Great edition as always , thanks for writing !
HF News - 177 |
(Jan 14, 2014 10:23 PM)MATTHEW Wrote: First post? What did I do man? xD I just saw your post and I was like "lolwut" <3
This was another good read. Thank you Sir.
Need A Different Or A NEW PORN WEBSITE!!!WHY??
1. WE GOT PORN 2. WE GOT PORN 3. THERE IS A SPIN WHEEL!!! Visit Mine!! BOO-TUBE
I do understand now who you're working with the post shoutouts. People should just keep in mind that just cause you land on say 50th, you won't keep it. There could be some low quality posts that push your posts down so try not make yourself look foolish by posting that you're the 50th or 100th 🤝
BagHead was the first poster on the 176th edition.
Roger Waters was the 100th poster on the 176th edition. ^I'm seeing very little purpose for these. (Jan 15, 2014 03:03 PM)Vegas Wrote: BagHead was the first poster on the 176th edition.Then how about you read the explanation that was advertised in numerous locations. Perhaps you'll find the answer there. ![]() (Jan 15, 2014 03:28 PM)Oak Wrote: Then how about you read the explanation that was advertised in numerous locations. Yuzuha was the person who hit the 100th post mark first, people starting deleting posts to get the 100th post and that is how it came to be that I was the 100th post. (Jan 15, 2014 04:19 PM)Roger Waters Wrote: Yuzuha was the person who hit the 100th post mark first, people starting deleting posts to get the 100th post and that is how it came to be that I was the 100th post.I'm aware of that. I pick when I close the thread. ![]() (Jan 15, 2014 05:40 PM)#Beau Wrote: I am very understanding of why HF News would want to increase the activity, the more the better. However, I think the acknowledgment of a member's post/debate should be the only entry of getting a shout out. As you have witnessed the users of HF are discussing more on who had gotten the entry to the shout out rather than the breathtaking HF News. Hopefully you reconsider the alteration of the News Notable.Because it's brand new. This is a long-term plan, not a short-term one. ![]() (Jan 15, 2014 03:28 PM)Oak Wrote: Then how about you read the explanation that was advertised in numerous locations. Yeah I get it guy, you mentioned it. My point is that this is a redundant way of getting activity to flourish. Posting for the sake of the count is by no means going to yield quality posts, which is what you're also trying to avoid, no? A better alternative would be to offer a recognition of the most beneficial criticism or the most quoted comment. It should pertain to the quality of the posts, not the quantity of them. This way people have a genuine reason to post something useful rather than just a reason to post. (Jan 15, 2014 06:30 PM)Vegas Wrote: Yeah I get it guy, you mentioned it.Hmm... where have I seen this before? Oh! Perhaps in the explanation. "Another way is to respond both eloquently and intelligently. If your posts stands out above the others in insight, quality, or thought, perhaps you'll be chosen. Examples could be ideas for the HF News, specific responses to the latest happenings, or personal angles on featured stories. -=- Thirdly, major leaders of discussion. If you get into a friendly debate with others on the latest news--from any section or topic--one to all of you could be chosen. Flaming and harassing will not be tolerated. Grow up and learn how to debate with integrity." ![]() |
|
|



![[Image: asWKqqH.gif]](https://i.imgur.com/asWKqqH.gif)

![[Image: 5hqc92A.jpg]](https://i.imgur.com/5hqc92A.jpg)
![[Image: jKPKvc8.jpg]](https://i.imgur.com/jKPKvc8.jpg)