(Oct 21, 2013 10:22 AM)Vector Dynamics Wrote: Are you sure of that?
Like..Really sure?
yes, I know how it sounds but that's really how it works, I'v tested 1st hand on my computer with AVG, the was picked up and sent to AVG virus vault and still connected to the irc..
Vouch for my old mate yugurt, looks like an awesome product ;)
DO NOT DEAL WITH THIS MEMBER
(Oct 21, 2013 10:28 AM)pwned™ Wrote: Vouch for my old mate yugurt, looks like an awesome product ;)
Thanks man. nice to see you adapted well to hf 😝
DO NOT DEAL WITH THIS MEMBER
(Oct 21, 2013 10:27 AM)TheSonOfTheDevil Wrote: yes, I know how it sounds but that's really how it works, I'v tested 1st hand on my computer with AVG, the was picked up and sent to AVG virus vault and still connected to the irc..
OK, I assume this incorporates some rootkit functionality, correct?
(Oct 21, 2013 10:33 AM)KFC Watermelon Wrote: OK, I assume this incorporates some rootkit functionality, correct?
yes, well i guess on the the definition of rootkit, when i was researching rootkits I learned there was ring0 , ring1, ring2 and ring3 so i pit the main parts together and noticed on ring2 and ring3 on the workings of it so between that and a post on hack forums on working on AV folder I put the two together and hell no i far from got it on first try didn't think it would work but glad it it tho..
DO NOT DEAL WITH THIS MEMBER
Oct 21, 2013 10:58 AM
(This post was last modified: Oct 21, 2013 11:00 AM by KFC Watermelon.)
(Oct 21, 2013 10:41 AM)TheSonOfTheDevil Wrote: yes, well i guess on the the definition of rootkit, when i was researching rootkits I learned there was ring0 , ring1, ring2 and ring3 so i pit the main parts together and noticed on ring2 and ring3 on the workings of it so between that and a post on hack forums on working on AV folder I put the two together and hell no i far from got it on first try didn't think it would work but glad it it tho..
So you're incorporating a ring2-ring3 rootkit? What hooks are you utilizing?
Also, I seen in your development thread that the UDP was amplified, how do you put in a list of DNSs? Also, is the SYN spoofed or super or just regular SYN?
(Oct 21, 2013 10:58 AM)KFC Watermelon Wrote: So you're incorporating a ring2-ring3 rootkit? What hooks are you utilizing?
Also, I seen in your development thread that the UDP was amplified, how do you put in a list of DNSs? Also, is the SYN spoofed or super or just regular SYN?
not sure what your meaning is when you say hooks, but ghost hooks its self onto user32.dll and services.exe running off Async and win32.
and UDP amplified meaning ghost runs off two users the user and administrator so when attacks are sent the ring0 takes effect so if the slave has the built in administrator account (most do) that account+user sending say 6500 both send at same time while keeping stability. so its more its more of a split attack.
Maiya? Seriously dude? Ahaahahahahaha, anyway glws
DO NOT DEAL WITH THIS MEMBER
(Oct 21, 2013 12:01 PM)Agent Raigar Wrote: Maiya? Seriously dude? Ahaahahahahaha, anyway glws
Thanks i guess. 🤮
Don't know what you are implying
(Oct 21, 2013 12:09 PM)Cakeb$$s Wrote: Thanks i guess. 🤮
Don't know what you are implying
oh I'v know him for awhile like a year or two, but back in those days i sucked lol
This looks very promising. Good luck with sales man.
DO NOT DEAL WITH THIS MEMBER
(Oct 21, 2013 01:00 PM)monsterhawt Wrote: This looks very promising. Good luck with sales man.
Thanks. if you have any questions just ask 🤝
this looks promising. i might buy this.]
what crypters are compatible with this
Windows only utilizes rings 0 and 3 for backwards compatibility purposes.
Man if you are going to claim rootkit-like functionality in a CLR based program, you really need to back that up with some indisputable evidence or else it just sounds like more smoke blowing.
Quote:not sure what your meaning is when you say hooks, but ghost hooks its self onto user32.dll and services.exe running off Async and win32.
That does not make sense. Are you talking about SetWindowsHookEx?
(Oct 21, 2013 01:15 PM)betamonkey Wrote: Windows only utilizes rings 0 and 3 for backwards compatibility purposes.
Man if you are going to claim rootkit-like functionality in a CLR based program, you really need to back that up with some indisputable evidence or else it just sounds like more smoke blowing.
That does not make sense. Are you talking about SetWindowsHookEx?
kinda, if you read the post i reply to KFC you will see I only used parts of rootkits not then kootkits its self..
and
as of crypter's most C# crypters should work was only able to test cube crypter at the time cause that's all i had at the time, But there's no eof or anything but as time comes I hope to test ether crypters with it.
|