['Snorlax]

Hey guys!

I have a very nice way of logging someone's IP or redirecting them using Google. Instead of sending a link, where it's like saying "hey, I-want-your-IP.com". I'm using Google Documents to generate my access key, which is used to authenticate the link. Without it, it will not redirect. Let's begin!

1. Go to Google Docs and create an empty document.
2. Go to a site like http://#/ and get your unique link.
3. Once you have your link, which should be something like http://iplogger.ru/image.jpg you go ahead and resolve the domain, which you do by simply pinging the domain.

In my example, I will ping the domain # which resolves to 88.198.249.45. My new link will then be http://88.198.249.45/image.jpg

4. Insert the new link into Google Documents, and press on Enter:

5. Click on the link (normal left click), and you will see a box popping up under the link.
6. Mouseover the link and right click on it. Then you press on Copy Link, and you have your Google link, which will redirect to the ip logger!

Example link could be: http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2...25vhIZWZUQ
THE LINK DOES NOT WORK AS AN IP LOGGER. IT'S A FAKE LINK

As you can see, it shows http%3A%2F%2F88.198.249.45%2Fimage.jpg which is the URL to your IP logger. Instead of showing "iplogger.ru", it will show the IP instead.

Simply send that link to your victim, and you'll have their IP (once they click on it).
It will redirect to http://iplogger.ru/spacer.gif which is empty.

Another good thing to do, is to hide the URL. Visit this website: http://encoder.mattiasgeniar.be/index.php
Once you are there, you simply enter the same URL as you entered in Google. The IP logger one. Then scroll down to "URL encode full".
Now go back to the URL you got from Google. It will look something like this: http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2...25vhIZWZUQ - Then you simply replace the http%3A%2F%2F88.198.249.45%2Fimage.jpg with the information from the encoder site. Your new URL should look something like this then:
http://www.google.com/url?q=%68%74%74%70...25vhIZWZUQ

See all the percentage symbols? That is each character encoded.

EXTRA NOTE!
You can embed the image into an email or on a forum, and it will grab the IPs of everyone who visits the page. All you have to do, is embed your http://iplogger.ru/image.jpg link!

Enjoy :)

[crossera]

EXTRA NOTE!
You can embed the image into an email or on a forum, and it will grab the IPs of everyone who visits the page. All you have to do, is embed your http://iplogger.ru/image.jpg link!

Enjoy :)

Awesome tutorial Snorlax ..
But wait if i embed the image in this forum I will grab everyone's ip :D ..
Lol that would be awesome .
🤝🤝

[Lange Ritch]

Does it work if i type [IMG] [/IMG] and it grab still?

['Snorlax]

Does it work if i type [IMG] [/IMG] and it grab still?

Yes it would still grab it.

Awesome tutorial Snorlax ..
But wait if i embed the image in this forum I will grab everyone's ip :D ..
Lol that would be awesome .
🤝🤝

It would yep!

[Race]

This is awesome, people will just think it is a image link I copied from google. :)

['Snorlax]

This is awesome, people will just think it is a image link I copied from google. :)

Exactly! That's the awesome thing about it! :)

[Mr.Phoenix]

Excellent ! It was creative method :) But hacking a computer by ip is difficult. Let me know what are the hacks can we do with an ip rather than doxing??

[Rozyn]

You can use IPLogger.com to get passed Cloud flare protection. (Upload as an avatar)

['Snorlax]

Excellent ! It was creative method :) But hacking a computer by ip is difficult. Let me know what are the hacks can we do with an ip rather than doxing??

You can boot the person ;)

You can use IPLogger.com to get passed Cloud flare protection. (Upload as an avatar)

What's different from # and iplogger.com?

[Automatic Coding]

Few issues with this, although, it's a fair method:-

1. My assumption (I may be wrong) is that the majority of 'IP loggers' will be using shared hosting (Just a guess, because, it's a kind of idiotic thing to make), and, thus, without the 'HOST' header apache won't know which virtual site to serve up (Because you're using the IP).


2. 2. What's wrong with bitly, googl, tinyurl, hugeurl, or any one of the other thousand sites that do this?


