[The Hack Master]

So with the new Bit Defender 2011, It comes with Active Virus Control. Which is basically a botkiller, it has its own database of virus, trojans and malware signatures. No matter if the file is crypted 100% Run/Scantime, it will not by pass the AVC. because it works like a botkiller, it checks online for the database of signatures. and it will block the crypted file from running or executing. So every crypter owners no matter how hard you try, ur crypter wont be able to by pass this, ive had bit defender 2011 since 2months and i have blackshades and dakr eye crypter and many other paid crypters, none of them works. If you think im lying. here read this

http://download.bitdefender.com/resource...rol_wp.pdf

It explains how it works, so even a crypted file will be terminated, because of the signature of the original server, for example Cybergate, Dark Comet or even Blackshades, they have signature of all the Known RATS. so it will terminate it even if its crypted. so good luck people. i my self have wasted over 200$ figuring this out, didnt work lol. i have paid 2011 bit defender av.

[Tha Sneak]

AVC is heuristics. All anti-viruses have heuristics, some better than others. I will say Bitdefender isn't the best. I highly doubt your hypothesis is correct. From reading your paragraph it basically tells me you don't understand how anti-viruses work very well.

[The Hack Master]

AVC is heuristics. All anti-viruses have heuristics, some better than others. I will say Bitdefender isn't the best. I highly doubt your hypothesis is correct. From reading your paragraph it basically tells me you don't understand how anti-viruses work very well.

lol if u read the pdf link directly from their website u wud know, and im not talkin abt bit defender av it self, im talkin about one of the component that comes with it, thats AVC. just like kaspery comes with proactive shit.

[-mothered-]

Now If any of this Is accurately documented, I'd be truly Impressed. So what happens If the crypted file Is not defined In the signature database?

In due course, I'll give a few of my crypted servers a test against It.

[The Hack Master]

Now If any of this Is accurately documented, I'd be truly Impressed. So what happens If the crypted file Is not defined In the signature database?

In due course, I'll give a few of my crypted servers a test against It.

the crypted file has nothing to do with this, the signatures are from the Client, When u build a server for example darkcomet server, all the servers have a same signature of the dark comet client, Because client is what makes the Server. so Bit Defender has database of known viruses. so since dark comet blackshades cybergate and etc are populor, ofc the signatre of them are stored into the database.

[Golliath808]

So the only chance is to built your own RAt or virus(a polimorphic one) -HEHE then the AVC will not have that new signature.

[The Hack Master]

So the only chance is to built your own RAt or virus(a polimorphic one) -HEHE then the AVC will not have that new signature.

u got it lol. or simply make it so that each time a server is build thur the client, it generates a new signature, or the client it selfs generates a new signature eachtime u open the client.

[bacterialbag]

Hmmm... I've tried loads of crypters, and i can't seem to get Blackshades passt heuristic AV's.

Any solutions yet? Will there ever be solutions? Or will future hacking only be possible with advanced coding knowledge?