Home Upgrade Search Memberlist Extras Hacker Tools Award Goals Help Wiki Contact

Exploit Packs

You also need a loader that is very small in size ~40 KB max. ~40 KB max crypted i mean. So shit like LoadHTTP will fuck your execution rate. Anything over 100 KB is not worth using on exploit kit.
A lot of loaders offer the option for memory malware now (good ones, not shit like rig). You can get a good dll downloader that's small and mobile.
Most Exploit Kits do not show the real LOADED rate. The real loaded rate of exploited machines depends on your crypter. FUD.PE has a total of %10 percent rate when used an exploit kit. For example lets say you have 5k loaded bots (means exploited), only 10 percent of those bots will be loaded on your net. Most decent crypts have a 40 % rate. Do the math.
(Feb 8, 2015 10:12 AM)Raoul Duke Wrote:  Ok so you don't know the difference between a loader and an exploit kit...

I woke up retard, I know far more than you.
(Feb 8, 2015 10:49 AM)immortalwon Wrote:  Most Exploit Kits do not show the real LOADED rate. The real loaded rate of exploited machines depends on your crypter. FUD.PE has a total of %10 percent rate when used an exploit kit. For example lets say you have 5k loaded bots (means exploited), only 10 percent of those bots will be loaded on your net. Most decent crypts have a 40 % rate. Do the math.

A: You use bullshit malware thats hips detected
B: You use bullshit crypter thats hips detected

Which is it? Or maybe its both?

40% exec rate is fucking pathetic.


(Feb 8, 2015 10:35 AM)Blatngu® Wrote:  Erhm , sorry to contradict you , but loadhttp has a stub of 32kb 🤝 , of course when it will be crypted his stub size will grow

So? 32 KB + shitty HF crypter = > 100 KB.

Crypt LoadHTTP with an AutoIT crypter LMFAO!
(Feb 8, 2015 12:41 PM)SIM-595622 Wrote:  Thats stupid. Either your crypt work or it doesnt.
The reason youre getting low rate to exe is shit traffic.

Then theres .net, file size and what not but the main reason is shit traffic.

How would you define "shit traffic"? How does it contrast to "good" traffic?
We'll it all depends on:

Traffic (What country they are from.)
Exploit pack (Is it detected by some AVs?)
Exploit pack shellcode, rotation etc etc
Your bot size, is your bot detected by some AVs?

You'll need to do alot of testings to find out the execution/infection rate.
(Feb 8, 2015 01:58 PM)Rhodos Wrote:  Sorry for gettin into this thread, so 40% is pathetic, what is a decent %? And how can u achieve it? I mean, u were talking generally, good traffic and good crypter? Like what?

40% exploit rate is omfg fucking amazing. So far i've seen only Rig do it on BR traffic.

40% malware execution rate is pathetic.
(Feb 8, 2015 02:10 PM)iamskid Wrote:  40% exploit rate is omfg fucking amazing. So far i've seen only Rig do it on BR traffic.

40% malware execution rate is pathetic.

Why is BR traffic especially shit? Or VN? Or MX?

Does no-one in these countries ever update their browsers?
If you are looking for a exploit kit contact me =D @bull add me on jabbber. Buying 100k traff


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread / Author Replies Views Last Post
by SecureBitcoinSep 17, 2015 06:59 PM 5 344 Sep 17, 2015 06:59 PM
Last Post: occupi
by TricornJun 4, 2015 03:36 PM 10 461 Jun 4, 2015 03:36 PM
Last Post: Snowlion_
by bobo5555Jan 17, 2014 05:44 PM 4 189 Jan 17, 2014 05:44 PM
Last Post: xyfir