3. 3. This can also be done with youtube links, google search result links, and pretty much any site that keeps statistics on it's users.

Personally, I'd just pay $10 for a domain and call it a day (Or year, since it's $10/year), but, it's up to you.

EDIT:- For an example of a shared server (Sorry Fafaffy (Member here)) view this site:-
http://fafaffy.com/

Works fine, right? Now let's try again with just the IP:-

Domain:-

Code

automatic@automatic-G74Sx:~$ curl fafaffy.com -i
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Fri, 03 May 2013 12:28:37 GMT
Server: Apache
Vary: Accept-Encoding
Content-Length: 0
Content-Type: text/html

IP:-

Code

automatic@automatic-G74Sx:~$ nslookup fafaffy.com
Server:        127.0.1.1
Address:    127.0.1.1#53

Non-authoritative answer:
Name:    fafaffy.com
Address: 74.220.215.248

automatic@automatic-G74Sx:~$ curl 74.220.215.248 -i
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Fri, 03 May 2013 12:28:54 GMT
Server: Apache
Accept-Ranges: bytes
Vary: Accept-Encoding
Transfer-Encoding: chunked
Content-Type: text/html

<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>HostMonster - Web hosting</TITLE>
[...404 html...]

[Rozyn]

You can boot the person ;)

What's different from # and iplogger.com?

I meant .org, sorry. I just woke up lol.

[Paradoxmoney]

really good codes to be seen , soon will learn the coding language

['Snorlax]

Few issues with this, although, it's a fair method:-

1. My assumption (I may be wrong) is that the majority of 'IP loggers' will be using shared hosting (Just a guess, because, it's a kind of idiotic thing to make), and, thus, without the 'HOST' header apache won't know which virtual site to serve up (Because you're using the IP).


2. 2. What's wrong with bitly, googl, spam, hugeurl, or any one of the other thousand sites that do this?


3. 3. This can also be done with youtube links, google search result links, and pretty much any site that keeps statistics on it's users.

Personally, I'd just pay $10 for a domain and call it a day (Or year, since it's $10/year), but, it's up to you.

EDIT:- For an example of a shared server (Sorry Fafaffy (Member here)) view this site:-
http://fafaffy.com/

Works fine, right? Now let's try again with just the IP:-

Domain:-

Code

automatic@automatic-G74Sx:~$ curl fafaffy.com -i
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Fri, 03 May 2013 12:28:37 GMT
Server: Apache
Vary: Accept-Encoding
Content-Length: 0
Content-Type: text/html

IP:-

Code

automatic@automatic-G74Sx:~$ nslookup fafaffy.com
Server:        127.0.1.1
Address:    127.0.1.1#53

Non-authoritative answer:
Name:    fafaffy.com
Address: 74.220.215.248

automatic@automatic-G74Sx:~$ curl 74.220.215.248 -i
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Fri, 03 May 2013 12:28:54 GMT
Server: Apache
Accept-Ranges: bytes
Vary: Accept-Encoding
Transfer-Encoding: chunked
Content-Type: text/html

<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>HostMonster - Web hosting</TITLE>
[...404 html...]

To be honest, using a shortener link isn't convincing. If you send someone a http://goo.gl/ link, they'll easily see it's a shortened link. Therefore, using a direct http://google.com/ link, will be more convincing, and will also look better (like a Google search result).

It's all about using Google as your redirect, because everyone knows Google, and most of them trust Google.

[Automatic Coding]

To be honest, using a shortener link isn't convincing. If you send someone a http://goo.gl/ link, they'll easily see it's a shortened link. Therefore, using a direct http://google.com/ link, will be more convincing, and will also look better (like a Google search result).

It's all about using Google as your redirect, because everyone knows Google, and most of them trust Google.

I still prefer links like so:-
https://hackforums.net/redirect.php?url=google.com

['Snorlax]

I still prefer links like so:-
https://hackforums.net/redirect.php?url=google.com

You do? Would the url= redirect to the # then?
That's the whole purpose of using Google.

1) It's trusted by 99.9% of all people (appximately)
2) The link looks like a regular link from Google
3) People without much knowledge, won't be able to see what's "hidden" in the link.