Home Upgrade Search Memberlist Extras Hacker Tools Award Goals Help Wiki Contact

What would you guys like to see in a crypter?

(Sep 6, 2012 07:53 PM)Advanced™ Wrote:  I'll have pre-made stubs made. So that once its detected it'll be FUD quickly.


Here's a recent scan.
Spoiler (Click to View)

What about generic detections on your stub?
(Sep 7, 2012 08:54 PM)Prince of Persia Wrote:  What about generic detections on your stub?

That really depends on the icon & assembly used. So far, I've been getting FUD results.
I Know how to make a file pumper, Icon changer and assembly changer. You should add those :)
(Sep 7, 2012 09:08 PM)logging*machine Wrote:  I Know how to make a file pumper, Icon changer and assembly changer. You should add those :)

There is a built in icon changer and assembly changer.
Same I just got this too I hope this will come with instruction on how to set up the Rats ? 🤝
  • File Binder ( That Works?)

  • Extension Spoofer (Any extension, .mp3, .gif etc.)

  • Automatic EOF detection & support

  • Live 24/7 Support



I hope to get help on your old Crypter because I still haven't got a reply yet to know if there is another file binder I can use with your current Crypter or just update my old one to the new one when it comes out ?

I hope to see this working soon 👍
(Sep 8, 2012 06:59 AM)Bruce80 Wrote:  Same I just got this too I hope this will come with instruction on how to set up the Rats ? 🤝
  • File Binder ( That Works?)

  • Extension Spoofer (Any extension, .mp3, .gif etc.)

  • Automatic EOF detection & support

  • Live 24/7 Support



I hope to get help on your old Crypter because I still haven't got a reply yet to know if there is another file binder I can use with your current Crypter or just update my old one to the new one when it comes out ?

I hope to see this working soon 👍
There will be two separate projects. Although OSX customers will receive a special discount for this crypter.
What do you mean two seperate projects..
One project for "X" crypter.
The second project for "Y" crypter.

....
Pumper, AV Killer, Compatible with DC. Fully FUD.
Don't bother thinking on what features you want to add, just make sure its FUD with good support and I'm sure it will be successful.
Make it a simple crypter. No fancy shit, just concentrate on keeping it FUD and compatible.

Ensure it's in a no dependencies language like C++ or ASM, maybe VB6.

A WORKING USG would be nice too.

This is just what I'd look for. I can't speak for the whole of HF.

(Sep 8, 2012 01:59 PM)Tubz Wrote:  Don't bother thinking on what features you want to add, just make sure its FUD with good support and I'm sure it will be successful.

Said it all.
I just would it to work as I still haven't seen any proof mines working as his old project clams the binder works it doesn't I would just like a program to work what I paid for is that to hard to ask for and if you are willing to upgrade my crypter to the new ones and to be a tester that would be great.

Thank you .
Vouch for Advanced. I've seen his new crypter and it's amazing.
Do you have any idea if till will be Paradox compaitable?
(Sep 8, 2012 08:42 PM)KyleWTF Wrote:  Do you have any idea if till will be Paradox compaitable?

It will most likely be. Paradox is coded in .net right?