[Mr. Anderson]

Obama supporters are either.
1.) Black or Hispanic.
2.) Uneducated.
3.) Under the age of eighteen.

No, this is not the case. This is called making a poisoning the well, and I suggest you read up on it.

Personal Attack (Argumentum Ad Hominem, literally, "argument toward the man." Also called "Poisoning the Well"): Attacking or praising the people who make an argument, rather than discussing the argument itself. This practice is fallacious because the personal character of an individual is logically irrelevant to the truth or falseness of the argument itself. The statement "2+2=4" is true regardless if is stated by criminals, congressmen, or pastors. There are two subcategories:

(1) Abusive: To argue that proposals, assertions, or arguments must be false or dangerous because they originate with atheists, Christians, Communists, capitalists, the John Birch Society, Catholics, anti-Catholics, racists, anti-racists, feminists, misogynists (or any other group) is fallacious. This persuasion comes from irrational psychological transference rather than from an appeal to evidence or logic concerning the issue at hand. This is similar to the genetic fallacy, and only an anti-intellectual would argue otherwise.

(2) Circumstantial: To argue that an opponent should accept or reject an argument because of circumstances in his or her life. If one's adversary is a clergyman, suggesting that he should accept a particular argument because not to do so would be incompatible with the scriptures is such a fallacy. To argue that, because the reader is a Republican or Democrat, she must vote for a specific measure is likewise a circumstantial fallacy. The opponent's special circumstances have no control over the truth or untruth of a specific contention. The speaker or writer must find additional evidence beyond that to make a strong case. This is also similar to the genetic fallacy in some ways. If you are a college student who wants to learn rational thought, you simply must avoid circumstantial fallacies

He needs to go and anyone whom doesn't agree is a complete idiot.

This is also known as ad hominem, I suggest you read up on it.

Genetic Fallacy: The genetic fallacy is the claim that an idea, product, or person must be untrustworthy because of its racial, geographic, or ethnic origin. "That car can't possibly be any good! It was made in Japan!" Or, "Why should I listen to her argument? She comes from California, and we all know those people are flakes." Or, "Ha! I'm not reading that book. It was published in Tennessee, and we know all Tennessee folk are hillbillies and rednecks!" This type of fallacy is closely related to the fallacy of argumentum ad hominem or personal attack, appearing immediately below.

Unfortunately, you just proved that you lack the basic knowledge to support your own claims.

[Douchebag # 145]

No, this is not the case. This is called making a poisoning the well, and I suggest you read up on it.

This is also known as ad hominem, I suggest you read up on it.

Unfortunately, you just proved that you lack the basic knowledge to support your own claims.

Ignore Demoralize.
He's in support of mass killings.

[tdogg96]

very nice. these are a good way to kill 10 minutes

[Free Stuff]

@THL, " Nice, Nice "

The news is cool. I used to run the news on another forum, and I know it is difficult to get a good edition made each week.
So, congrats to you all on making a nice edition ;)

[Harry Dresden]

"will be primarily vacated by members of the HackForums community"

Is it just me or is the use of vacated standing out to anyone?

vacated past participle, past tense of va·cate (Verb)
Verb:

Leave (a place that one previously occupied): "rooms must be vacated by noon".
Give up (a position or employment).

[A-Void]

Great edition as usual! Keep up the good work.

[Prince™]

Nice edition. I'm glad that my ISP didn't do shits this week and I was able to do the Tech news. 🙂

[Terenz]

Well done, hope to see many like this

[Temper ‌]

Reading is not your strongest asset.

I meant like forum-wise.
I probably should have worded it better.

[J. McCarthy]

Obama supporters are either.
1.) Black or Hispanic.
2.) Uneducated.
3.) Under the age of eighteen.

Granted Romney isn't the best choice out there but far better than Obama. Obama hasn't done jack shit throughout his term. ObamaCare is absolutely a terrible idea, his promise to the pull troops out of Afghanistan and Iraq flunked, it took almost his entire term to get us out of Iraq and we're still in Afghanistan. He hasn't done jack shit for the economy, he's only made it worse. Under Obama the average household debt has increased by 50%. He needs to go and anyone whom doesn't agree is a complete idiot.

Bugga banned me for two days saying I need to cool off....
I guess I can't express opinion in the news.

I will make my own thread with 100+ reasons Obama is HORRIBLE and hope for it to be in the news for the first Romney+ thread :)

If this breaks ANY rules please let me know, lol.

[Masturbate]

Oh really nice news, thanks for spreading em!

[Grillianz]

Lol interesting liberal bias in the HF news
I don't mind though

[Strokes‌]

Lol interesting liberal bias in the HF news
I don't mind though

Those are the threads that got popular quickly.
If you wanna change it go make your own thread become popular.

[Mr. Anderson]

Those are the threads that got popular quickly.
If you wanna change it go make your own thread become popular.

Exactly, I do not discriminate, but there have not been any conservative threads that are popular in SRPP.

[J. McCarthy]

Exactly, I do not discriminate, but there have not been any conservative threads that are popular in SRPP.

Thats so wrong, ive seen active threads.
yet you put your obama is the savior who only adds more pain threads upp