Home Upgrade Search Memberlist Extras Hacker Tools Award Goals Help Wiki Contact

Orcus Remote Administrator

If you can add enough features to be able to compare to LL i think this could become the new best rat on hf simply because if the multiple server thing actually lets you have near infinite clients just by making a new server every 10,000 clients it would be very unique and the only rat that can support that much.

Edit: Also i think i would buy this if it was 30$
(Feb 7, 2016 04:48 PM)Binary Ghoul Wrote:  If you can add enough features to be able to compare to LL i think this could become the new best rat on hf simply because if the multiple server thing actually lets you have near infinite clients just by making a new server every 10,000 clients it would be very unique and the only rat that can support that much.

Edit: Also i think i would buy this if it was 30$

I have not gotten to screen snapping the clients functionality, yet. But it is compatible.
I want to further note, the plugin and code injection functionality sets this apart giving it an almost universal use. 🎉
If you want this to be very successful and make a fuck ton off it, you need to have unique original ideas. Orgy pointed out a good one with the onion, reverse socks would be a great one along with an inbuilt dStat so users can see how much power they are putting off with the ddos. Think outside the box. Look at the market and get something 'different'. Thats my advice.
(Feb 7, 2016 05:34 PM)Nex+ Wrote:  If you want this to be very successful and make a fuck ton off it, you need to have unique original ideas. Orgy pointed out a good one with the onion, reverse socks would be a great one along with an inbuilt dStat so users can see how much power they are putting off with the ddos. Think outside the box. Look at the market and get something 'different'. Thats my advice.

Reverse socks is already in place my friend.
Onion recommend is being discussed now, thats a fantastic idea I agree.
You shouldnt inspire from public code like the Quasar GitHub.
(Feb 7, 2016 05:34 PM)Nex+ Wrote:  If you want this to be very successful and make a fuck ton off it, you need to have unique original ideas. Orgy pointed out a good one with the onion, reverse socks would be a great one along with an inbuilt dStat so users can see how much power they are putting off with the ddos. Think outside the box. Look at the market and get something 'different'. Thats my advice.

You should follow your own advice more.
[Image: vjPWhyy.gif]
(Feb 7, 2016 05:38 PM)$lick Wrote:  You should follow your own advice more.

Says the one who owns one of my old products.
(Feb 7, 2016 05:37 PM)Wardow Wrote:  You shouldnt inspire from public code like the Quasar GitHub.

I have a direct agreement with Maxxor/developer for use of that single specific function, thanks for noticing. 🤝
I think a good RAT should sell for $50-75
(Feb 7, 2016 05:40 PM)Armada Wrote:  I have a direct agreement with Maxxor/developer for use of that single specific function, thanks for noticing. 🤝

Even with his agreement, selling public code is a rip off, coding remote administration tools in languages that depends on the .NET Framework doesnt compete much these times, and anyway any feature you will make will not attract much customers the only things that attract customers are very illegal features which are not allowed on Hackforums.
(Feb 7, 2016 05:39 PM)Nex+ Wrote:  Says the one who owns one of my old products.

Haters gonna hate 😝
(Feb 7, 2016 05:39 PM)Nex+ Wrote:  Says the one who owns one of my old products.

And by "your product" you mean something you paid somebody to re-theme?
[Image: vjPWhyy.gif]
(Feb 7, 2016 05:43 PM)Wardow Wrote:  Even with his agreement, selling public code is a rip off, coding remote administration tools in languages that depends on the .NET Framework doesnt compete much these times, and anyway any feature you will make will not attract much customers the only things that attract customers are very illegal features which are not allowed on Hackforums.

Firstly, your wrong, we went with a function that works, why would I have Developer bust his ass unnecessarily for a function that already works perfectly fine?
There is no reason, so it wont be focused on, maybe later, but we can improve on other functions, FIRST.
Again, I dont normally BACK products often, I am on this because I see the developers hard work, he has been totally candid with me and I believe in the product itself.

Haters gonna hate, I suppose.
You cant compare the product to others yet, only the Beta testers can, and I assure you, they will say what I am.
I highly recommend anyone interested in this product to stay clear.

OP seems to be throwing around countless terms without even any knowledge of his product(s).
(Feb 7, 2016 06:15 PM)deiski Wrote:  I highly recommend anyone interested in this product to stay clear.

OP seems to be throwing around countless terms without even any knowledge of his product(s).

Allow the core developer to answer then.


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread / Author Replies Views Last Post
[Community Alert] by ArmadaDec 12, 2017 05:34 AM 9 346 Dec 12, 2017 05:34 AM
Last Post: Armada
[Community Alert] by ArmadaOct 25, 2016 08:03 AM 36 1,861 Oct 25, 2016 08:03 AM
Last Post: Armada
by Professor Foxy™Sep 18, 2013 09:34 PM 2 85 Sep 18, 2013 09:34 PM
Last Post: Professor Foxy™