[TheBarret]

Overall good and nice project , props for that mate.

i got one cristism point, you list "- Doesn't support WPF .exe !" as feature, that makes no sense to me ,of something that does "not" improve or has "not" extra to it , can't really be called a feature.

[sh@rp]

Overall good and nice project , props for that mate.

i got one cristism point, you list "- Doesn't support WPF .exe !" as feature, that makes no sense to me ,of something that does "not" improve or has "not" extra to it , can't really be called a feature.

Thx TheBarret. ;)

There are plenty of original topics that I would like to edit but I can't do this with a simple account like mine .. 🙃

[img]http://imabox.fr/a3/1415091130eJRYzb58.png[/img]

[TheBarret]

Thx TheBarret. ;)

There are plenty of original topics that I would like to edit but I can't do this with a simple account like mine .. 🙃

[img]http://imabox.fr/a3/1415091130eJRYzb58.png[/img]

ugh the "do this, and you can't do that" on freaking forum... oh well you get my point ^^

[Cornflower Blue இڿڰۣ-ڰۣ—]

ugh the "do this, and you can't do that" on freaking forum... oh well you get my point ^^

That and the PM space is why I upgraded to l33t, so wurf.

[sh@rp]

That and the PM space is why I upgraded to l33t, so wurf.

Or it's also possible to create as many topics as there are version of my software with an account like mine ... 🤦‍♂

[XmysteriousX]

thanks for share seem really good i will try for sure

[sh@rp]

Updated to 1.1.3 :

- BugFix : the Assembly is loaded into an AppDomain to be unloaded correctly
- Added : loading Assembly Infos via reflection

https://bitbucket.org/3dotdev/dotnet-renamer

[๖ۣۜDødøsky]

sick release bro <3 im gonna try it sometimes thx for sharing

[Washi]

Seems like an interesting project! How does it handle applications that have complex object oriented structures, like overridden or inherited methods ? Back in the days when I wrote an obfuscator, I had quite a bit of trouble with this.

[sh@rp]

Seems like an interesting project! How does it handle applications that have complex object oriented structures, like overridden or inherited methods ? Back in the days when I wrote an obfuscator, I had quite a bit of trouble with this.

It's very complex to set up so the tool doesn't manage it like Reflection and so on ! I mean that it doesn't rename overriden methods ..... and corrupts the binary file if it contains Reflection calls.

Your obfuscator : TUP Obfuscator or DotNetSuppress ??

[Cook John]

Good release sir 🤝 to keep this thread alive

[0xBB]

I don't get it, a user posted something similar and he got flammed because it's a simple "methods/fields etc" renamer. How is this different? As you said, it also corrupt method calls that use reflection. EX: GetMethod("MyMethod")

[sh@rp]

sick release bro <3 im gonna try it sometimes thx for sharing

I keep up the good work. Thank you.. ;)

Good release sir 🤝 to keep this thread alive

Thanks bro. 🙂

I don't get it, a user posted something similar and he got flammed because it's a simple "methods/fields etc" renamer. How is this different? As you said, it also corrupt method calls that use reflection. EX: GetMethod("MyMethod")

It's up to you Ibennz...... 🙂

a user posted something similar and he got flammed because it's a simple "methods/fields etc" renamer

humm ..where can I find it ???
To be honest some of basic Obfuscator/Renamer are corrupt file without method calls that use Reflection.....

As you said, it also corrupt method calls that use reflection. EX: GetMethod("MyMethod")

...have you got any recomandation to fix that ..???

How is this different?

I just do my best to improve my private one (DotNet Patcher v4) :
DotNet Patcher v4 is based on my DotNet Renamer project :

[img]http://www.imabox.fr/a4/1423102132I0WIpV57.png[/img]

Never mind but compared to some project on this board,
I don't think it's ridiculous or considered unnecessary......

[sh@rp]

Updated to 1.1.4 :

- Modified : ICore20Reader Interface
- Added : Cls_Task to improve and simplify the use of the assembly Renamer

How to simply use the tool :

Code

Dim _param = New Cls_Parameters(TxbSelectedFile.Text, TxbSelectedFile.Text & "-Renamed.exe")
      If _param.isValidFile Then

      Dim _paramArgs As New Cls_RenamerState() With { _
      .Namespaces = True, _
      .Types = True, _
      .Methods = True, _
      .Properties = True, _
      .CustomAttributes = True, _
      .Events = True, _
      .Fields = True, _
      .Parameters = True, _
      .Variables = True, _
      .RenameMainNamespaceSetting = Cls_RenamerState.RenameMainNamespace.NotOnly, _
      .ReplaceNamespacesSetting = Cls_RenamerState.ReplaceNamespaces.Empty, _
      .RenamingType = Cls_RandomizerType.RenameEnum.Chinese, _
      .RenameRuleSetting = Cls_RenamerState.RenameRule.Personalize}

      Dim _Task = New Cls_Task(_param, _paramArgs)
      _Task.StartTask()

      MessageBox.Show("Renamed :" & vbNewLine & vbNewLine & _
      "Namespace(s) : " & _Task.Result.Item("Namespace").ToString & vbNewLine & _
      "Type(s) : " & _Task.Result.Item("Type").ToString & vbNewLine & _
      "Method(s) : " & _Task.Result.Item("Method").ToString & vbNewLine & _
      "Parameter(s) : " & _Task.Result.Item("Parameter").ToString & vbNewLine & _
      "Generic Parameter(s) : " & _Task.Result.Item("Generic Parameter").ToString & vbNewLine & _
      "Variable(s) : " & _Task.Result.Item("Variable").ToString & vbNewLine & _
      "Property(s) : " & _Task.Result.Item("Property").ToString & vbNewLine & _
      "Event(s) : " & _Task.Result.Item("Event").ToString & vbNewLine & _
      "Field(s) : " & _Task.Result.Item("Field").ToString _
      , "Completed", MessageBoxButtons.OK, MessageBoxIcon.Information)

      End If

https://bitbucket.org/3dotdev/dotnet-renamer

[Aristocles]

Just received a crack-me protected with DotNet Renamer : Lot of improvement since I last checked it, now decryption stuff are not static anymore and the whole obfuscated output is very complex, so this is definitively a very good obfuscator !