[Meow]

Wait so, just to get this straight, you're saying none of you guys have broken any rules but you're still a bunch of lying bastards?

Strong defence...

I was never involved in any of those vouch groups or whatever you want to call them, I sold 2 ebooks in my 5 year hf "career", both of them were sold for $1 if I remember correctly.

[Rikz]

How to properly review ebooks.

Vouch for this method. HQ and works.

[Mac]

Mr. Reviewers thread brought light on sellers who get the same members to vouch constantly for one another. It doesn't matter that the rule came into effort after, they are still scummy for behaving in that manner.

[Cylow]

Vouch for this method. HQ and works.

I have reported you for multiple vouching and buddy bumping.

[Happeh]

Mr. Reviewers thread brought light on sellers who get the same members to vouch constantly for one another. It doesn't matter that the rule came into effort after, they are still scummy for behaving in that manner.

Think I'm about to actually agree with Package.

I feel fucking gross.

[Rikz]

I have reported you for multiple vouching and buddy bumping.

wait no!
Umm
This is not the Rikz you are looking for.. 👹

[J. McCarthy]

Posting a few times isn't the problem.
Posting 20-40 times with retarded shit posts is the problem.

[Copywriter]

Posting a few times isn't the problem.
Posting 20-40 times with retarded shit posts is the problem.

Exactly, even before the rule. Stupid then, still fucking stupid now.

[Bαker]

Exactly, even before the rule. Stupid then, still fucking stupid now.

Agreed - I think what Meow is trying to say they don't possibly deserve the penalty of buddy bump as clearly they haven't done it since the room was implement.

Are they scummy for it? Yes, do they deserve to be closed, no they do shitting tactics to make sales but hey life is a bitch people should look more in-depth before making a purchase.

[Greg]

Wait so, just to get this straight, you're saying none of you guys have broken any rules but you're still a bunch of lying bastards?

Strong defence...

A ton of people got their posting privileges suspended and there were people who got banned for doing it. If i recall correctly i got post banned 2 diff times and one time i got a 90% warning. We already paid our dues on what we did which was that we got banned or post banned. The point of Mr. Reviewer making the thread is that he wants us to get banned again for something we already basically served time for. That's like asking someone who spent 5 years in a jail to serve his/her time to go back to jail again for the same crime they already served. That and also seems like he also loves attention. Most people ( not all) are just like little sheep who always follow the pack. Someone will say "Oh H3god's ebooks are trash" or say "So and so's product is bad" when they've never bought a product from them. Compared to my sales there is only a small % of people who don't like them but there will never be a product in existence that everyone likes. All it takes is one person who doesn't like you/is jealous of you/etc.. to start a lie and it will spread and the idiots will follow the lie. Don't be an idiot and make your own decisions. Don't let other people influence your decisions.

[Meow]

Agreed - I think what Meow is trying to say they don't possibly deserve the penalty of buddy bump as clearly they haven't done it since the room was implement.

Pretty much this, I AGREE buddy bumps and all that shit is stupid but why all of a sudden expose all of them when literally half of them are closed/banned.
That thread was completely unnecessary (and so is this one), you have no legit reason to write down all of their names & UIDs because of something they did a year ago.

['Axion]

What's the point of this thread though? Omniscient replied to the other thread saying "he'll take care of it" and that the thread is "awesome" and I'm pretty sure he knows about the policy change since he changed it (common sense).

This thread is unnecessary drama, I suggest you close this thread before Omniscient does.

[Greg]

I suggest you close this thread before Omniscient does.

Trying to back up your buddy Mr. Reviewer? lmao.

[Meow]

What's the point of this thread though? Omniscient replied to the other thread saying "he'll take care of it" and that the thread is "awesome" and I'm pretty sure he knows about the policy change since he changed it (common sense).

This thread is unnecessary drama, I suggest you close this thread before Omniscient does.

Yeah.. Influence member, I expected this kind of reply.
What was the point of Reviewers thread?

['Axion]

Trying to back up your buddy Mr. Reviewer? lmao.

What does me being in the same group have to do? Also, you do realize he will close this, right? Probably even warn a few members for being dum-dums.

@Meow Not sure if you noticed but two other members replied too.