Jun 23, 2015 12:53 PM
(This post was last modified: Jun 23, 2015 02:19 PM by Hexicidal.)
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1f5zx15i...wanalytics
Google does a summary that is very visually appealing, but it doesn't give us a lot of information to go with. It doesn't list all feedback responses, and only truly lists the votes given, the median, and mode.
At the end of the survey, I had roughly 320 responses. I deleted invalid responses to the point of 230 exactly.
Throughout this survey, I had big issues with two groups. One being Echo, and the other Instinct. A majority of members would troll the survey by rating Instinct 10 and Echo 1, and vice versa. I deleted those responses. Actions like this in the name of your group represent poorly on your maturity and group image. I don't consider actions like that beneficial in any manner and it's a waste of our time.
Don't be a shithead, shitheads.
If you would like to see what individuals wrote regarding group feedback, please click the following link and scroll and to the bottom, as visually that is the best format I can present it in. https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1f5zx15i...wanalytics
Null - Average: 5.528634361
Echo - Average: 4.5
Specialists - Average: 5.10222222
Red Lions - Average: 4.972850679
Instinct - Average: 5.178571429
Archive - Average: 5.515837104
Crypto - Average: 5.188340807
AnimeFAN!- Average: 4.1875
L'appel du vide - Average: 7.180995475
Pirates - Average: 5.045454545
Debug - Average: 4.857777778
Titans - Average: 5.627272727
The Brotherhood - Average: 5.713004484
-
Best to worst.
Assume statistical bias since I'm the contest holder and members are more willing to evaluate my group as being better. So, disregard my group's position.
1. L'appel du vide - Average: 7.180995475
2. The Brotherhood - Average: 5.713004484
3. Titans - Average: 5.627272727
4. Null - Average: 5.528634361
5. Archive - Average: 5.515837104
6. Crypto - Average: 5.188340807
7. Instinct - Average: 5.178571429
8. Specialists - Average: 5.10222222
9. Pirates - Average: 5.045454545
10. Red Lions - Average: 4.972850679
11. Debug - Average: 4.857777778
12. Echo - Average: 4.5
13. AnimeFAN!- Average: 4.1875
Hexicidal's personal notes.
For a long time I have defended groups for their direction and status on the forum. I love to see other members succeed and continue to push the limit of their endeavors. However, in recent times I see nearly all groups falling short of any respectable status. Groups owners need to get their shit together. There are only three groups on this forum that are worth anything.
My new approach to student entry... Buy ins have been the downfall of my group previously, I hope to keep it different this time. I don't know how successful I will be on that front though. I want new members that wish to engage in something different and provide a new setting of variety to my subforum.
I can effectively divide HF groups into two sections.
Low activity and quality discussions.
High activity and nothing but shit posts.
There is an level of equilibrium that is very difficult to achieve for group activity, and I don't feel that any group is a master of this. Not like internal group activity matters much anyway. All groups are, are outsider's perspective on the users that wear said userbar.
That you everyone for engaging in the survey. I will have one again in the future, stay tuned.
Google does a summary that is very visually appealing, but it doesn't give us a lot of information to go with. It doesn't list all feedback responses, and only truly lists the votes given, the median, and mode.
At the end of the survey, I had roughly 320 responses. I deleted invalid responses to the point of 230 exactly.
Throughout this survey, I had big issues with two groups. One being Echo, and the other Instinct. A majority of members would troll the survey by rating Instinct 10 and Echo 1, and vice versa. I deleted those responses. Actions like this in the name of your group represent poorly on your maturity and group image. I don't consider actions like that beneficial in any manner and it's a waste of our time.
Don't be a shithead, shitheads.
If you would like to see what individuals wrote regarding group feedback, please click the following link and scroll and to the bottom, as visually that is the best format I can present it in. https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1f5zx15i...wanalytics
Null - Average: 5.528634361
Echo - Average: 4.5
Specialists - Average: 5.10222222
Red Lions - Average: 4.972850679
Instinct - Average: 5.178571429
Archive - Average: 5.515837104
Crypto - Average: 5.188340807
AnimeFAN!- Average: 4.1875
L'appel du vide - Average: 7.180995475
Pirates - Average: 5.045454545
Debug - Average: 4.857777778
Titans - Average: 5.627272727
The Brotherhood - Average: 5.713004484
-
Best to worst.
Assume statistical bias since I'm the contest holder and members are more willing to evaluate my group as being better. So, disregard my group's position.
1. L'appel du vide - Average: 7.180995475
2. The Brotherhood - Average: 5.713004484
3. Titans - Average: 5.627272727
4. Null - Average: 5.528634361
5. Archive - Average: 5.515837104
6. Crypto - Average: 5.188340807
7. Instinct - Average: 5.178571429
8. Specialists - Average: 5.10222222
9. Pirates - Average: 5.045454545
10. Red Lions - Average: 4.972850679
11. Debug - Average: 4.857777778
12. Echo - Average: 4.5
13. AnimeFAN!- Average: 4.1875
Hexicidal's personal notes.
For a long time I have defended groups for their direction and status on the forum. I love to see other members succeed and continue to push the limit of their endeavors. However, in recent times I see nearly all groups falling short of any respectable status. Groups owners need to get their shit together. There are only three groups on this forum that are worth anything.
My new approach to student entry... Buy ins have been the downfall of my group previously, I hope to keep it different this time. I don't know how successful I will be on that front though. I want new members that wish to engage in something different and provide a new setting of variety to my subforum.
I can effectively divide HF groups into two sections.
Low activity and quality discussions.
High activity and nothing but shit posts.
There is an level of equilibrium that is very difficult to achieve for group activity, and I don't feel that any group is a master of this. Not like internal group activity matters much anyway. All groups are, are outsider's perspective on the users that wear said userbar.
That you everyone for engaging in the survey. I will have one again in the future, stay tuned.
![[Image: 12XdAdJ.gif]](https://i.imgur.com/12XdAdJ.gif)




![[Image: npafFhp.gif]](https://i.imgur.com/npafFhp.gif)
