DO NOT DEAL WITH THIS MEMBER
Well it's a well known crypter and also alot of people uses it what do you expect? if you want a fud one you need to purchase a private stub.
I also offer crypter which can help you.
https://hackforums.net/showthread.php?tid=6052599
It was awefull for me aswell
(Feb 23, 2020 06:04 AM)marazzini Wrote: - Scantime detection ratio is about 20/70 in less than 12 hours
Where did you scan it man ?
(Mar 3, 2020 02:55 AM)Fr3eD0M Wrote: Where did you scan it man ?
Private source mate, sorry
(Mar 5, 2020 10:12 AM)marazzini Wrote: Private source mate, sorry
Sounds alot like VT to me o-o
(Mar 5, 2020 10:12 AM)marazzini Wrote: Private source mate, sorry
(Mar 27, 2020 09:50 PM)SIM-2984662 Wrote: Sounds alot like VT to me o-o
That is literally the exact amount of engines used in VirusTotal. 🤦♂️
(Oct 22, 2020 09:08 PM)maldev009 Wrote: snyke cannot be trusted. snyke? more like snake. and that snakes name is john armada revesz.
(Mar 27, 2020 10:03 PM)Obistone Wrote: ![[Image: 5322NWc.png]](https://i.imgur.com/5322NWc.png)
That is literally the exact amount of engines used in VirusTotal. 🤦♂️
That was my thought process exactly, Just his initial post saying 20/70 would lead me to ban him if it was my service.
Hes part of why its not 0/70 but also most services are more focused on the important AVs to my knowledge so you'll always have VT detection's.
FOR ANYONE WHO IS NOT INFORMED USING VT IS BREAKING TERMS FOR %99 OF HF's CRYPTERS
(Mar 5, 2020 10:12 AM)marazzini Wrote: Private source mate, sorry
Theres no such thing as private source, it is called virustotal and it is public.. it is fishy that you want to hide it, if it is real then say it, i dont see any issue not telling anyone where you scan that 0/70. kleenscan, cyberscan and antiscan posted their scanner publicly..
It's not virustotal where I scanned. I know that you have to do the possible in order to sell your clay davis crypter, but please do not throw mud to people who bought the crypter.
I obviously know that I don't have to use public antiscan that shares infos about detections.
That's all. Make a real fud realtime/scantime crypter, and sell it after done for good your work.
(Mar 28, 2020 12:21 PM)marazzini Wrote: It's not virustotal where I scanned. I know that you have to do the possible in order to sell your clay davis crypter, but please do not throw mud to people who bought the crypter.
I obviously know that I don't have to use public antiscan that shares infos about detections.
That's all. Make a real fud realtime/scantime crypter, and sell it after done for good your work.
You're one to talk about throwing mud, You made a thread to trash someones product.
1. Did you ask the seller for support?
2. Did you try obfuscating the crypted file?
If you have such a big problem with whats being sold pick up some clues and learn how to code, there's a search button that can help you learn as well.
(Feb 23, 2020 06:04 AM)marazzini Wrote: Well guys, I tried to comment 2 times on Spartan thread on hackforums, but they deleted my comment.
This is my experience with Spartan Crypter Gold (there's nothing gold on it...).
1 month subscription, using it with Warzone Rat (legit and paid version obviously).
- Scantime detection ratio is about 20/70 in less than 12 hours
- binding it TOTALLY useless because it takes more than 5 minutes in order to launch the binded exe file
- runtime didn't bypassed (in my own experience) Avast, WD and malwarebytes (premium).
That's all.
did you receive any connection after crypting your stub ?
Can I use your crypter to crypt a letter
Guys buy the private stub. What´s the point buying the same crypter with other hundreds of people...
(Feb 25, 2020 03:03 PM)SIM-3132187 Wrote: 2 years ago I wrote this crypter was scam. I get censured.
Also someone remember the « GOLD UPDATE » it’s was a pure scam.
Agree, i got censured too when i shared the results of cypted files. And sure -5
Very terrible and the worst crypter I have used, not only once
|