(Oct 31, 2012 03:38 AM)JeromeMarshall Wrote: It's a preference, not an indicator of quality, just shows hes old school. The average internet user could upload a 500kb file in way less than half a second in 2012. Nitpicking over a few 100kb is pointless these days
censored, you should probably address the whole "quit/sold old cloakcrypter because of cancer" thing, or idiots will keep poking at you. It's admirable you're giving old customers their time, but people will want to know if you're still not in the best health and the same thing could happen again.
Ya, I'm not sure anyone cares to much about the size of the builder. Thanks Jerome for clearing that up.
Yes I probably should. Thing is, all customers received updates, constantly. They never stopped getting updates. It just gets blown out of proportion by other crypter sellers, seeing as they are intimidated by competition.
Nice varied GUI and Threadlayout... you seem to had a great GFX'er! GLWS & Greets, Gee.
(Oct 31, 2012 06:15 AM)Gee4rce Wrote: Nice varied GUI and Threadlayout... you seem to had a great GFX'er! GLWS & Greets, Gee.
Lol thanks for the nice words.
The graphics are nice.
Does it work with your Chrome Miner?
Is your Crypter works with 'DarkComet'?
(Oct 31, 2012 07:40 AM)the.xAx Wrote: Does it work with your Chrome Miner?
Is your Crypter works with 'DarkComet'?
Yes it works with both.
Works great with both.
Ohhhh Cloak's back! Great crypter, he has my 100% vouch!
(Oct 31, 2012 10:10 AM)Numeric Wrote: Ohhhh Cloak's back! Great crypter, he has my 100% vouch!
Yes sir. Thanks for the vouch man...
Is this version the same as the old? with the 1mb+ stubs and the public shellcode runpe?
Just a Q.
Also would be fair if you could give your old "lifetime" customers a license instead of selling 10 new licenses and leaving the project again.
(Oct 31, 2012 11:47 AM)SBMK Wrote: Is this version the same as the old? with the 1mb+ stubs and the public shellcode runpe?
Just a Q.
Also would be fair if you could give your old "lifetime" customers a license instead of selling 10 new licenses and leaving the project again.
You are not very bright are you?
You can not read english can you?
You are also too stupid to understand the difference in 1mb and 300kb?
The stubs are actually negative sized. But thanks for you oh so professional response. You sound a little jealous there brother?
Oh some more answers for you. I never left the project, just stopped selling it. Updates never stopped.
All old customers have their licenses as well. They always have.
You want me to make you look stupid again just let me know. ;)
(Oct 31, 2012 11:50 AM)DᴇʟᴘʜɪCᴏᴅᴇᴢ Wrote: You are not very bright are you?
You can not read english can you?
You are also too stupid to understand the difference in 1mb and 300kb?
The stubs are actually negative sized. But thanks for you oh so professional response. You sound a little jealous there brother?
Oh some more answers for you. I never left the project, just stopped selling it. Updates never stopped.
All old customers have their licenses as well. They always have.
You want me to make you look stupid again just let me know. ;)
About your old customers... It's not mentioned on your thread so i didn't know.
300kb? the last stub you compiled and the last source you showed me over teamviewer was using the free shellcode Runpe
Code //Shellcode array
asm
MOV EAX, dwArrayToRun
LEA EBX, ARunPE[0]
CALL EBX
end;
and the default registry units for the startup etc.
Instead of talking BS on your own thread you could just answer my question and done.
(Oct 31, 2012 11:59 AM)SBMK Wrote: About your old customers... It's not mentioned on your thread so i didn't know.
300kb? the last stub you compiled and the last source you showed me over teamviewer was using the free shellcode Runpe
Code //Shellcode array
asm
MOV EAX, dwArrayToRun
LEA EBX, ARunPE[0]
CALL EBX
end;
and the default registry units for the startup etc.
Instead of talking BS on your own thread you could just answer my question and done.
I answered you question, lmfao. Like I said, you can not read. lets see if you can read this..
THE STUBS ARE NEGATIVE SIZED. MEANING THE OUTPUT IS SMALLER THAN THE INPUT. THE CRYPTED FILE IS SMALLER THAN THE ORIGINAL SERVER.
Got it now, smart guy?
(Oct 31, 2012 12:05 PM)DᴇʟᴘʜɪCᴏᴅᴇᴢ Wrote: I answered you question, lmfao. Like I said, you can not read. lets see if you can read this..
THE STUBS ARE NEGATIVE SIZED. MEANING THE OUTPUT IS SMALLER THAN THE INPUT. THE CRYPTED FILE IS SMALLER THAN THE ORIGINAL SERVER.
Got it now, smart guy?
Because you use upx? lol... you will still have a very very big output size compared to demoni's delphi crypter or other native crypters if you crypt a file.
(Oct 31, 2012 12:11 PM)SBMK Wrote: Because you use upx? lol... you will still have a very very big output size compared to demoni's delphi crypter or other native crypters if you crypt a file.
Are you fucking retarded? Seriously?
How do I have a bigger output? IT IS SMALLER THAN THE INPUT. You keep proving how ignorant you really are, and if you check my threads, no, I do not use upx. It is not even a public method, thank you sir.
If you crypt a 400kb server, the crypted result is 300kb.
So how is that bigger than any other crypters? That mean it is -100kb stub. Notice the "-" for "negative".
Please continue to show the world your ignorance, lmfao.
Oct 31, 2012 12:55 PM
(This post was last modified: Oct 31, 2012 12:57 PM by SBMK.)
(Oct 31, 2012 12:14 PM)DᴇʟᴘʜɪCᴏᴅᴇᴢ Wrote: Are you fucking retarded? Seriously?
How do I have a bigger output? IT IS SMALLER THAN THE INPUT. You keep proving how ignorant you really are, and if you check my threads, no, I do not use upx. It is not even a public method, thank you sir.
If you crypt a 400kb server, the crypted result is 300kb.
So how is that bigger than any other crypters? That mean it is -100kb stub. Notice the "-" for "negative".
Please continue to show the world your ignorance, lmfao.
I just lolled at your "Negative" i think you just learned how to use a compressor... And your not the only one who can use them (other crypters can use them also).
Loll "not a public method" ok just provide me a crypter file and let me see what your using haha, 400kb server, +- 200kb stub = 600kb, compress = +- 300kb ,
The crypters i was talking about.
400kb server , 20kb stub = 420kb , compress = +- 200 kb.
Still a big difference. If you have the balls just send me a crypter file over pm and lets see what kind of things i can get out of it:)
Enough discussed here, i don't think you want to ruin your sales thread.
(Oct 31, 2012 12:55 PM)SBMK Wrote: Loll "not a public method" ok just provide me a crypter file and let me see what your using haha, 400kb server, +- 200kb stub = 600kb, compress = +- 300kb ,
The crypters i was talking about.
400kb server , 20kb stub = 420kb , compress = +- 200 kb.
Still a big difference. If you have the balls just send me a crypter file over pm and lets see what kind of things i can get out of it:)
Enough discussed here, i don't think you want to ruin your sales thread.
Ruin? I could report everyone of your posts and have them removed, and yet I am not for the simple fact that it is funny how stupid you really are.
Ya, let me send you a crypted file so that you can scan on VT. Not everyone here is as dumb as you. :)
I do appreciate all the b*mps you are providing for my thread though. Thanks.
|
