(May 12, 2012 04:23 PM)Snoepie1012 Wrote: How is this option unnecessary? Lets say about 60% of the people are using automaticly logins and 40% arent. You will lose a couple of passwords and you will have to be lucky he uses the same password for everything so you can still hack him. (Mostly Facebook because people check it alot so they use cookies to login for them)
Let me explain It in details...
What does a keylogger do?
Grab the used keys, bring them and send them to the hacker as
a log. Some keyloggers (just like Unknown Logger Public) even have got
features for logging screen, and/or have stealers, just like for the different
web browsers, but I'd mention the serial key stealer in this category aswell.
Well, in our case these are all happy and good, but there's one, what is an
important error of the logger. This keylogger doesn't log keyhits. It should. But It doesn't. It has got a bug, what mess up this part so logs about keyhits even don't arrive. (other functions work)
So I ask you...if it doesn't send keylogs anyway, why would anybody use an option what is supposed to steal keylogs? Unlogical.
I hope you see the point. Your statement isn't false, but not needed.
When they will repair the keylogger part, Your statement will be true,
and useful. But until that, I think the point still at me.
And this logger is still good anyway, because screenlogger and
the stealers still work well.