(Nov 25, 2013 06:26 PM)-๖ۣۜDivine- Wrote: It's a fair warning. But such things most likely will not happen. People here care too much about their influence, position and reputation among the community to do such a thing. A scam like that would be frowned upon, and the group cursed by the insulted community. Whilst the previous statement might be incorrect, that is at least how most of the leaders would think, and that possibility alone stops them from doing this.
Who would attempt to scam and break a partnership if that would mean getting himself labeled as a scammer forever? I doubt such scandal would pass by unnoticed, no one would want to own a group that everyone laughs at. But even so, I wouldn't put my money into someone else's hands no matter how well I know them.
There's already been two cases of that happening since I joined. 😏😏
(Nov 25, 2013 06:40 PM)Anal Voyage. Wrote: There's already been two cases of that happening since I joined. 😏😏
And you're 2012, dafuq, I must be gay. What groups were that?
(Nov 25, 2013 06:41 PM)-๖ۣۜDivine- Wrote: And you're 2012, dafuq, I must be gay. What groups were that?
One was Black Diamond, I believe. Not sure about the other one
(Nov 25, 2013 06:42 PM)xhflhkeuhwguu34 Wrote: One was Black Diamond, I believe. Not sure about the other one
The guy who owned Black Diamond was an idiot who used previous offsite scams to purchase the group, only to scam people out of their money and then sell the group when everyone caught on.
Seem crystal clear to me.
Can I ask you why you won't allow multiple group owners, though?
(Nov 25, 2013 06:44 PM)Vince Wrote: The guy who owned Black Diamond was an idiot who used previous offsite scams to purchase the group, only to scam people out of their money and then sell the group when everyone caught on. He went on a vacation ban of 1 year after making a fake contest.
Nov 25, 2013 06:45 PM
(This post was last modified: Nov 25, 2013 06:46 PM by xflat.)
(Nov 25, 2013 06:44 PM)Cha0 Wrote: Seem crystal clear to me.
Can I ask you why you won't allow multiple group owners, though?
Just causes more unneeded drama that no one wants to read.
I can guess who this is directed at.
(Nov 25, 2013 06:44 PM)Cha0 Wrote: Seem crystal clear to me.
Can I ask you why you won't allow multiple group owners, though?
Like xflat said, it just causes issues with managing the group.
Like if one owner asked Omni to do something and the other told Omni that he disagreed. It would be annoying and would do no good.
(Nov 25, 2013 06:41 PM)-๖ۣۜDivine- Wrote: And you're 2012, dafuq, I must be gay. What groups were that?
From my understanding, they're Black Diamond and the Angels thing.
Deffinitly understand and agree with this rule.
DO NOT DEAL WITH THIS MEMBER
(Nov 25, 2013 05:08 PM)Хypher Wrote: Pretty sure it's more in reference to Vinnie being apart of the purchase of The Alliance.
This doesn't apply to us because T3h Hack3r is the only owner of the group, I'm just a close friend who shares the same interests as him and will be assisting him throughout his venture of him owning a group.
Are you not going to pin this Omni?
Only use HF to deal.
(Nov 25, 2013 07:33 PM)Thornzzz Wrote: Are you not going to pin this Omni?
Why would he have to pin this thread.
(Nov 25, 2013 04:28 PM)Linxy Wrote: I have a feeling I know who this is applying too...
I'm not sure who you are talking about, but this has happened 3 or 4 times at least. It wasn't the first, and it won't be the last.
|
