But you can also dump the code or ? and if anyone attack the server its useless or ? :/
|
C#
[Share/OpenSource] LiteCode - The ultimate anti-cracker for .Net Framework |
|
This seems to be really good. Going to check this out soon! Thumbs up
Edit: Just read the whole thread and it seems to be quite good. So this seems to be a quite good alternative for WCF (Windows Communication Foundation) which does almost the same thing! Edit once more again: I was able to bypass and change the data recieved by a little trick, but that way could be avoided by a little bit of obfuscation and extra checks! Not uncrackable but could be used as a good anti to hide from kiddo's and actually good to hide shit from leechers that will just use de4dot and make a exact replica of good applications out there! (Jul 7, 2012 08:40 AM)DragonHunter Wrote: You can't dump the code since it's being at server side and ye the down side is when ur server is down that the program stops working Can't you somehow get the dump of the code after it is transferred to the client? (Jul 7, 2012 10:17 AM)DragonHunter Wrote: No code is being transfered to the client, Only the return value from the method So all the code is being executed on the server, and the client just gets return values? What if you need to write a file, or read a file from the HD. How is that going to work if the server does not have access to the client's physical machine? (Jul 8, 2012 07:15 AM)TheUnknownProgrammer Wrote: I really like the idea, however i'm just thinking about when your computer is turned off, the software cannot be used anymore 'till you start up your computer again. Not everyone wants his computer turned on 24 hours a day.Thats why this would require a Windows VPS or Dedicated Server just like websites need. I would like to propose one suggestion if possible of hosting the server side through a c++ code that can be run on a linux server too. I remember that in WCF this implementation is possible.
It's useful, but again useless.
You only request some data from the server, however you never handle anything for the client. You still need to handle your application clientside, which you can still do. This is not helping against cracking, but against reverse-engineering/reflecting. Great job tho! As always you make impressive projects. (Jul 16, 2012 05:15 AM)BaussHacker Wrote: It's useful, but again useless. [img]http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20120213055636/uncyclopedia/images/5/52/Double-facepalm.jpg[/img] |
|
|
