[FastCrypt]

Sales thread: https://hackforums.net/showthread.php?tid=4616066

Ok here is my review.
I was instructed not to leave any negative feedback or i would lose my license as soon as i bought this crypter.
I thought to myself that there must be a reason why he writes this as his first statement to me after i purchased it.
However I'm still going to give my honest opinion on this. I bought this, it took about two days before i actually got the program but okay i can live with that.





First, i thought he wrote in his thread that it was coded in C++ ?


It's not?


Stub size is about 408kb, stuffed with junk, clearly the one who wrote this does not know how to code a proper crypter.
After receiving it i was curious because he advertises that it "bypasses ALL" antivirus runtime so i put it to the test in my boxed environment.

Testing performed with ESET


Testing performed with Norton


Testing performed with Kaspersky




Testing performed with Bitdefender


A little cute loop that counts nothing, after this a few more useless loops followed along with sleep etc... i bet this is effective against runtime antivirus(ironic).....


EDIT - A few hours after i wrote this thread, the files became heavily detected obviously because the lack of runtime, even though he made it "undetected" ~14 hours ago.


14 hours later....


I was planning on doing further analysis in ollydbg, but as it didnt succeed on even one of my tests i assume this was not even necessary.
But what I can say so far, poorly coded crypter with little to none protection against both AV and reversers.

When a crypter like this is not runtime against any of the major AV's they will all distribute the samples caught, and share them between eachother.
No wonder this crypter is fud for just a few hours.

You can gangrep me all you want, i dont care. I just feel that people should know this before they buy.
False advertising is not the way to go as a scantime only crypter can be coded FUD in C++ in less than a day.

[FastCrypt]

These are either error messages because you run the file in a Virtual Machine, he would not sell a crypter like that lol.

No this is memory detection, i have written my own crypter in C++ and its the same problem. Runtime.
This has nothing to do with AntiVM, and for that case anti vm was neither turned on.

[FastCrypt]

then explain me why the error message does not follow the standard?

It hits ResumeThread, then AV message pops up in right corner then disables the execution.
If i encrypt a messagebox or putty.exe for that instance the execution will be successfull because its not detected by their memory scanner. But as soon as you encrypt malware with it, you will get what i just showed you.

If you want me to show you my own self written crypter in a demonstration against the same issue, i will do it with pleasure, contact me in PM.

[kneegurs]

good nice to see some people not bsing for once.

['An0ny]

You've done some excellent research here my friend, thanks for sharing the truth about the Crypter.

[FastCrypt]

Added a bit more to the thread.

[BLiNDzZ]

lol so glad someone finally wrote a review. i knew this months ago but i was too lazy to say my claims and provide proof good post glad this idiot is getting exposed.

[FastCrypt]

Funny how he got my review link removed from his sales thread.
I thought people were allowed to give their opinion about an item when they've purchased it? Seems not

[FastCrypt]

I was so confused when i was looking at this a few days ago and saw that LOL.

nice ass review op, you going to keep reviewing some more crypters? or thinking about trying out RAT's and other things?

Thanks, well usually i don't review stuff like this, but i found this crypter extremely poor, and that just made me want to document everything.

I'm currently writing my own crypter in C++ which is more or less done, so im quite busy with that.
Maybe you'll see more reviews in the future if i find them funny enough to write about :)

[BLiNDzZ]

hey man it doesnt matter if you showed proof of a scam. omni doesnt give a fuck . if they pay for a sticky he would put child porn up if they paid the right price.

[FastCrypt]

hey man it doesnt matter if you showed proof of a scam. omni doesnt give a fuck . if they pay for a sticky he would put child porn up if they paid the right price.

Well thats Indeed sad news

[Gangster Disciple]

Thanks alot for this review.
Enjoyed the .gifs