Yes absolutely i agree with you .. i dont know why they disqualified you .. good luck fixing this : )
Some glaring MOTM problems. [JUDGE DREDD] |
(Feb 3, 2012 05:46 PM)Grin Wrote: Good job. This took quite an amount of time and effort didn't it? I actually find these mistakes pretty blatantly obvious. Good thread anyways OP. (Feb 3, 2012 05:25 PM)Scooter Wrote: I've worked hard on this thread so I'd rather not have it closed, unless there is a good reason. Who are you to decide? Staff are not obligated to post an answer everytime they close threads.
you do know that one is only human. Other than that, I think op is just butthurt he is disqualified for ever.
(Feb 3, 2012 05:25 PM)Scooter Wrote: If you think that I'm angry about being disqualified from MOTM, I am. I suggest you get over it. It's the internet for christ sake buddy.
You may want to also mention that I was in the last 4-5 Motm polls before I even won.
Each time (except for I believe one or two occasions) I was nominated by a different person, most commonly Pluto. I personally know that Dredd will hold posting the voting thread until he feels there are a good amount of candidates he feels worthy, so if anything, he does things to make it more fair. Honestly, it's nothing really to get upset over, it's an overhyped contest usually full of corruption (people using MSN and PMs to get votes for themselves or other people). I've even pulled out one month due to finding some of the people nominated unfitting and drama filled to just not have to deal with things. As far as this months voting, I was between Glassy and THL, both of which are good friends of mine here, as you used to be Scooter. Judge Dredd can read PMs of any of the contestants, and I imagine their friends as well to see if anything is going on. As far as everything goes, I doubt Glassy has asked for votes, but he will be rather persistent on messaging people when he wants something, but I've never known him to ask for votes. Scooter, you take this HF thing way too seriously. You search on Google using methods to get accounts people want and then brag about posting response in Ub3r sections for free things, sometimes replying to 20 threads at a time. If you are being helpful, it's one thing, but to brag and call yourself a rep whore isn't a very good thing. It's in good manners that you don't nominate yourself as well as ask someone to nominate you, the difference between being nominated and asking to be nominated is what says things about a member's intentions and character and that is something I don't think you understand. (Feb 3, 2012 06:20 PM)Wolves Wrote: You may want to also mention that I was in the last 4-5 Motm polls before I even won. Quoted for the truth, i dont know what to say.
Well, if he had any balls he would reply. I can almost guarantee that he sits on his computer all day and waiting for someone to mispell something or double post instead of editing etc. Not that I have anything against him because....
1- He can ban me in a second... 2- He can warn me 3- He has the same power as Omni 4- He can warn me 3 times for 1 thing (its happened to my friend False Positive on AIM) (Feb 3, 2012 07:43 PM)George Lopez Wrote: Well, if he had any balls he would reply. I can almost guarantee that he sits on his computer all day and waiting for someone to mispell something or double post instead of editing etc. Not that I have anything against him because.... Nice multi accounting.. You know so much with 1 post and join minutes ago. with a total of 7 minutes online time. (Feb 3, 2012 07:45 PM)BELLAGIO Wrote: Nice multi accounting.. You know so much with 1 post and join minutes ago. with a total of 7 minutes online time. Nope, I've been on HF (cached pages from Google) and I can show proof that im not multi-accouting. I've heard alot about it, False Positive is my friend irl (I've seen him on HF on his iPhone) (False Positive) who convinced me into joining.
Nice finding and I agree with you.
I haven't noticed the thing about the winners having something to do with the MOTM winners but I do remember when bugga was being voted after she disqualified herself JD close down the thread and awarded bugga the thread and there also was a better and more HQ person in the nomination thread but he was rejected. (Feb 3, 2012 10:24 PM)Genuine Wrote: So basically you're saying Judge Dredd is corrupted? I'm good friends with him as well and I know he wouldn't do that. No. What he's saying is he is butthurt he will never be able to get the MOTM award. (read it: He states it himself that he is mad) As well he is stating he has an HF career. Pretty Simple to understand. -Nothing personal, But OP, I suggest you invest in some reality. (Feb 3, 2012 08:28 PM)Scooter Wrote: You know well why we aren't "good" friends any more, and you can thank Judge Dredd for that. As for me taking HF too seriously... I think you may want to examine your HF career vs. mine and then see who takes HF way too seriously. He can read PM's, but im pretty sure he doesnt.
The reason you made this thread is because you are upset that you are banned from MOTM. This is just childish and won't get you anywhere. Don't take it out on me either. Yes I have been nominated a lot of times. Do you know why? Because I've done a lot more for this site than you ever will. Donating and giving free things away will never make you a good member. Making this thread instantly makes me lose any respect I held for you.
Please excuse any spelling mistakes as I am currently on my iPhone. |
|
|
