[James Burnham]

Scan no1: https://virustotal.com/el/file/45a6fae86...496821230/
Scan no2: https://virustotal.com/el/file/4f858c3c7.../analysis/

[ɡringo]

Scan the executable on hybrid analysis, it'll give you a better reading than just virustotal.

https://www.hybrid-analysis.com

[5chn4pp]

50% of those are false, but I'd like to know where you got the files from, and scan them with hybrid analysis.

[ᴍᴏᴋᴀ]

Well it depends on what the files are if they are hacking stuff they are most likely to be false but then again they could be crypted.

[James Burnham]

These belong to a turboer.
Here is the hybrid-analysis: https://www.hybrid-analysis.com/sample/4...mentId=100
What are your thoughts?

[5chn4pp]

These belong to a turboer.
Here is the hybrid-analysis: https://www.hybrid-analysis.com/sample/4...mentId=100
What are your thoughts?

It's labeled as Riskware.HackTool.Agent which is a potentially unwanted application. It's not likely it's malicious, but there is a chance, hence the usage of the word "riskware".

[Aura]

It's useless to upload .rar archive to VirusTotal.

Also:

Code

Generic CIL Executable (.NET, Mono, etc.) (63.1%)

dnSpy it.