[dipshit #1252]

What are the advantages and disadvantages of each? I'm not looking on how to code a crypter. I just want to know in which language would it suit what im looking for. I know in VB its easy and whatnot but i heard in c# its more flexible.

[LolZ Gym]

No advantage / disadvantages.

They both can do the same, I just prefer C# because I think it's easier to read and the syntax makes more sense.

Depends from person to person.

[‎Cloud]

No advantage / disadvantages.

They both can do the same, I just prefer C# because I think it's easier to read and the syntax makes more sense.

Depends from person to person.

Incorrect, with C# you can use unsafe code which may be useful in creating a crypter depending on what settings you want.

[BaussHacker]

Incorrect, with C# you can use unsafe code which may be useful in creating a crypter depending on what settings you want.

While VB can't work with unsafe code (Pointers etc.) then it's still possible to basically do the same things with classes already available.

[( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)]

Incorrect, with C# you can use unsafe code which may be useful in creating a crypter depending on what settings you want.

If you want unsafe code, just use C.

[‎Cloud]

If you want unsafe code, just use C.

Obviously C would be better for crypters due to no dependencies.

[Phate314]

Both get compiled to IL code in a similar fashion. Apart from the syntax, you can do the same with both languages.
(Some things are easier in VB, others in C#; but they can all be done in both languages.)

I prefere C# because of the syntax, but there's nothing wrong with VB.

[sadmoon]

^ This.

& It helps because the syntax is clean and simple to follow when your project are a lot larger.

I absolutely agree with both, C# is more pleasing to me as well.

[Volim te]

Why use a language that needs dependencies (VB6, .NET etc) for building Crypters? seems a waste of time.

[Psyche]

Why use a language that needs dependencies (VB6, .NET etc) for building Crypters? seems a waste of time.

Maybe he just wants to build a crypter for himself and doesn't plan on selling it or distributing it. Looking around the forums, the majority of people make their crypters in either c# or VB. That must mean it's pretty easy and not that time consuming to code it in those languages. I'm pretty sure it would be more difficult to write a crypter in C++ than c# or VB. Not to mention the extensive library of information (MSDN). It's all in one place and more convenient as opposed to searching the internet for information.

[‎Cloud]

Why use a language that needs dependencies (VB6, .NET etc) for building Crypters? seems a waste of time.

Considering the fact that most people have .NET installed, it isn't that big of a deal.

[Volim te]

Considering the fact that most people have .NET installed, it isn't that big of a deal.

That is not the point if you are coding malware you should not really being using .net unless it is a tool made to look legit I.E a rouge anti-virus.