[GoldStar]

i understand it, but i feel like it's unsecure.
what if the file has numbers in it's eof? that will fuck it off.
btw, the Split is also not 100% secure, but there is a very small chance that the stub or the file contains the split string, specially if the split is some wierd sentence lool. well resources are more secure i think. but thx, good thinking.

[SteloNLD]

i have a little problem because i see this program writes it like this
stub + file + filesize and normal crypter does it like this
stub + spliter + file yes :P i know how to split it but how
does your your function find the lengt of the filesize because could be 1 ore 12
and the eof contains file + filesize and how does this program knows
that the last 2 chars(example 12) ore the last 1 char(example 1) are the filelenth

i am learning code and i tried to understand this and so far i dont see anything good :P because
you even could write stub + file and then use getEOF result : file
in this case it isn't posible to use some thing like booleans
(example indicates if anti's should be activated ore not )
a stub with booleans looks like his stub + split + file + split + 0/1
( if 0 then the anti's are deactivated if 1 then they are enabled)

[pr0t0typ3]

It won't fuck of because there is nomatter of the other files .. only the number that is written afeter that is detected as after eof and will get read.. anyway it#s working and it is okay for asimple crypter and if you want to continue using eof

---

i have a little problem because i see this program writes it like this
stub + file + filesize and normal crypter does it like this
stub + spliter + file yes :P i know how to split it but how
does your your function find the lengt of the filesize because could be 1 ore 12
and the eof contains file + filesize and how does this program knows
that the last 2 chars(example 12) ore the last 1 char(example 1) are the filelenth

i am learning code and i tried to understand this and so far i dont see anything good :P because
you even could write stub + file and then use getEOF result : file
in this case it isn't posible to use some thing like booleans
(example indicates if anti's should be activated ore not )
a stub with booleans looks like his stub + split + file + split + 0/1
( if 0 then the anti's are deactivated if 1 then they are enabled)

It's a kind of strange but the stub+the crypted file is detected as 1 file with 1 eof after teh second file don't knwo why xD

[smp211]

What is the purpose of writing the file.Length in the write_file sub?

[pr0t0typ3]

What is the purpose of writing the file.Length in the write_file sub?

It is used to fin the start of the second file agian becuase you don't use any splits

[SteloNLD]

lol i think i understand

files arent detected as after EOF

so program will think eof is filesize

but when you use

stub + splitter + file

then the splitter is detected as in EOF and because other file is after the spliter(EOF) the av thinks it is other file :P because he sees it as file and in this case he knows it is been written after the EOF

am i richt ore did i explain it the noobie way

[smp211]

It is used to fin the start of the second file agian becuase you don't use any splits

Can you explain where it fits into:

ex = in1.Substring(in1.Length - read_sze.Length - read_sze, read_sze)

Or am i misunderstanding where file.Length is used?

[Bitwin]

Pretty good(haven't used yet),
I'll still use resoruces because IMO it's much easier after Julians example (I made some functions out of it.)

[SteloNLD]

lol i know how to use this with booleans

write is like this:
stub + file + splitter + filesize + boolean

this work because if he wont detect filesize's as something bad he wont think it of booleans and normal text is no code so this is not detected to :P

is this true then ur are fucking awesome other wise this will be useless for advanced crypters(i think)

[GoldStar]

lol i know how to use this with booleans

write is like this:
stub + file + splitter + filesize + boolean

this work because if he wont detect filesize's as something bad he wont think it of booleans and normal text is no code so this is not detected to :P

is this true then ur are fucking awesome other wise this will be useless for advanced crypters(i think)

i think avira is detecting the first EOF, of the stub. cuz it reads it all, and read sections of a valid win32 app, to get the size of the app compiled. then the left is EOF Data. but i hope i'm wrong loool.

[pr0t0typ3]

this is just an simple example if you only want to write on file .. if you want to write differnt inofs you would have to mod this functions

---

i think avira is detecting the first EOF, of the stub. cuz it reads it all, and read sections of a valid win32 app, to get the size of the app compiled. then the left is EOF Data. but i hope i'm wrong loool.

If you simply write a "/" between the 2 file it will also bedetcted.. I can't explain but it is working for now so plz guys I'm not a macigan I just foudn out how to do this

[SteloNLD]

i think avira is detecting the first EOF, of the stub. cuz it reads it all, and read sections of a valid win32 app, to get the size of the app compiled. then the left is EOF Data. but i hope i'm wrong loool.

?? with first EOF u mean the file(encrypted virus :P)

[Deathader]

Ew ew ew ew EW. Do NOT use fileput!

[GoldStar]

?? with first EOF u mean the file(encrypted virus :P)

yes it should be detected all of it as EOF Data. or i think so.

[Bitwin]

Ew ew ew ew EW. Do NOT use fileput!

Agreed.