Jun 16, 2018 12:04 PM
(This post was last modified: Jun 16, 2018 12:04 PM by TeraLoad.)
-Minor bug fix on bot communication.
(Jun 16, 2018 11:29 AM)Darzu Wrote: I smell lies from a mile away. 🤣
Please come back when you have actual proof that the bot is "modified from public"
🤝
(Jun 16, 2018 08:30 AM)TeraLoad Wrote: sorry about that, we were about to mention it. anyway, now we have noted it in the main post.
(Jun 16, 2018 11:24 AM)TeraLoad Wrote: completely private, built from scratch
You are contradicting yourself. In the first post you admit to use LiteHTTP panel and then you say its completely private and built from scratch.
(Jun 16, 2018 01:37 PM)RascalPascal Wrote: You are contradicting yourself. In the first post you admit to use LiteHTTP panel and then you say its completely private and built from scratch.
panel and db structure were partly from litehttp, none of the bot itself is from litehttp.
DO NOT DEAL WITH THIS MEMBER
(Jun 16, 2018 07:52 AM)Zettabit Wrote: They probably used it as a base, and then neglected to mention it, like most do. I’m honestly tempted to remove the repository with all the fucking rippers.
In his defense you let your girl LiteHTTP start sliding on Zkylon and look we have another kid called Tera.... Smh.
DO NOT DEAL WITH THIS MEMBER
lol, it kinda does look like both of them had a child, and this is the outcome of it.
-Stability Improvement
-Bug fixes
(Jun 16, 2018 07:52 AM)Zettabit Wrote: They probably used it as a base, and then neglected to mention it, like most do. I’m honestly tempted to remove the repository with all the fucking rippers.
Id agree it does look like litehttp, Especially the task creation page
Can you sell loads of your bot?
please show us dyncheck runtime scan with internet available
(Jun 20, 2018 11:31 AM)adster Wrote: please show us dyncheck runtime scan with internet available
the bot is not fud, nor does it claim to be fud.
nobody would insist on fud, but we have to understand if it has several detections which every bot has, or it has 15/22 detections and totally useless
I'm sure that if you don't want to scam people, you better tell how good is your product.
Can crypt and test your exe if you want, cause I'm interested in good loader
Added on jabber. :) xxxxxxx
(Jun 20, 2018 11:54 AM)adster Wrote: nobody would insist on fud, but we have to understand if it has several detections which every bot has, or it has 15/22 detections and totally useless
I'm sure that if you don't want to scam people, you better tell how good is your product.
Can crypt and test your exe if you want, cause I'm interested in good loader
its like 11/32 uncrypted, but who the hell uses an uncrypted stub!?!
(Jun 20, 2018 12:34 PM)TeraLoad Wrote: its like 11/32 uncrypted, but who the hell uses an uncrypted stub!?! I don't know, you tell me.. and read what I wrote
It seems you don't understand me...
I don't know where you can check runtime scan on 32 Av, at the moment they have only 23
I'm talking about runtime scan! Static scan can be fud, all depends on a crypter, but runtime detections stay :)
Jun 20, 2018 12:52 PM
(This post was last modified: Jun 20, 2018 12:58 PM by TeraLoad.)
(Jun 20, 2018 12:44 PM)adster Wrote: I don't know, you tell me.. and read what I wrote
It seems you don't understand me...
I don't know where you can check runtime scan on 32 Av, at the moment they have only 23
I'm talking about runtime scan! Static scan can be fud, all depends on a crypter, but runtime detections stay :)
nope, a good crypter will make the stub both scantime and runtime.
-Problems with Zone identifier FIXED
-Bug fixes
|
