[iloominati]

yall riding understalkers edick to the max 👍

[Fʀᴀɴᴋɪᴇ]

Just cast my vote, good luck to all candidates.

[Orchid]

Laughing because I knew from the moment Understalker was nominated I was indeed toast.

[D3xus]

Understalker has been disqualified from the poll, and is banned from future iterations of the contest. I received sufficient evidence that indicates he was collaborating and asking for votes intentionally (he was going out of his way to ask for votes, and someone was not framing him or doing it on his behalf).

[Retribute]

I voted for Starstruck. Good luck, nominees.

[Sudsy]

Understalker has been disqualified from the poll, and is banned from future iterations of the contest. I received sufficient evidence that indicates he was collaborating and asking for votes intentionally (he was going out of his way to ask for votes, and someone was not framing him or doing it on his behalf).

lol he probably would have won it legit too

[Vinnie]

Understalker has been disqualified from the poll, and is banned from future iterations of the contest. I received sufficient evidence that indicates he was collaborating and asking for votes intentionally (he was going out of his way to ask for votes, and someone was not framing him or doing it on his behalf).

So why am I black listed from MOTM, can you add me so I can win already please? Thanks.

[Understalker]

As long as I see proof I will be happy ok

thnx

[Astute]

Understalker has been disqualified from the poll, and is banned from future iterations of the contest. I received sufficient evidence that indicates he was collaborating and asking for votes intentionally (he was going out of his way to ask for votes, and someone was not framing him or doing it on his behalf).

Can we see proof of this occurring? I'm just curious as to what happened.

[haydrazs]

lol i think its funny how much of a fuck up this motm was though, atleast show the proof? its so easy to fake forreal..

[Roger Waters]

Contributions for this month should be listed for each member like Froggy used to. I looked at some of the "contributions" some members made and aren't really contributions yet they make the poll and people voted for them. Making a thread with a statement in two sentences isn't a contribution.

[D3xus]

If I post a screenshot of the conversations, people will think I faked it (even if they were real). You can fake a Gyazo/puush. To ensure validity, I'd have to add each and every person on Skype and copy the conversations so they know they were valid. That's not something I'm a fan of. If you trust me (and I hope people do) you can PM me for the relevant screenshots.

---

Contributions for this month should be listed for each member like Froggy used to. I looked at some of the "contributions" some members made and aren't really contributions yet they make the poll and people voted for them. Making a thread with a statement in two sentences isn't a contribution.

Froggy removed them because no one ever read them, supposedly. I can add them back if there is a demand for it.

[Roger Waters]

Froggy removed them because no one ever read them, supposedly. I can add them back if there is a demand for it.

I know it's been a while since you've done this but I believe some people do look at them. That's how people can tell that a certain member has made a reasonable contribution or to see who made more contributions or better quality contributions.

[D3xus]

I know it's been a while since you've done this but I believe some people do look at them. That's how people can tell that a certain member has made a reasonable contribution or to see who made more contributions or better quality contributions.

Should I add them for this month or wait until next month?

[Understalker]

I was removed for this, "disqualified" rather, he fucked up the first poll and once the second poll was posted it was stated I was in it.

Regardless, if you think it's fair, sure.

😉