[actelcxa]

Well,I coded this stub in the past for some project
But now i think it's time to share it out
Stub is around 1.5 mb (quite large) .But it's free,dont ask for better stuff.

And it's FUD of course :

[img]http://NoDistribute.com/result/image/PBpr8HCyRc0qu7KNeQtjTS5z.png[/img]


Private Stub :



*NOTE:
-Use it at your own risk,i will not take any reponsibility
-Dont scan it on virustotal.com (well,scan if u want but it will not fud soon)
-If it needed,scan on nodistribute.com
-Crypter credit to Aegyst coder,stub is coded by me (myself)

*Download Link:
[deleted]

---

Seems no one interested about free + fud crypter?

[ℛoot]

Wrong section you need to post this here Cryptography, Encryption, and Decryption



Also I wont touch this file even with 10 feet long stick!

[President Morty]

10 post.
Would not recommend downloading until the Aegis file is confirmed to be legit.
Wrong section.

[actelcxa]

10 post.
Would not recommend downloading until the Aegis file is confirmed to be legit.
Wrong section.

You can only download and use stub.
Can use crypter on the main page or use on your vmware

[Nick (Name)]

I'll confirm if there is a backdoor, most people who make private programs usually add an anti-skid to prevent anyone from downloading it and distributing the file on a mass scale.

[President Morty]

I'll confirm if there is a backdoor, most people who make private programs usually add an anti-skid to prevent anyone from downloading it and distributing the file on a mass scale.

By looking at the file sizes from Aegis's site and the file downloaded they are the same.
Either someone is a god at file pumping or hes telling the truth. Either way i'm just a skeptical person concerned with hf user's security

[actelcxa]

I'll confirm if there is a backdoor, most people who make private programs usually add an anti-skid to prevent anyone from downloading it and distributing the file on a mass scale.

Thanks you.Just check it and reply here

[Nick (Name)]

The detections are through the roof, I wouldn't trust this stub or crypter. This is a scan of a PE with the stub provided by OP:

Large Image (Click to View)

[actelcxa]

Are you stupid or something ? It's source code you can download from Aegyst main site,it for new developer?
Dont you see it on source/bin folder ,it is compiled by the Aegyst coder (VS2012)

[E-Nonymous]

Are you stupid or something ? It's source code you can download from Aegyst main site,it for new developer?
Dont you see it on source folder?

He's saying your stub isnt fud. I dont really trust this either regardless

[actelcxa]

He's saying your stub isnt fud. I dont really trust this either regardless

Regread of what? He is stupid.Sure
He scan the simple source/which i compiled based on simple source aegyst coder give out for people who want to code their own stub.
And i dont tell people it is stub.That file from the sourcecode/bin/release/ folder. I compiled it at the first time i see the source to know if it work well.
I capture image of my stub and it is in Stub Folder

[Nick (Name)]

Regread of what? He is stupid.Sure
He scan the simple source/which i compiled based on simple source aegyst coder give out for people who want to code their own stub.
And i dont tell people it is stub.That file from the sourcecode/bin/release/ folder. I compiled it at the first time i see the source to know if it work well.
I capture image of my stub and it is in Stub Folder

I'm not fucking stupid, I know that this is the original source of Aegyst Crypter, it's that your "stub" is NOT FUD! I crypted a PE with your stub and it returned back mad detections. Just because your bin is FUD on scan doesn't mean that a PE that you have crypted with the stub is. I think this thread should be deleted or moved as it does not belong in this section of the forum.

[actelcxa]

I'm not fucking stupid, I know that this is the original source of Aegyst Crypter, it's that your "stub" is NOT FUD! I crypted a PE with your stub and it returned back mad detections. Just because your bin is FUD on scan doesn't mean that a PE that you have crypted with the stub is. I think this thread should be deleted or moved as it does not belong in this section of the forum.

1. Test.exe is not my stub. It is the original simple source code i compile to test,and it not on Stub (folder)
2. It fud even with runtime / Test with Eset nod 32 and Avira. If u can,test with more AV
3.Try to change your icon or assembly version,use resource hacker. Because the Assembly version and icon that Aegyst use is old and be hooked,AV detect it not mean stub is not fud lol

[Nick (Name)]

1. Test.exe is not my stub. It is the original simple source code i compile to test,and it not on Stub (folder)
2. It fud even with runtime / Test with Eset nod 32 and Avira. If u can,test with more AV
3.Try to change your icon or assembly version,use resource hacker. Because the Assembly version and icon that Aegyst use is old and be hooked,AV detect it not mean stub is not fud lol

Dude test.exe is a crypted file with your stub. Your stub is NOT FUD, it doesn't bypass scantime scans what makes you think it will get past memory scanners. This thread is useless and me arguing with a member who uses english from google translate is worthless. Good luck to anyone who tries to use this 'FUD' stub, I can guarantee that it is not backdoored but the stub is not FUD.

[Pharmacist]

Actually the software itself should be clean. 
Includes stub sources as well.

---

Dude test.exe is a crypted file with your stub. Your stub is NOT FUD, it doesn't bypass scantime scans what makes you think it will get past memory scanners. This thread is useless and me arguing with a member who uses english from google translate is worthless. Good luck to anyone who tries to use this 'FUD' stub, I can guarantee that it is not backdoored but the stub is not FUD.

Scan is fud:
https://www.pscan.xyz/results.php?id=snowfZfDcQZEFacl

Just encrypted a darkcomet server.