Eh not to hop on the bandwagon, but the others do have a point. The Skype API is probably one of the easiest to use API out there. Yes I understand you're making a thing for people to quickly create a Skype bot with, but people are already making Skype bots with ease. What would be interesting, is a wrapper for Steam4Net, or actually making an implementation for OpenSteamWorks(it's c++, but you could convert it to c#). However, I do applaud your idea, I just don't think it's really necessary.
|
C#
[Beta] SkypeBot Base - The best of the best. |
(Sep 7, 2013 07:42 PM)Skyla Blue Wrote: Eh not to hop on the bandwagon, but the others do have a point. The Skype API is probably one of the easiest to use API out there. Yes I understand you're making a thing for people to quickly create a Skype bot with, but people are already making Skype bots with ease. What would be interesting, is a wrapper for Steam4Net, or actually making an implementation for OpenSteamWorks(it's c++, but you could convert it to c#). However, I do applaud your idea, I just don't think it's really necessary. Well, with a built in command framework, where you can assign various textual commands to functions is quite useful in my opinion. I'm just tired of seeing like if(string.contains("!help")) as well as string splitting when it comes to commands. There just needs to be some kind of centralized framework where it can all be done in one. 
It's alright, all this will be useless when December rolls around. Skype is discontinuing Skype4COM.
(Nov 11, 2013 10:46 PM)Zettabit Wrote: It's alright, all this will be useless when December rolls around. Skype is discontinuing Skype4COM. Not exactly. I've been working on my own version of Skype4COM. This should come out right before Skype officially deems their API useless, therefore we will still have support for it (:  |
|
|
