[PAGMAN]

About

A few days ago, I was thinking about some alternatives to obfuscation when this idea came to mind. I did not get this from anyone else's work. Even though a member told me that this was already done, I haven't seen it anywhere yet.
This is a very powerful protection method. It is practically IMPOSSIBLE to run a protected program on a computer that it is not licensed to. Even if a cracker reverses all of the stub code, It is still extremely difficult to run the attached file if the cracker doesn't know what he\she is doing.
This is a complete noob-proof anti-leak method.
##Credits to Deathader for his Avira Bypass. Credits to me for this method of protection (Unless someone tells me who, if anyone, originally made it)##

Screenshot

[img]http://i29.[censored].com/ofrpdc.gif[/img]
(yes, I spelt "customers" wrong. lol)

Download

Source Code:
http://www.4shared.com/file/nA7iEVNY/BitCrypt.html

Test App:
http://www.4shared.com/file/R4uDiXmn/crp...crypt.html

Upcoming Changes

With the creation of HeavyKey, There is no feasible way to bruteforce this. More info about HeavyKey is in my sig.

.

[Boxxy]

Hmm, send me a program. I bet I can get it to run ;]

[PAGMAN]

Hmm, send me a program. I bet I can get it to run ;]

How much would you like to bet? lol. Look at the code and then reconsider :D

[Rue]

You spelled 'customer' wrong.

EDIT: Too bad running shit in memory kills the stability of almost everything.

[PAGMAN]

You spelled 'customer' wrong.

Lol, I refreshed the page and saw your comment just after adding to the OP that I spelt it wrong.

---

Just posted a test application! Good luck

---

You spelled 'customer' wrong.

EDIT: Too bad running shit in memory kills the stability of almost everything.

Yes, But only paying costumers can get it into memory. It is still more secure than obfuscation IMO.

[PAGMAN]

Wow, I am really surprised that this was not as popular as I expected it to be...

[Neroxan]

lemme guess
If hwid = false then it dosent inject?

There are spoofers for some forms of HWID, not everything has to do with your file alone when it comes to protection...

Ontop of that, I have a program that once injected into memory, would allow me to dump this back out. Thus pretty much fucking up the whole "memory defense" game plan

[Surpintine]

You shouldn't be so cocky saying this is "impossible to crack", but it will keep complete noobs away. A beginner-intermediate hacker wouldn't have too much trouble cracking it however. But the idea is really nice, keep working at it.

[South Park]

Thanks, will look into this :)
obfucate your file b4 you use this is more secure btw ^_^

[Dark_Knight_]

Very nice !
:):):):):):):):)

Code

t

[jkymmel]

Ill try moding it and changing the GUI :), I won't release it, but if I do, ill give credits :)
btw, does it mean that some codes wont work, when you run it in memory

[South Park]

This is simple...

Why didn't I ever think of this? 0_o

[ubbelol]

This is nowhere near fool-proof -.- And it's very possible to run the embedded bytes

[DarkSeven46]

Thanks for the source. Will be reading it.

[PAGMAN]

Glad most of you liked it. And I do agree, I shouldn't have said that it was "impossible" to crack. The thought of a HWID spoofer slipped my mind at the time of posting.

EDIT: I am planning on adding more information into the text to be hashed other than just the motherboards HWID. If I had all of the HDDs and motherboard hashed, It would be much more difficult to spoof. Also, A while ago, I remember reading a memory protection program on CodeProject. I skimmed over it and it looks like a very good way to protect applications from being dumped\modified from\in memory.