[DᴇʟᴘʜɪCᴏᴅᴇᴢ]

Currently, I am only selling a total of 10 Licenses.

(Only 0 Remaining)

Click The Thread To Purchase.

[DᴇʟᴘʜɪCᴏᴅᴇᴢ]

Same crypter than the one who had 400kb stubs ? Also judging by the look of your crypter it seems like you're using XE2/XE3 you should switch to D7 for smaller executables. Anyways good luck with sales and I hope you wont get cancer this time.

If you read the thread, and read my recent threads, you would know the answer to your question. A lot of executables result in a negative stub size. Your statement regarding using D7 for smaller executables is completely inaccurate. But thanks for your "expert" opinion.

---

What about the real stub size ?

Thak you!

It is depending on the executable. If you would like to know the output size of a particular file crypted, then please send me a PM.

[DᴇʟᴘʜɪCᴏᴅᴇᴢ]

do i still get this crypter as i have a lifetime membership

Of course. Message me on skype. I am online.

[DᴇʟᴘʜɪCᴏᴅᴇᴢ]

Hmmmm it is a simple looking crypter. how long does it remain fud?

This is a pretty unreasonable question. If someone scans stubs on VT, then obviously it will not stay FUD as long. It really depends.

Simplicity is key in a good crypter. This is not a .net crypter full of copy and pasted features that can be found with a simple google search. This is a HQ Delphi Coded crypter.

[Cape]

TBH I had given alot customers to Cloak Crypter when Fanta was Reseller and when he told me that owner changed than my reffers ask from me and when I told them to contact new owner so he misbehave with all customers. So, I dont think they will trust again.

By the way you get your project back and I like it.

Good luck on sales.

[DᴇʟᴘʜɪCᴏᴅᴇᴢ]

Everyone uses the same stub?

Regards

It uses multiple rotating stubs. Between 10 people.

[JeromeMarshall]

you're using XE2/XE3 you should switch to D7 for smaller executables.

It's a preference, not an indicator of quality, just shows hes old school. The average internet user could upload a 500kb file in way less than half a second in 2012. Nitpicking over a few 100kb is pointless these days

censored, you should probably address the whole "quit/sold old cloakcrypter because of cancer" thing, or idiots will keep poking at you. It's admirable you're giving old customers their time, but people will want to know if you're still not in the best health and the same thing could happen again.

[DᴇʟᴘʜɪCᴏᴅᴇᴢ]

It's a preference, not an indicator of quality, just shows hes old school. The average internet user could upload a 500kb file in way less than half a second in 2012. Nitpicking over a few 100kb is pointless these days

censored, you should probably address the whole "quit/sold old cloakcrypter because of cancer" thing, or idiots will keep poking at you. It's admirable you're giving old customers their time, but people will want to know if you're still not in the best health and the same thing could happen again.

Ya, I'm not sure anyone cares to much about the size of the builder. Thanks Jerome for clearing that up.

Yes I probably should. Thing is, all customers received updates, constantly. They never stopped getting updates. It just gets blown out of proportion by other crypter sellers, seeing as they are intimidated by competition.

[DᴇʟᴘʜɪCᴏᴅᴇᴢ]

Nice varied GUI and Threadlayout... you seem to had a great GFX'er! GLWS & Greets, Gee.

Lol thanks for the nice words.
The graphics are nice.

[the.xAx]

Does it work with your Chrome Miner?
Is your Crypter works with 'DarkComet'?

[DᴇʟᴘʜɪCᴏᴅᴇᴢ]

Does it work with your Chrome Miner?
Is your Crypter works with 'DarkComet'?

Yes it works with both.
Works great with both.

[DᴇʟᴘʜɪCᴏᴅᴇᴢ]

Ohhhh Cloak's back! Great crypter, he has my 100% vouch!

Yes sir. Thanks for the vouch man...

[DᴇʟᴘʜɪCᴏᴅᴇᴢ]

Is this version the same as the old? with the 1mb+ stubs and the public shellcode runpe?
Just a Q.

Also would be fair if you could give your old "lifetime" customers a license instead of selling 10 new licenses and leaving the project again.

You are not very bright are you?
You can not read english can you?
You are also too stupid to understand the difference in 1mb and 300kb?

The stubs are actually negative sized. But thanks for you oh so professional response. You sound a little jealous there brother?

Oh some more answers for you. I never left the project, just stopped selling it. Updates never stopped.
All old customers have their licenses as well. They always have.

You want me to make you look stupid again just let me know. ;)

[DᴇʟᴘʜɪCᴏᴅᴇᴢ]

About your old customers... It's not mentioned on your thread so i didn't know.

300kb? the last stub you compiled and the last source you showed me over teamviewer was using the free shellcode Runpe

Code

//Shellcode array
asm
  MOV EAX, dwArrayToRun
  LEA EBX, ARunPE[0]
  CALL EBX
end;

and the default registry units for the startup etc.

Instead of talking BS on your own thread you could just answer my question and done.

I answered you question, lmfao. Like I said, you can not read. lets see if you can read this..

THE STUBS ARE NEGATIVE SIZED. MEANING THE OUTPUT IS SMALLER THAN THE INPUT. THE CRYPTED FILE IS SMALLER THAN THE ORIGINAL SERVER.

Got it now, smart guy?

[DᴇʟᴘʜɪCᴏᴅᴇᴢ]

Because you use upx? lol... you will still have a very very big output size compared to demoni's delphi crypter or other native crypters if you crypt a file.

Are you fucking retarded? Seriously?
How do I have a bigger output? IT IS SMALLER THAN THE INPUT. You keep proving how ignorant you really are, and if you check my threads, no, I do not use upx. It is not even a public method, thank you sir.

If you crypt a 400kb server, the crypted result is 300kb.
So how is that bigger than any other crypters? That mean it is -100kb stub. Notice the "-" for "negative".

Please continue to show the world your ignorance, lmfao.