[d0x3r]

HOw much is size of stub ? And in wich leanguage is coded?

[Razοr]

250-300kb will be added. It's AutoIT3 (wich is C)

[Gropaf]

Vouch for the crypter i bought it an its work like a charm !

[jordannike2012]

Can anybody tell me a good setup setting for BS because i'm kinda having problems

[Sashakse]

Vouch for Ebola, you did an amazing work here!
GLWS!

[404™]

Hi guy I have some question can i bind file ? Have this Crypter starup?..

[Hestia.]

Buying it right now, Thanks for selling, Making it go smooth.

Edit: Went Smooth, And easy. Thank you.

[Inspector Gadget]

Another massive vouch for this, ive seen so many refuds to make sure its 100% fud all day everyday and so many great updated!

This crypter is the best cheap crypter on hackforums.

[Razοr]

Hi guy I have some question can i bind file ? Have this Crypter starup?..

Startup: Yes
Binder: No, this will be in advanced version.

---

Scan result of the new Update:

File Info

Report date: 2012-06-08.
Scan Occured: [img]http://metascan.org/result_time.php?t=i&w=Mzk4Njgx[/img]
Link to scan: http://metascan.org/result.php?scan=Mzk4Njgx
File name: nofuckingcals.exe
File size: 1187916 bytes
MD5 Hash: 80704ac423cd395b8337046d083b2887
SHA1 Hash: 2014081f8b8edf2522a35499c03623971f1d52d9
Detection rate: 0 out of 37
Status: CLEAN

Detections

AVG - Clean.
Acavir - Clean.
Avast 5 -Clean.
Avast -Clean.
Avira -Clean.
BitDefender -Clean.
VirusBuster Internet Security -Clean.
Clam Antivirus -Clean.
COMODO Internet Security -Clean.
DrWeb -Clean.
eTrust-Vet -Clean.
F-PROT Antivirus -Clean.
F-Secure Internet Security -Clean.
G Data -Clean.
IKARUS Security-Clean.
Kaspersky Antivirus -Clean.
McAfee -Clean.
MS Security Essentials -Clean.
ESET NOD32 -Clean.
Norman -Clean.
Norton -Clean.
Panda Security -Clean.
A-Squared Security -Clean.
Quick Heal Antivirus -Clean.
Rising Antivirus -Clean.
Solo Antivirus -Clean.
Sophos -Clean.
Trend Micro Internet Security -Clean.
VBA32 Antivirus -Clean.
Vexira Antivirus -Clean.
Webroot Internet Security -Clean.
Zoner AntiVirus -Clean.
Ad-Aware -Clean.
AhnLab V3 Internet Security -Clean.
Bullguard -Clean.
Imunitet -Clean.
Vipre -Clean.

Scan report generated by
MetaScan.org

[ThinkThinkorThink]

Everyone from CrypteX Lite is going to come here. It pretty much died a few weeks ago and it'll never be what it used to be when it first came out.

``What we need to decide as customers would be a cap for the amount of customers you'll be having in the future. This limit would, of course, increase the chance of people buying your product since it'll be kind-of a private crypter.``

Most of us know that CrypteX Lite hasn't been successful because they're security is breached and the coder is having some personal life things to deal with. He has about 850 customers that aren't happy, am I right? Let's look into the past of CrypteX for a second here. It was great, it was always FUD, the support was easy and well done through Skype usually. Teamviewer was also used for helping remotively. It was pretty much at this stage of Razor Crypter, and everything was perfect. But it looks like it'll be exxactly like CrypteX if we don't put a certain limit to the amount of customers.

I hope some of you will actually understand where I'm coming from, and bear in mind that if we don't take action, the crypting market will have gone unreliable. Please do not take this as a threat as I'm only sharing this and see if I'm not the only one thinking that.

Thanks for reading.

TL;DR? : We should put a cap to the amount of customers you will be having.

[Ebolа]

Everyone from CrypteX Lite is going to come here. It pretty much died a few weeks ago and it'll never be what it used to be when it first came out.

``What we need to decide as customers would be a cap for the amount of customers you'll be having in the future. This limit would, of course, increase the chance of people buying your product since it'll be kind-of a private crypter.``

Most of us know that CrypteX Lite hasn't been successful because they're security is breached and the coder is having some personal life things to deal with. He has about 850 customers that aren't happy, am I right? Let's look into the past of CrypteX for a second here. It was great, it was always FUD, the support was easy and well done through Skype usually. Teamviewer was also used for helping remotively. It was pretty much at this stage of Razor Crypter, and everything was perfect. But it looks like it'll be exxactly like CrypteX if we don't put a certain limit to the amount of customers.

I hope some of you will actually understand where I'm coming from, and bear in mind that if we don't take action, the crypting market will have gone unreliable. Please do not take this as a threat as I'm only sharing this and see if I'm not the only one thinking that.

Thanks for reading.

TL;DR? : We should put a cap to the amount of customers you will be having.

I appreciate your opinion, but this is not like crypteX. This will still be FUD if we had 10000 customers, because it has a unique way of crypting it. Especially with a new method we just introduced, it is using a completely unique method. So even though I do appreciate it, you are incorrect on this. (:

[Razοr]

Everyone from CrypteX Lite is going to come here. It pretty much died a few weeks ago and it'll never be what it used to be when it first came out.

