DO NOT DEAL WITH THIS MEMBER
I'm in need of a project, so why not a booter source
I've already made one, before ( Derpy Booter) but it's pretty old and not good c:
So, what features should a Booter Source include
I'm also looking for how it should connect to the apis/shells (SSH? Or just GET)
Thanks
You need l33t hax.
Things like:
Instant Hitting
Unlimited time
100Gb per boot
No logging.
Each person has their own dedicated server to boot with.
Minecraft, Skype, Steam, Youtube, and Google Chrome resolver.
All that I can think of.
Get your own servers. More power than an API. Also, you'll need to constantly update shells if you use them. I run a private shell booter and it's a pain in the ass. It does work very well though, but they're private shells.
-Benjy
You do both know that he is asking about things to add in a SOURCE , meaning not what is going to be using .
(Mar 2, 2014 12:35 PM)Ordinary Wrote: You do both know that he is asking about things to add in a SOURCE , meaning not what is going to be using .
I read the line before last as if he was asking which is better to use, my B.
-Benjy
DO NOT DEAL WITH THIS MEMBER
Thanks for those suggestions, but like Ordinary said, I'm looking for features to add to a source, not running a booter c:
Mar 2, 2014 02:10 PM
(This post was last modified: Mar 2, 2014 02:18 PM by Vicellus Drum.)
(Mar 2, 2014 10:29 AM)#YOLO Wrote: You need l33t hax.
Things like:
Instant Hitting
Unlimited time
100Gb per boot
No logging.
Each person has their own dedicated server to boot with.
Minecraft, Skype, Steam, Youtube, and Google Chrome resolver.
All that I can think of.
1) Easy
2) Dafuq you think bandwidth is made out of
3) You on drugs?
4) Lol. People log attacks?
5) Hahahaha you think he's made outta money?
6) Google Chrome resolver? wat.
@OP
SSH vs GET? lolwat. You're sending GET requests to a server that accepts the ssh2 protocol. It's not really versus. They're both the same thing. Despite everyone saying that SSH2 will fuck your servers up and there's some magical IRC method that will give your servers golden balls and hit with 60TB/s, they still use SSH2 😏
Okay, so my suggestions are
- Scheduled boots
- concurrent attacks
- curl/ping on servers or IPs
- referral discounts
- live output monitor(If using servers)
DO NOT DEAL WITH THIS MEMBER
Mar 2, 2014 02:21 PM
(This post was last modified: Mar 2, 2014 02:22 PM by Ghetto~~.)
(Mar 2, 2014 02:10 PM)Vicellus Drum Wrote: 1) Easy
2) Dafuq you think bandwidth is made out of
3) You on drugs?
4) Lol. People log attacks?
5) Hahahaha you think he's made outta money?
6) Google Chrome resolver? wat.
@OP
SSH vs GET? lolwat. You're sending GET requests to a server that accepts the ssh2 protocol. It's not really versus. They're both the same thing. Despite everyone saying that SSH2 will fuck your servers up and there's some magical IRC method that will give your servers golden balls and hit with 60TB/s, they still use SSH2 😏
I don't think you understand what I meant .-. (Or I don't understand what you're saying)
By SSH vs GET I meant, should I use SSH (Actually logging in with PHP's SSH Package and sending the commands through there ('perl /path/to/dos.pl ip time port blah blah blah)
Or through GET ( http://server.com/dos.php?vars=Go&Here=)
As for the SSH2 fucking up your servers, I've never heard of that
Of course, it creates more a of a risk if someone compromises your server, because they could easily get the ssh login
EDIT: Your suggestions are the best so far c:
Thanks
Mar 2, 2014 04:18 PM
(This post was last modified: Mar 2, 2014 04:22 PM by ~Tom~.)
(Mar 2, 2014 12:28 PM)Benjamin Franklin Wrote: Get your own servers. More power than an API. Also, you'll need to constantly update shells if you use them. I run a private shell booter and it's a pain in the ass. It does work very well though, but they're private shells.
LOL What, you stuck in 2010 mate ? 😧
(Mar 2, 2014 02:10 PM)Vicellus Drum Wrote: Okay, so my suggestions are
- Scheduled boots
- concurrent attacks
- curl/ping on servers or IPs
- referral discounts
- live output monitor(If using servers)
Get with the times noob, most of those suggestions are already in sources duh. I'll drop you.
IRC system aren't all they're cracked out too be. It can make managing servers slightly easier but meh.
Mar 2, 2014 04:49 PM
(This post was last modified: Mar 2, 2014 04:49 PM by Vicellus Drum.)
(Mar 2, 2014 04:18 PM)~Tom~ Wrote: Get with the times noob, most of those suggestions are already in sources duh. I'll drop you.
Since when did they have to be innovative? He was asking for what features should be on his source, never implied they had to be unheard of 😁
The IRC system sounds like it would use up way too much bandwidth, and would be hard to regulate. I'm gonna stick to SSH2 imo.
Mar 2, 2014 04:57 PM
(This post was last modified: Mar 2, 2014 04:57 PM by ~Tom~.)
(Mar 2, 2014 04:49 PM)Vicellus Drum Wrote: Since when did they have to be innovative? He was asking for what features should be on his source, never implied they had to be unheard of 😁
The IRC system sounds like it would use up way too much bandwidth, and would be hard to regulate. I'm gonna stick to SSH2 imo.
IRC's better for those who are l33t hackers, unlike you. Duh.
|