Microsoft Security Essentials is designed to disable Windows Defender in order to manage the PC’s real-time protection, including anti-virus, rootkits, Trojans and spyware.
How does Microsoft Security Essentials measure up to the big expensive AV software? |
(Sep 18, 2010 07:15 PM)InuyashaITB Wrote: It is horrible. but of course its better than NOTHING at all... I agree with you on that, Avast is better than both of them.
Hi madsam,
Actually, MSE is now considered to be one of the most popular and highly recommended protection agents out. It's definitely up there with Kaspersky, Avira, Avast, and NOD32. Hack Forums has never been best friends with MSE, but you'll find it's absolutely worshiped in other communities (such as SevenForums). Thanks, Malware Boss
The only reason Mcafee is alive today is because of its business products that many companys use even today. Symantec and McAfee are world preferences for corporate firms. Symantec, on the other hand, has improved incredibly and I can 100% rely on Norton. But I will never let Mcafee in my pc.
So far, I haven't heard any negative stuff about it, which I guess is good. Most of what I've seen seems to indicate that Microsoft may have gotten it right this time. I have it turned off at the moment as I am using some thing else. As far as the firewall goes, I only use the Windows firewall along with the built in router firewall.
I always used the free AVG versions since I could remember, but since the day MSE came out, I've been stuck on it. I love it! It's great, very very low false positives, pretty much gets everything I need it to get. I've been wondering about using Avira or Avast, tho MSE is probably one of the best out there imho, for a free AV.
|
|
|
