Can someone please help me make a C# Crypter stub?
My skype is : n3ptuneleak
Thanks!
My skype is : n3ptuneleak
Thanks!
|
C#
C# FUD Crypter Stub |
(Apr 12, 2015 03:57 AM)Minimal. Wrote: Uhm, if you can pay... Sure why not! Add me on skype then mate and see what we can do. (Apr 12, 2015 04:14 AM)Ravent Wrote: Try out using some obfuscator, can help a lot. Not sure if I have to -3rep you for saying such a bullshit things, or if you were kidding ❓
Assert failure(PID 10704 [0x000029d0], Thread: 10960 [0x2ad0]): pBuffer != NULL
Apr 18, 2015 10:51 AM
(This post was last modified: Apr 18, 2015 10:52 AM by Ravent.)
(Apr 12, 2015 12:29 PM)Aristocles Wrote: Not sure if I have to -3rep you for saying such a bullshit things, or if you were kidding ❓ No, i mean just can help to fud, no to create one. Sorry if i dont explained correctly (Apr 18, 2015 10:51 AM)Ravent Wrote: No, i mean just can help to fud, no to create one. Sorry if i dont explained correctly Why would you use a third party software to FUD your stub. By doing it you are making false detections on legitimate software that uses obfuscators to protect their code. You should stop doing that. (Apr 19, 2015 11:33 AM)Zyklon A Wrote: Why would you use a third party software to FUD your stub. By doing it you are making false detections on legitimate software that uses obfuscators to protect their code. Excellent Point. Its easy to "FUD" a stub without using any Software just by rewritting your stub. Find a unique storage way , be creative . I would suggest to learn something about the PE-Format. There are so many crypter sources out there try to understand how a crypter works.
I simply meant that if you have no idea how to make a crypter you can start using some obfuscator to rename variables. Starting from there, then you just do it on your own because you will not get a single file undetectable with an obfuscator, it's just a good base to start if you have no knowledge.
English is not my main language, so excuse me if I didn't explain myself properly. (Apr 20, 2015 05:59 AM)Zyklon A Wrote: No, you explained it very nice but using obfuscators to fud your code is kind of a dick move. I really Know it, is very unproffesional and just is for people starting to see how it works. (Apr 20, 2015 06:01 AM)Ravent Wrote: I really Know it, is very unproffesional and just is for people starting to see how it works. If you know that is unproffesional why do you suggest it. You should never say anything like that. Do you know how hard is to protect the legitimate software with obfuscators because of the false detections. It is pain in the ass for developers because skids use it to fud their malware. (Apr 20, 2015 06:06 AM)Zyklon A Wrote: If you know that is unproffesional why do you suggest it. You should never say anything like that. Do you know how hard is to protect the legitimate software with obfuscators because of the false detections. It is pain in the ass for developers because skids use it to fud their malware. I know many people have modded obfuscators and private protections so only the public obfuscators will be affected and also normally if you dont have an private or modded obfuscator you can found many autounpackers tools like with Confuser/ConfuserEx, Smart Assembly etc, i just recommend it cause he need to know how works all first and then he can try to do something resemblant. |
|
|
| Possibly Related Threads... | |||
| Thread / Author | Replies | Views | Last Post |
| [.NET] by Yorkiebar15Aug 12, 2015 09:25 PM | 109 | 20,537 |
Aug 12, 2015 09:25 PM Last Post: superpengie |
| [C] by ❤️Fetz❤️Oct 15, 2013 09:35 AM | 13 | 917 |
Oct 15, 2013 09:35 AM Last Post: m0mathur |
| [.NET] by LastS0ulMay 17, 2013 03:53 AM | 9 | 355 |
May 17, 2013 03:53 AM Last Post: ident |