``What we need to decide as customers would be a cap for the amount of customers you'll be having in the future. This limit would, of course, increase the chance of people buying your product since it'll be kind-of a private crypter.``

Most of us know that CrypteX Lite hasn't been successful because they're security is breached and the coder is having some personal life things to deal with. He has about 850 customers that aren't happy, am I right? Let's look into the past of CrypteX for a second here. It was great, it was always FUD, the support was easy and well done through Skype usually. Teamviewer was also used for helping remotively. It was pretty much at this stage of Razor Crypter, and everything was perfect. But it looks like it'll be exxactly like CrypteX if we don't put a certain limit to the amount of customers.

I hope some of you will actually understand where I'm coming from, and bear in mind that if we don't take action, the crypting market will have gone unreliable. Please do not take this as a threat as I'm only sharing this and see if I'm not the only one thinking that.

Thanks for reading.

TL;DR? : We should put a cap to the amount of customers you will be having.

Hi, don't worry about that. RazorCrypt is codet in a complete new way that makes me able to refud it within about 1 hour. I would be able to refud it even if we would have 1k users. i actualy change the crypter more then 1x per day. We will stay FUD and we have very low chance to get detected. We actually use a new way to crypt and bypass antiviruses. I will not let anyone know what this new method is, but trust me. 99% of the AVs don't even scan for that. And those who do get bypassed too.

And please never do compare us with cryptex. it is completly different. I used it too and actually don't liked it. Kaspersky (buyed version) detected the running files the hole time!

I spend many hours each day to make our product better and i will keep doing this.

So guys, don't worry RazorCrypt will ever be the same: Awesome!

Regards, TeamRazor

Also, sorry, my english is not to good.

[ThinkThinkorThink]

I appreciate your opinion, but this is not like crypteX. This will still be FUD if we had 10000 customers, because it has a unique way of crypting it. Especially with a new method we just introduced, it is using a completely unique method. So even though I do appreciate it, you are incorrect on this. (:

Thanks for precising that mate. I'm pretty sure everyone else and I are glad to hear that you know what you're doing! Keep up the good work and let me know if you need an extra support member, I'm quite experienced into crypters/RATs.

---

Hi, don't worry about that. RazorCrypt is codet in a complete new way that makes me able to refud it within about 1 hour. I would be able to refud it even if we would have 1k users. i actualy change the crypter more then 1x per day. We will stay FUD and we have very low chance to get detected. We actually use a new way to crypt and bypass antiviruses. I will not let anyone know what this new method is, but trust me. 99% of the AVs don't even scan for that. And those who do get bypassed too.

And please never do compare us with cryptex. it is completly different. I used it too and actually don't liked it. Kaspersky (buyed version) detected the running files the hole time!

I spend many hours each day to make our product better and i will keep doing this.

So guys, don't worry RazorCrypt will ever be the same: Awesome!

Regards, TeamRazor

Also, sorry, my english is not to good.

You're english is very understandable :) Thanks man, I will be one of your Advanced Version of Razor Crypter very soon! And sorry if I did compare with CrypteX, it was more of a personal view since I used that one a lot before. Also, thank you for the fast responses.

[lolwutgm]

Vouch for crypter. Very easy to use, and the results are always FUD. Great coder and seller.

You can't go wrong with this price especially for such a good product.

[Razοr]

Thank you for your feedback. We do our best to make our product better every day.

Best Regards

---

BTW: actual scanresult:

File Info

Report date: 2012-06-09.
Scan Occured: [img]http://metascan.org/result_time.php?t=i&w=Mzk4ODM4[/img]
Link to scan: http://metascan.org/result.php?scan=Mzk4ODM4
File name: slideshowofme.exe
File size: 1187984 bytes
MD5 Hash: 994fa1fb7b62297b222819419eb37c95
SHA1 Hash: d1de68bbc171181203fb467830aa9fef81494fca
Detection rate: 0 out of 37
Status: CLEAN

Detections

AVG - Clean.
Acavir - Clean.
Avast 5 -Clean.
Avast -Clean.
Avira -Clean.
BitDefender -Clean.
VirusBuster Internet Security -Clean.
Clam Antivirus -Clean.
COMODO Internet Security -Clean.
DrWeb -Clean.
eTrust-Vet -Clean.
F-PROT Antivirus -Clean.
F-Secure Internet Security -Clean.
G Data -Clean.
IKARUS Security-Clean.
Kaspersky Antivirus -Clean.
McAfee -Clean.
MS Security Essentials -Clean.
ESET NOD32 -Clean.
Norman -Clean.
Norton -Clean.
Panda Security -Clean.
A-Squared Security -Clean.
Quick Heal Antivirus -Clean.
Rising Antivirus -Clean.
Solo Antivirus -Clean.
Sophos -Clean.
Trend Micro Internet Security -Clean.
VBA32 Antivirus -Clean.
Vexira Antivirus -Clean.
Webroot Internet Security -Clean.
Zoner AntiVirus -Clean.
Ad-Aware -Clean.
AhnLab V3 Internet Security -Clean.
Bullguard -Clean.
Imunitet -Clean.
Vipre -Clean.

Scan report generated by
MetaScan.org