vics-vista + 7 pc.
Connected! Xp I not check.

Thanks for this information! I think this is what I needed to know.

P.S. Unfortunately I do not have VIC'S where I can test the server, so it would be nice if the servers ran in Sandboxie ..

I will try to buy some intalls to test it.

Thanks for the info!
I will do some test and fix it soon.
Don't worry bro's the crypte will be better with each update!
Wow wasnt even UD and already Update out! gotta love this crypter! :D
The crypter output files do not work in virtual machine or sandboxie
Hi! I have always used .NET settings for all my crypters and this crypter has no .NET dependencies. What would be the correct/idel settings for BS 5.2 and DC 5.x?


(Jun 10, 2012 10:59 AM)Bionicz Wrote:  The crypter output files do not work in virtual machine or sandboxie

Thanks for mentioning this mate, it's good to know. Any other way of testing the server except asking for test installs? I used to always use Sandboxie to test it out.
I like potatoes :3
Anyone comment on the support these guys offer?
(Jun 10, 2012 11:15 AM)Mad0ne Wrote:  Anyone comment on the support these guys offer?

Read the Vouchs/Feedback in the Thread. You should see enough ;)
(Jun 10, 2012 11:15 AM)Mad0ne Wrote:  Anyone comment on the support these guys offer?

I know Ebola personally, he gives great support and I'm even here to help with support if necessary.
RazorCrypter bypassing Kaspersky runtime:




Possibly Related Threads...
Thread / Author Replies Views Last Post
by electrumhvhFeb 3, 2024 04:38 PM 4 434 Feb 3, 2024 04:38 PM
Last Post: Annuit cœptis
by CasualInvestingAug 8, 2022 11:40 PM 177 10,104 Aug 8, 2022 11:40 PM
Last Post: Stanley
by AimDec 31, 2020 07:00 AM 255 10,663 Dec 31, 2020 07:00 AM
Last Post: SenseiB